The relationship between dental aesthetic index (DAI) and perceptions of aesthetics, function and speech amongst secondary school children in Ibadan, Nigeria

International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 336-341

  Onyeaso, C O ^a,b   Aderinokun, G A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN   (Nigeria)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENTISTRY; EPIDEMIOLOGICAL DATA; ESTHETICS; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH SCHOOL; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MASTICATION; NIGERIA; NORMAL HUMAN; ORTHODONTICS; PERCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZATION; SCALE UP; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOOTH;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MASTICATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NIGERIA; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0141890938     PISSN: 09607439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-263X.2003.00478.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. American Journal of Orthodontics 1971; 59: 552-567.
2. Salzmann JA. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. American Journal of Orthodontics 1968; 54: 749-765.
3. Grainger RM. Orthodontic treatment priority index. PHS Publication No. 1000, Series 2, No. 25. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1967.
4. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: College of Dentistry University of Iowa, 1986.
5. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an orthodontic treatment priority index. European Journal of Orthodontics 1989; 11: 309-320.
6. Jenny J, Cons NC. Comparing and contrasting two orthodontic indices, the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Dental Aesthetic Index. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1996; 110: 410-416.
7. Otuyemi OD, Ogunyinka A, Dosumu O et al. Perception of dental aesthetics in the United States and Nigeria. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1998; 26: 418-420.
8. Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y et al. Prevalence of malocclusion in high school students in Japan according to the DAI. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1993; 21: 303-305.
9. Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary school children in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the DAI. Community Dental Health 1994; 11: 147-151.
10. World Health Organization (WHO). International Collaboration Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS II), Document 2 - Oral Data Collection and Examination Criteria. Geneva: WHO, 1989.
11. WHO. Oral Health Surveys. Basic methods, 4th edn. Geneva: WHO, 1997.
12. Jenny J. A social perspective on need and demand for orthodontic treatment. International Dental Journal 1975; 25: 248-256.
13. Helm S. Orthodontic treatment priorities in the Danish Child Dental Health Services. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 1982; 10: 260-263.
14. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychological implications of malocclusion: a 15-year follow-up study in 30-year-old Danes. American Journal of Orthodontics 1985; 87: 110-118.
15. Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness and satisfaction. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 1991; 100: 234-241.
16. Espeland LU, Ivarsson K, Stenvik A, Alstad TA. Perception of malocclusion in 11-year-old children: a comparison between personal and parental awareness. European Journal of Orthodontics 1992; 14: 350-358.
17. Lewit DW, Virolainen K. Conformity and independence in adolescents' motivation for orthodontic treatment. Child Development 1968; 39: 1189-1200.
18. Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 1981; 3: 151-162.
19. Vally I. A comparison of lay and professional opinion on treatment need and treatment outcome (MScD Thesis). Wales: University of Wales College of Medicine, 1997.
20. Tang ELK, So LLY. Correlation of orthodontic treatment demand with treatment need assessed using two indices. Angle Orthodontist 1995; 65: 443-450.
21. Pietila T, Pietila I. Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-16-year-old adolescents in Eastern Finland. Community Dental Health 1996; 13: 139-144.
22. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Subjective assessment of dental and psychological effects of orthodontic treatment. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics 1997; 58: 44-61.
23. Shue-Te Yeh M, Koochek AR, Vlaskalic V, Boyd R, Richmond S. The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2000; 118: 421-428.
24. Spencer AJ, Allister JN, Brennan DS. Utility of the Dental Aesthetic Index as an orthodontic screening tool in Australia. Adelaide: University of Adelaide, 1992.
25. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. Associations of dental aesthetic Index (DAI) with dental appearance, smile and desire for orthodontic treatment. Journal of Dental Research 1987; 66: Abstract No. 1081.
26. Jenny J, Cons NC. Establishing malocclusion severity levels on The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) scale. Australian Dental Journal 1996; 41: 43-46.