The relationship of 2 professional occlusal indexes with patients' perceptions of aesthetics, function, speech, and orthodontic treatment need

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 118, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 421-428

  Yeh, Matthew Shue Te ^c   Koochek, Amir Reza ^c   Vlaskalic, Vicki ^a   Boyd, Robert ^a   Richmond, Stephen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE PACIFIC   (United States)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MASTICATION; METHODOLOGY; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; JAW RELATION RECORD; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MASTICATION; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SELF CONCEPT; SPEECH; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0034295306     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2000.107008     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Summers CJ. The occlusal index: a system for identifying and scoring occlusal disorders. AmJ Orthod 1971;59:552-67.
2. Salzmann JA. Handicapping malocclusion assessment to establish treatment priority. Am J Orthod 1968;54:749-65.
3. Grainger RM. Orthodontic treatment priority index. PHS publication no. 1000, Series 2, No. 25. Washington: US Government Printing Office, 1967.
4. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the dental aesthetic index. Iowa City: College of Dentistry, University of Iowa, 1986.
5. Brook PH, Shaw WC. The development of an orthodontic treatment priority index. Eur J Orthod 1989;11:309-20.
6. Ansai T, Miyazaki H, Katoh Y, Imashita Y, Takehara T, Jenny J, et al. Prevalence of malocclusion in high school students in Japan according to the DAI. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993;21:303-5.
7. Estioko LJ, Wright FAC, Morgan MV. Orthodontic treatment need of secondary school children in Heidelberg, Victoria: an epidemiological study using the DAI. Community Dent Health 1994;11:147-51.
8. WHO. International Collaboration Study of Oral Health Outcomes (ICS II), document 2-oral data collection and examination criteria. Geneva: WHO, 1989.
9. Evans R, Shaw WC. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987;9: 314-8.
10. Shaw WC, Richmond S, O'Brien KD. The use of occlusal indices: a European perspective. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;107:1-10.
11. Stenvik A, Espeland L, Linge BO, Linge L. Lay attitudes to dental appearance and need for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:271-7.
12. Jenny J. A social perspective on need and demand for orthodontic treatment. Int Dent J 1975;25:248-56.
13. Helm S. Orthodontic treatment priorities in the Danish Child Dental Health Services. Comm Dent Oral Epid 1982;10:260-3.
14. Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychological implications of malocclusion: a 15-year follow-up study in 30-year old Danes. Am J Orthod 1985;87;110-8.
15. Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults: relationship between occlusion, awareness and satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100: 234-41.
16. Espeland LV, Ivarsson K, Stenvik A, Alstad TA. Perception of malocclusion in 11-year-old children: a comparison between personal and parental awareness. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:350-8.
17. Lewit DW, Virolainen K. Conformity and independence in adolescents' motivation for orthodontic treatment. Child Dev 1968;39:1189-200.
18. Shaw WC. Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod 1981;3:151-62.
19. Vally I. A comparison of lay and professional opinion on treatment need and treatment outcome [MScD thesis]. University of Wales College of Medicine, 1997.
20. Roberts CT, Richmond S. The design and analysis of reliability studies for the use of epidemiological and audit studies in orthodontics. Br J Orthod 1997;24:139-47.
21. Richmond S, Shaw WC, O'Brien KD, Buchanan IB, Stephens CD, Andrews M, et al. The relationship between the index of orthodontic treatment need and consensus opinion of a panel of 74 dentists. Br Dent J 1995;178:370-4.
22. World Health Organization Oral Health Surveys Basic Methods, 4th ed. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
23. Tang ELK, So LLY. Correlation of orthodontic treatment demand with treatment need assessed using two indices. Angle Orthod 1995;65:443-50.
24. Pietila T, Pietila I. Dental appearance and orthodontic services assessed by 15-to 16-year-old adolescents in eastern Finland. Community Dent Health 1996;13:139-44.
25. Birkeland K, Boe OE, Wisth PJ. Subjective assessment of dental and psychological effects of orthodontic treatment. J Orofacial Orthop 1997;58:44-61.
26. Beglin F, Vig KWL, Beck F, Kuthy R, Wade D. Comparison of three occlusal indices of orthodontic treatment need. J Dent Res 1997(IADR Abstracts);76:161.
27. Tarvit DJ, Freer TJ. Assessing malocclusion: the time factor. Br J Orthod 1998;25:31-4.
28. Otuyemi OD, Noar JH. A comparison between DAI and SCAN in estimating orthodontic treatment need. Int Dent J 1996;46: 35-40.
29. Otuyemi OD, Noar JH. Variability in recording and grading the need for orthodontic treatment using the HMAR, OI and DAI. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:222-4.