Enhanced passive and active processing of syllables in musician children

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2011, Pages 3874-3887

  Chobert, Julie ^a   Marie, Céline ^b   François, Clément ^a   Schön, Daniele ^a   Besson, Mireille ^a  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITY   (France)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHILD; CONSONANT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FREQUENCY DISCRIMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MUSIC; MUSICIAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SPEECH ARTICULATION; VOWEL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SPEECH PERCEPTION;

EID: 80055103980     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: 15308898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00088     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Anvari, S. H., Trainor, L. J., Woodside, J., & Levy, B. A. (2002). Relation among musical skills, phonological processing and early reading ability in preschool children. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 111-130.
2. Besson, M., & Faïta, F. (1995). An event related potential (ERP) study of musical expectancy: Comparison of musicians with nonmusicians. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1278-1296.
3. Besson, M., & Schön, D. (in press). What remains of modularity? In P. Rebuschat, M. Rohrmeier, J. Hawkins, & I. Cross (Eds.), Language and music as cognitive systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bidelman, G. M., Gandour, J. T., & Krishnan, A. (2011). Cross-domain effects of music and language experience on the representation of pitch in the human auditory brainstem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 425-434.
5. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2001). Praat (version 4.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from www.praat.org, July 4, 2011.
6. Brattico, E., Näätänen, R., & Tervaniemi, M. (2001). Context effects on pitch perception in musicians and nonmusicians: Evidence from event-related potential recordings. Music Perception, 19, 199-222.
7. Chandrasekaran, B., & Kraus, N. (2010). The scalp-recorded brainstem response to speech: Neural origins. Psychophysiology, 47, 236-246.
8. Chandrasekaran, B., Krishnan, A., & Gandour, J. T. (2009). Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours. Brain and Language, 108, 1-9.
9. Courchesne, E., Hillyard, S. A., & Galambos, R. (1975). Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 39, 131-143.
10. Dehaene-Lambertz, G. (1997). Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults. NeuroReport, 8, 919-924.
11. Dehaene-Lambertz, G., & Baillet, S. (1998). A phonological representation in the infant brain. NeuroReport, 9, 1885-1888.
12. Escera, C., Alho, K., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1998). Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 590-604.
13. Fedorenko, E., Patel, A., Casasanto, D., Winawer, J., & Gibson, E. (2009). Structural integration in language and music: Evidence for a shared system. Memory & Cognition, 37, 1-9.
14. Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Fodor, J. A. (2000). The mind doesn't work that way. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Fujioka, T., Trainor, L. J., Ross, B., Kakigi, R., & Pantev, C. (2004). Musical training enhances automatic encoding of melodic contour and interval structure. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1010-1021.
17. Gaser, C., & Schlaug, G. (2003). Brain structures differ between musicians and nonmusicians. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 9240-9245.
18. Hyde, K., Lerch, J., Norton, A., Forgeard, M., Winner, E., Evans, A., et al. (2009). Musical training shapes structural brain development. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 3019-3025.
19. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten twenty electrode system of the international federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
20. Jewett, D. L., Romano, M. N., & Williston, J. S. (1970). Human auditory evoked potentials: Possible brain stem components detected on the scalp. Science, 167, 1517-1518.
21. Jones, J. L., Lucker, J., Zalewski, C., Brewer, C., & Drayna, D. (2009). Phonological processing in adults with deficits in musical pitch recognition. Journal of Communication Disorders, 42, 226-234.
22. Kishon-Rabin, L., Amir, O., Vexler, Y., & Zaltz, Y. (2001). Pitch discrimination: Are professional musicians better than non-musicians? Journal of Basic & Clinical Physiology & Pharmacology, 12, 125-143.
23. Knight, R. T. (1996). Contribution of human hippocampal region to novelty detection. Nature, 383, 256-259.
24. Koelsch, S., Fritz, T., Schulze, K., Alsop, D., & Schlaug, G. (2005). Adults and children processing music: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 25, 1068-1076.
25. Koelsch, S., Schröger, E., & Tervaniemi, M. (1999). Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. NeuroReport, 10, 1309-1313.
26. Kraus, N., & Chandrasekaran, B. (2010). Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11, 599-605.
27. Kujala, T., Tervaniemi, M., & Schröger, E. (2007). The mismatch negativity in cognitive and clinical neuroscience: Theoretical and methodological considerations. Biological Psychology, 74, 1-19.
28. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10, 1-28.
29. Loui, P., Alsop, D., & Schlaug, G. (2009). Tone-deafness: A disconnection syndrome? Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 10215-10220.
30. Lovio, R., Pakarinen, S., Huotilainen, M., Alku, P., Silvennoinen, S., Näätänen, R., et al. (2009). Auditory discrimination profiles of speech sound changes in 6-year-old children as determined with the multi-feature MMN paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 916-921.
31. Magne, C., Schön, D., & Besson, M. (2006). Musician children detect pitch violations in both music and language better than non-musician children. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 199-211.
32. Marie, C., Delogu, F., Lampis, G., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., & Besson, M. (2011). Influence of musical expertise on segmental and tonal processing in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 2701-2715.
33. Marie, C., Kujala, T., and Besson, M. (in press). Musical and linguistic expertise influence pre-attentive and attentive processing of non-speech sounds. Cortex. (doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.006)
34. Marie, C., Magne, C., & Besson, M. (2011). Musicians and the metric structure of words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 294-305.
35. Marques, C., Moreno, S., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2007). Musicians detect pitch violation in a foreign language better than non-musicians: Behavioural and electrophysiological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19, 1453-1463.
36. Mills, L., & Rollman, G. B. (1979). Left hemisphere selectivity for processing duration in normal subjects. Brain and Language, 7, 320-335.
37. Milovanov, R., Huotilainen, M., Esquef, P. A. A., Välimäki, V., Alku, P., & Tervaniemi, M. (2009). The role of musical aptitude and language skills in preattentive duration determination in school-aged children. Neuroscience Letters, 460, 161-165.
38. Moreno, S., Marques, C., Santos, A., Santos, M., Castro, S. L., & Besson, M. (2009). Musical training influences linguistic abilities in 8-year-old children: More evidence for brain plasticity. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 712-713.
39. Musacchia, G., Sams, M., Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 104, 15894-15898.
40. Musacchia, G., Strait, D., & Kraus, N. (2008). Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and nonmusicians. Hearing Research, 241, 34-42.
41. Näätänen, R., Gaillard, A. W. K., & Mäntysalo, S. (1978). Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. Acta Psychologica, 42, 313-329.
42. Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K. (2007). The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review. Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 2544-2590.
43. Näätänen, R., Pakarinen, S., Rinne, T., & Takegata, R. (2004). The mismatch negativity (MMN): Towards the optimal paradigm. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 140-144.
44. Näätänen, R., Schröger, E., Karakas, S., Tervaniemi, M., & Paavilainen, P. (1993). Development of a memory trace for a complex sound in the human brain. NeuroReport, 4, 503-506.
45. Nikjeh, D. A., Lister, J. J., & Frisch, S. A. (2009). Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: Influence of music training. Ear and Hearing, 30, 432-446.
46. Novitski, N., Tervaniemi, M., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2004). Frequency discrimination at different frequency levels as indexed by electrophysiological and behavioral measures. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 26-36.
47. Overy, K., Nicolson, R. I., Fawcett, A. J., & Clarke, E. F. (2003). Dyslexia and music: Measuring musical timing skills. Dyslexia, 9, 18-36.
48. Pakarinen, S., Lovio, R., Huotilainen, M., Alku, P., Näätänen, R., & Kujala, T. (2009). Fast multi-feature paradigm for recording several mismatch negativities (MMNs) to phonetic and acoustic changes in speech sounds. Biological Psychology, 82, 219-226.
49. Pakarinen, S., Takegata, R., Rinne, T., Huotilainen, M., & Näätänen, R. (2007). Measurement of extensive auditory discrimination profiles using the mismatch negativity (MMN) of the auditory event-related potential (ERP). Clinical Neurophysiology, 118, 177-185.
50. Phillips, C., Pellathy, T., Marantz, A., Yellin, E., Wexler, K., Poeppel, D., et al. (2000). Auditory cortex accesses phonological categories: An MEG mismatch study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 1038-1055.
51. Poeppel, D. (2001). Pure word deafness and the bilateral processing of the speech code. Cognitive Science, 25, 679-693.
52. Reinke, K. S., He, Y., Wang, C., & Alain, C. (2003). Perceptual learning modulates sensory evoked response during vowel segregation. Brain Research, Cognitive Brain Research, 17, 781-791.
53. Sams, M., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., & Näätänen, R. (1985). Auditory frequency discrimination and event-related potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 62, 437-438.
54. Schlaug, G., Norton, A., Overy, K., & Winner, E. (2005). Effects of music training on brain and cognitive development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1060, 219-230.
55. Schneider, P., Scherg, M., Dosch, H. G., Specht, H. J., Gutschalk, A., & Rupp, A. (2002). Morphology of Heschl's gyrus reflects enhanced activation in the auditory cortex of musicians. Nature Neuroscience, 5, 688-694.
56. Schön, D., Magne, C., & Besson, M. (2004). The music of speech: Electrophysiological study of pitch perception in language and music. Psychophysiology, 41, 341-349.
57. Schröger, E., & Wolff, C. (1998). Attentional orienting and reorienting is indicated by human event-related brain potentials. NeuroReport, 26, 3355-3358.
58. Serniclaes, W. (1987). Etude expérimentale de la perception du trait de voisement des occlusives du français. Ph.D. thesis, l'Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium.
59. Shahin, A., Roberts, L. E., & Trainor, L. J. (2004). Enhancement of auditory cortical development by musical experience in children. NeuroReport, 15, 1917-1921.
60. Sharma, A., & Dorman, M. F. (1999). Cortical auditory evoked potential correlates of categorical perception of voice-onset-time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 1078-1083.
61. levc, L. R., & Miyake, A. (2006). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Does musical ability matter? Psychological Science, 17, 675-681.
62. Spiegel, M. F., & Watson, C. S. (1984). Performance on frequency discrimination tasks by musicians and nonmusicians. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 76, 1690-1695.
63. Squires, N. K., Squires, K. C., & Hillyard, S. A. (1975). Two varieties of long latency positive waves evoked by impredictable auditory stimuli. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 387-401.
64. Tervaniemi, M., Just, V., Koelsch, S., Widmann, A., & Schröger, E. (2005). Pitch-discrimination accuracy in musicians vs. non-musicians-An event-related potential and behavioral study. Experimental Brain Research, 161, 1-10.
65. Tervaniemi, M., Kruck, S., De Baene, W., Schröger, E., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (2009). Top-down modulation of auditory processing: Effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 1636-1642.
66. Tervaniemi, M., Rytkönen, M., Schröger, E., Ilmoniemi, R. J., & Näätänen, R. (2001). Superior formation of cortical memory traces for melodic patterns in musicians. Learning & Memory, 8, 295-300.
67. Tiitinen, H., May, P., Reinikainen, K., & Näätänen, R. (1994). Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature, 370, 90-92.
68. Trainor, L. J., Shahin, A., & Roberts, L. E. (2003). Effects of musical training on the auditory cortex in children. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 999, 506-513.
69. Vuust, P., Pallesen, K. J., Bailey, C., van Zuijen, T. L., Gjedde, A., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). To musicians, the message is in the meter-pre-attentive neuronal responses to incongruent rhythm are left-lateralized in musicians. Neuroimage, 24, 560-564.
70. Wong, P. C. M., Skoe, E., Russo, N. M., Dees, T., & Kraus, N. (2007). Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 420-422.