Self-perception and malocclusion and their relation to oral appearance and function;Auto-percepção e má oclusão relacionadas à aparência e a função bucal

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 16, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 4059-4066

  Peres, Sílvia Helena de Carvalho Sales ^a   Goya, Suzana ^a   Cortellazzi, Karine Laura ^b   Ambrosano, Gláucia Maria Bovi ^b   Meneghim, Marcelo de Castro ^b   Pereira, Antonio Carlos ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Adolescent health; Malocclusion; Oral health; Self concept

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SELF CONCEPT;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; SELF CONCEPT;

EID: 80055107894     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232011001100011     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Albino JEN, Laurence SD, Tedesco LA. Psychological and social effects of treatment. J Behav Med 1994; 17(1):81-98.
2. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991; 49(9):963-969.
3. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Lagrave MO, Major PW. Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Orthodont 2004; 31(3):204-209.
4. Gosney MBE. An investigation into some of the factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Brit J Orthodont 1986; 13(2):87-94.
5. Birkeland K, Katle A, Lovgreen S, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. A longitudinal study among 11- and 15-year-olds and their parents on factors influencing the decision about orthodontic treatment. J Orofacial Orthop 1999; 60(5):292-307.
6. Jenny J. A social perspective of dentofacial esthetics and orthognathic surgery. Angle Orthod 1975; 54(1):18-35.
7. Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetic in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8(5):244-256.
8. Shaw WC. The influence of children's dentofacial appearance on their social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1980; 79(4):399-415.
9. Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y, Yamashita Y, Take-hara T, Jenny J, Cons NC. Prevalence of malocclu-sion in high school students in Japan according to the dental Aesthetic Index. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993; 21(5):303-305.
10. Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary school children in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the DAI. Community Dent Health 1994; 11(3): 147-151.
11. Onyeaso CO, Aderinokun GA. The relationship between dental aesthetic index (DAI) andpercep-tions of aesthetics, function and speech amongst secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria. Int J Paediatr Dent 2003; 13(5):336-341.
12. World Health Organization (WHO). International Collaboration Study of Oral Health Outcomes (IC-SII), Document 2 - Oral Data Collection and Examination Criteria. Geneva: WHO; 1989.
13. th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
14. Espeland LU, Ivarsson K, Stenvik A, Alstad TA. Perception of malocclusion in 11-year-old children: a comparison between personal and parental awareness. Eur J Orthod 1992; 14(5):350-358.
15. Onyeaso CO, Sanu OO. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion among 12-18 year old secondary school children in Ibadan. Odontostomatol Trop 2005; 28(109):39-48.
16. Lewit DW, Virolainen K. Conformity and independence in adolescents' motivation for orthodontic treatment. Child Dev 1968; 39(4):1189-1200.
17. Onyeaso CO. Orthodontic Treatment Complexity and Need in a Group of Nigerian Patients: The Relationship between the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) and the Index of Complexity, Outcome, and Need (ICON). J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8(3):37-44.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33(1):159-174.
19. Lucas SD, Portela MC, Mendonça LL. Variations in tooth decay rates among children 5 and 12 years old in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21(1):55-63.
20. Tagliaferro EPS, Pereira AC, Meneghim MC, Amb-rosano GMB. Assessment of dental caries predictors in a seven-year longitudinal study. J Publ Health Dent 2006; 66(3):169-173.
21. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.2. Cary (NY): SAS Institute Inc.; 2001.
22. Botazzo C. Sobre a bucalidade: notas para a pes-quisa e contribuição ao debate. Cien Saude Colet 2006; 11(1):7-17.
23. Horowitz HS, Vohen LK, Doyle J. Occlusal relations in children born and reared in an optimally fluoridated community. (IV) Clinical and socio-psycho-logical findings. Angle Orthod 1971; 41(3):189-201.
24. Jenkins PM, Feldman BS, Stirrups DR. The effect of social class and dental features on referrals for orthodontic advice and treatment. Br J Orthod 1984; 11(4):185-188.
25. Onyeaso CO, BeGole EA. Orthodontic Treatment Need in an Accredited Graduate Orthodontic Center in North America: A Pilot Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 7(2):1-5.
26. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: College of Dentistry University of Iowa; 1986.
27. Katoh Y, Ansai T, Kitakyushu TT, Fukuoka YY, Ni-igata HM, Jenny J, Cons NC. A comparison of DAI scores and characteristics of occlusal traits in three ethnic groups of Asian origin. Int Dent J 1998; 48(4): 405-411.
28. Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ, Jakobson J. Differences in need for orthodontic treatment between native Americans and the general population based on DAI scores. J Public Health Dent 1991; 51(4):234-238.
29. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Secretaria de po-líticas de Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Área Técnica de Saúde Bucal. Projeto SB Brasil: con-dições de saúde bucal da população brasileira. Resul-tados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004.
30. Frazão P, Narvai PC, Latorre MRDO, Castellanos RA. Prevalência de oclusopatia na dentição decídua e permanente de crianças na cidade de São Paulo, Brasil, 1996. Cad Saude Publica 2002; 18(5):1197-1205.
31. Marques LS, Barbosa CC, Ramos-Jorge ML, Por-deus IA, Paiva SM. Prevalência da maloclusão e necessidade de tratamento ortodôntico em escola-res de 10 a 14 anos de idade em Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil: enfoque psicossocial. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21(4):1099-1106.
32. Alsaker F, Olweus D. Global self-evaluations and perceived instability of self in early adolescence: a cohort longitudinal study. Scand J Psychol 1993; 34(1):47-63.
33. Korabik K. Self-concept changes during orthodontic treatment. J Appl Soc Psychol 1994; 24(11):1022-1034.
34. Varela M, Garcia-Camba JE. Impact of orthodontics on psychologic profile of adults patients: a prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995; 108(2):142-148.
35. Shue-Te Yeh M, Koochek AR, Vlaskalic V, Boyd R, Richmond S. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118(4):421-428.
36. Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Aust Dent J 1996; 41(1):43-46.