How well do line drawings depict shape?

ACM Transactions on Graphics

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2009, Pages

  Cole, Forrester ^a   Sanik, Kevin ^b   Decarlo, Doug ^b   Finkelstein, Adam ^a   Funkhouser, Thomas ^a   Rusinkiewicz, Szymon ^a,c   Singh, Manish ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ADOBE RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

Line drawings; Non photorealism; Shape perception

Indexed keywords

3-D SHAPE; 3D OBJECT; 3D SURFACE MODELS; ACCURACY AND PRECISION; DESIGN DECISIONS; GROUND TRUTH DATA; LARGE DATA; LINE DRAWINGS; NON-PHOTOREALISM; SHAPE PERCEPTION; SURFACE NORMALS;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS; DRAWING (GRAPHICS); GAGES;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

EID: 70349658538     PISSN: 07300301     EISSN: 15577368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/1531326.1531334     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. AGRAWALA, M., PHAN, D., HEISER, J., HAYMAKER, J., KLINGNER, J., HANRAHAN, P., AND TVERSKY, B. 2003. Designing effective step-by-step assembly instructions. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 828-837.
2. BELHUMEUR, P. N., KRIEGMAN, D. J., AND YUILLE, A. L. 1999. The bas-relief ambiguity. Int. Journal of Computer Vision 35, 1, 33-44.
3. CANIARD, F., AND FLEMING, R. W. 2007. Distortion in 3d shape estimation with changes in illumination. In ACM Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) 2007, 99-105.
4. COLE, F., DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., KIN, K., MORLEY, K., AND SANTELLA, A. 2006. Directing gaze in 3D models with stylized focus. Eurographics Symposium on Rendering (June), 377-387.
5. COLE, F., GOLOVINSKIY, A., LIMPAECHER, A., BARROS, H. S., FINKELSTEIN, A., FUNKHOUSER, T., AND RUSINKIEWICZ, S. 2008. Where do people draw lines? ACM Trans. Graph. 27, 3.
6. DEBEVEC, P. 1998. Rendering synthetic objects into real scenes. In SIGGRAPH 1998, 189-198.
7. DECARLO, D., AND RUSINKIEWICZ, S. 2007. Highlight lines for conveying shape. In NPAR 2007.
8. DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., RUSINKIEWICZ, S., AND SANTELLA, A. 2003. Suggestive contours for conveying shape. ACM Trans. Graph. 22, 3, 848-855.
9. DECARLO, D., FINKELSTEIN, A., AND RUSINKIEWICZ, S. 2004. Interactive rendering of suggestive contours with temporal coherence. In NPAR 2004, 15-145.
10. FLEMING, R. W., TORRALBA, A., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2004. Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision 4, 9, 798-820.
11. FULVIO, J. M., SINGH, M., AND MALONEY, L. T. 2006. Combining achromatic and chromatic cues to transparency. Journal of Vision 6, 8, 760-776.
12. GOOCH, B., REINHARD, E., AND GOOCH, A. 2004. Human facial illustrations: Creation and psychophysical evaluation. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 1, 27-44.
13. HERTZMANN, A., AND ZORIN, D. 2000. Illustrating smooth surfaces. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 2000, 517-526.
14. INTERRANTE, V., FUCHS, H., AND PIZER, S. 1995. Enhancing transparent skin surfaces with ridge and valley lines. In Proceedings of Vis 1995, IEEE Computer Society, 52.
15. ISENBERG, T., NEUMANN, P., CARPENDALE, S., SOUSA, M. C., AND JORGE, J. A. 2006. Non-photorealistic rendering in context: an observational study. In NPAR 2006, 115-126.
16. JUDD, T., DURAND, F., AND ADELSON, E. H. 2007. Apparent ridges for line drawing. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 19.
17. KAPLAN, M., AND COHEN, E. 2006. Producing models from drawings of curved surfaces. In Eurographics Workshop on Sketch-Based Interfaces and Modeling, 51-58.
18. KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A., AND KAPPERS, A. 1992. Surface perception in pictures. Perception and Psychophysics 52, 487-496.
19. KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A., CHRISTOU, C., AND LAPPIN, J. 1996. Shape constancy in pictorial relief. Perception 25, 155-164. (Pubitemid 126694935)
20. KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A. J., KAPPERS, A. M., AND TODD, J. T. 2001. Ambiguity and the 'mental eye' in pictorial relief. Perception 30, 431-448.
21. KOENDERINK, J. J. 1984. What does the occluding contour tell us about solid shape? Perception 13, 321-330.
22. KOLOMENKIN, M., SHIMSHONI, I., AND TAL, A. 2008. Demarcating curves for shape illustration. ACM Transactions on Graphics 27, 5 (Dec.), 157:1-157:9.
23. LANGER, M. S., AND BÜLTHOFF, H. H. 2001. A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception 30, 4, 403-410.
24. LEE, Y., MARKOSIAN, L., LEE, S., AND HUGHES, J. F. 2007. Line drawings via abstracted shading. ACM Trans. Graph. 26, 3, 18.
25. MALIK, J. 1987. Interpreting line drawings of curved objects. International Journal of Computer Vision 1, 1, 73-103.
26. MAMASSIAN, P., AND LANDY, M. S. 1998. Observer biases in the 3d interpretation of line drawings. Vision Research 38.
27. MARKOSIAN, L., KOWALSKI, M. A., GOLDSTEIN, D., TRYCHIN, S. J., HUGHES, J. F., AND BOURDEV, L. D. 1997. Real-time nonphotorealistic rendering. In Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 1997, 415-420.
28. MITCHELL, J. L., FRANCKE, M., AND ENG, D. 2007. Illustrative rendering in Team Fortress 2. In NPAR 2007, 19-32.
29. OHTAKE, Y., BELYAEV, A., AND SEIDEL, H.-P. 2004. Ridgevalley lines on meshes via implicit surface fitting. ACM Trans. Graph. 23, 3.
30. O'SHEA, J. P., BANKS, M. S., AND AGRAWALA, M. 2008. The assumed light direction for perceiving shape from shading. In ACM Applied Perception in Graphics and Visualization (APGV) 2008, 135-142.
31. PAULY, M., KEISER, R., AND GROSS, M. 2003. Multi-scale feature extraction on point-sampled surfaces. Computer Graphics Forum 22, 3 (Sept.), 281-290.
32. PHILLIPS, F., TODD, J. T., KOENDERINK, J. J., AND KAPPERS, A. M. 2003. Perceptual representation of visible surfaces. Perception and Psychophysics 65, 5, 747-762.
33. SAITO, T., AND TAKAHASHI, T. 1990. Comprehensible rendering of 3-d shapes. In SIGGRAPH 1990, 197-206.
34. SANTELLA, A., AND DECARLO, D. 2004. Visual interest and NPR: an evaluation and manifesto. In NPAR 2004, 71-78.
35. THIRION, J.-P., AND GOURDON, A. 1996. The 3d marching lines algorithm. Graphical Models and Image Processing 58, 6.
36. TODD, J. T., KOENDERINK, J. J., VAN DOORN, A. J., AND KAPPERS, A. M. 1996. Effects of changing viewing conditions on the perceived structure of smoothly curved surfaces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22, 695-706.
37. WALLRAVEN, C., BÜLTHOFF, H. H., CUNNINGHAM, D. W., FISCHER, J., AND BARTZ, D. 2007. Evaluation of real-world and computer-generated stylized facial expressions. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 4, 3, 16.
38. WALTZ, D. L. 1975. Understanding line drawings of scenes with shadows. In The Psychology of Computer Vision, P.Winston, Ed. McGraw-Hill, 19-92.
39. WILLATS, J. 1997. Art and Representation: New Principles in the Analysis of Pictures. Princeton University Press.
40. WINNEMÖLLER, H., FENG, D., GOOCH, B., AND SUZUKI, S. 2007. Using NPR to evaluate perceptual shape cues in dynamic environments. In NPAR 2007, 85-92.