Quality in the ambulatory endoscopy center

Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 224-228

  Petersen, Bret T ^a  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

Benchmarking; Lean method; Outcomes; Quality measures; Six sigma

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; AMBULATORY CARE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFECTION CONTROL; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 80055091463     PISSN: 10962883     EISSN: 15585050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2011.07.002     Document Type: Review

References (37)

1. Gustafson D.H., Hundt A.S. Findings of innovation research applied to quality management principles for health care. Health Care Manage Rev 1995, 20:16-33.
2. Chassin M.R., Galvin R.W. The urgent need to improve health care quality. Institute of Medicine National Roundtable on Health Care Quality. JAMA 1998, 280:1000-1005.
3. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System 2000, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DC. L.T. Kohn, J.M. Corrigan, M.S. Donaldson (Eds.).
4. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century 2001, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DC.
5. Johanson J.F. Continuous quality improvement in the ambulatory endoscopy center. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002, 12:351-365.
6. Johansson J.F., Schmitt C., Deas T.M., et al. Quality and outcomes assessment in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2000, 52:827-830.
7. Rex D.K., Bond J.H., Winawer S., et al. Quality in the technical performance of colonoscopy and the continuous quality improvement process for colonoscopy: recommendations of the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:1296-1308.
8. Faigel D.O., Pike I.M. Quality indicators for gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: an introduction. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(suppl):S3-S9. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy.
9. Cohen J., Safdi M.A., Deal S.E. Quality indicators for esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(suppl):S10-S15.
10. Rex D.K., Petrini J.L., Baron T.H. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(suppl):S16-S28. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy.
11. Baron T.H., Petersen B.T., Mergener K. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(suppl):S29-S34. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy.
12. Jacobson B.C., Chak A., Hoffman B. Quality indicators for endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63(suppl):S35-S38. ASGE/ACG Taskforce on Quality in Endoscopy.
13. Harrington L., Pigman H. Quality Measurement. Medical Quality Management: Theory and Practice 2010, Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury, MA. P. Varkey (Ed.).
14. Sanaka M.R., Super D.M., Feldman E.S., et al. Improving compliance with postpolypectomy surveillance guidelines: an interventional study using a continuous quality improvement initiative. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:97-103.
15. Lim T. Statistical process control tools for monitoring clinical performance. Int J Qual Health Care 2003, 15:3-4.
16. Bolsin S., Colson M. Making the case for personal performance monitoring in healthcare. Int J Qual Health Care 2003, 15:1-2.
17. Matchar D.B., Samsa G.P. The role of evidence reports in evidence-based medicine: A mechanism for linking scientific evidence and practice improvement. Jt Comm J Qual Improv 1999, 25:522-528.
18. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.cms.hhs.gov/PQRI.
19. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.jointcommission.org/patientsafety/nationalpatientsafetygoals.
20. Accessed January 30, 2011. https://www.uhc.edu/12443.htm.
21. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.giquic.org.
22. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.aaahc.org.
23. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.jointcommission.org.
24. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.aaaasf.org.
25. Petersen B.T. Advances in endoscopy: ASGE's Endoscopy Unit Recognition Program. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009, 11:756-757.
26. Lieberman D., Nadel M., Smith R.A., et al. Standardized colonoscopy reporting and data system: report of the Quality Assurance Task Group of the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable. Gastrointest Endosc 2007, 65:757-766.
27. Lieberman D.A., Faigel D.O., Logan J.R., et al. Assessment of the quality of colonoscopy reports: results from a multicenter consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 2009, 69:645-653.
28. Krist A.H., Jones R.M., Woolf S.H., et al. Timing of repeat colonoscopy: disparity between guidelines and endoscopists' recommendation. Am J Prev Med 2007, 33:471-478.
29. Schoen R.E., Pinsky P.F., Weissfeld J.L., et al. Utilization of surveillance colonoscopy in community practice. Gastroenterology 2010, 138:73-81.
30. Accessed February 1, 2011. http://www.qualityforum.org/Measures_List.aspx.
31. Accessed February 1, 2011. http://www.cms.gov/PQRI/15_MeasuresCodes.asp#TopOfPage.
32. Kaminski M.F., Regula J., Kraszewska E., et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy and the risk of interval cancer. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:1795-1803.
33. Langley G.J., Nolan K.M., Nolan T.W., et al. The Improvement Guide: A Practical Approach to Enhancing Organizational Performance 1996, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
34. Womack J., Jones D. Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation 1996, Simon and Schuster, New York.
35. Accessed January 30, 2011. http://www.jointcommission.org/sentinel_event.aspx.
36. Cotton P.B., Eisen G.M., Aabakken L., et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc 2010, 71:446-454.
37. Accessed April 11, 2011. http://www.asge.org.