The impact of interpersonal networks on the innovativeness of inventors: From theory to empirical evidence

International Journal of Innovation Management

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 931-958

  Chassagnon, Virgile ^a,b   Audran, Marilyne ^c,d  

^a Catholic University of Lyon ^*  (France)

^b GREDEG CNRS   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^d University of Lyon 2 ENS Triangle   (France)

Author keywords

cooperation; Innovativeness; interpersonal network; patent document data; prolific inventor

Indexed keywords

EID: 80055091355     PISSN: 13639196     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S1363919611003349     Document Type: Article

References (108)

1. Adler, PS and SW Kwon (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
2. Ahuja, G (2000). Collaboration networks, structural holes, and innovation: A longitudinal study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(3), 425-455.
3. Argote, L (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
4. Avlonitis, GJ, A Kouremenos and N Tzokas (1994). Assessing the innovativeness of organizations and its antecedents: Project Innovstrat. European Journal of Marketing, 28(1), 5-28.
5. Balconi, M, S Breschi and F Lissoni (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33, 127-145.
6. Baudry, B and V Chassagnon (2010). The close relation between organization theory and Oliver Williamson's transaction cost economics: A theory of the firm perspective. Journal of Institutional Economics, 6(4), 477-503.
7. Baudry, B and V Chassagnon (2011). The vertical network organization as a specific governance structure: What are the challenges for incomplete contracts theories and what are the theoretical implications for the boundaries of the (hub-)firm? Journal of Management and Governance, forthcoming.
8. Benson, JK (1975). The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20(2), 229-249.
9. Blau, P (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
10. Bolino, MC, WH Turnley and JM Bloodgood (2002). Citizenship behaviour and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505-522.
11. Borgatti, SP and PC Foster (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013. (Pubitemid 37453275)
12. Bouty, I (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences on informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizational boundaries. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 50-65.
13. Burt, RS (1992). Structural Holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14. Burt, RS (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399. (Pubitemid 39567637)
15. Chassagnon, V (2009). The theory of the firm revisited from a power perspective. Druid Conference Working Paper.
16. Chassagnon, V (2011). The network-firm as a single real entity: Beyond the aggregate of legal distinct entities. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(1), 113-136.
17. Cantner, U and H Graf (2006). The network of innovators in Jena: An application of social network analysis. Research Policy, 35, 463-480.
18. Chell, E (2000). Networking entrepreneurship and microbusiness behaviour. Entrepre-neurship and Regional Development, 12(3), 195-216.
19. Cohen, D and L Prusak (2001). In Good Company. How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
20. Coleman, JS (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
21. Coleman, JS (1994). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
22. Cook, KS and RM Emerson (1984). Exchange networks and the analysis of complex organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 3, 1-30.
23. DiMaggio, PJ and WW Powell (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
24. Ejermo, O and C Karlsson (2006). Interregional inventor networks as studied by patentcoinventorships. Research Policy, 35, 412-430.
25. Emerson, RM (1962). Power-dependence relations, American Sociological Review, 27(1), 31-41.
26. Emerson, RM (1981). Social exchange theory. In Morris, P, Rosenberg and RH Turner (Eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, pp. 30-65. New York: Basic Books.
27. Fang, C, J Lee and MA Schilling (2006). Exploration and exploitation in complex networks: The influence of interpersonal network structure. Organization Science Winter Conference.
28. Fleming, L, C King and A Juda (2007). Small worlds and regional innovation. Organization Science, 18(6), 938-954.
29. Gay, C, W Latham and C Le Bas (2008). Collective knowledge, prolific inventors and the value of inventions: An empirical study of French, German and British patents in the US, 1975-1999. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17, 5-22.
30. Goldspink, C and R Kay (2004). Bridging the micro-macro divide: A new basis for social science. Human Relations, 57(5), 597-618. (Pubitemid 38882842)
31. Granovetter, MS (1973). Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
32. Granovetter, MS (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481-510.
33. Gulati, R (1999). Network location and learning: The influence of network resources and firm capabilities on alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420. (Pubitemid 129548660)
34. Gulati, R and M Gargiulo (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439-1493.
35. Gulati, R, N Nohria and A Zaheer (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203-215.
36. Hagardon, A and R Sutton (1997). Technology brokering and innovation in a product-development firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 716-749.
37. Hansen, M (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82-111.
38. Hansen, E, J Heikki and C Knowles (2007). Innovativeness in the global forest products industry: Exploring new insights. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 37, 1324-1335. (Pubitemid 350112938)
39. Harhoff, D, F Narin, FM Scherer and K Vopel (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511-515.
40. Holly, R and D Krackhardt (2001). Intraorganizational networks. In Joel, A and Baum, C (Eds.), Companion to Organizations. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Hult, GT, RF Hurley and GA Knight (2004). Innovativeness: Its antecedents and impact on business performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 429-438. (Pubitemid 38687208)
42. Hurley, RF and GT Hult (1998). Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: An integration and empirical examination. Journal of Marketing, 62(3), 42-54.
43. Hurley, RF, GT Hult and GA Knight (2005). Innovativeness and capacity to innovate in a complexity of firm-level relationships: A response to Woodside (2004). Industrial Marketing Management, 35, 281-283. (Pubitemid 40518360)
44. Jenssen, JI and A Greve (2002). Does the degree of redundancy in social networks influence the success of business start-ups. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 8(5), 254-267.
45. Jenssen, JI and E Nybakk (2009). Inter-organizational innovation promoters in small, knowledge-intensive firms. International Journal of Innovation Management, 13(3), 441-466.
46. Kahn, BF and KL Sokoloff (2004). Institutions and democratic invention in 19th-century America: Evidence from "great inventors", 1790-1930. American Economic Review, 395-401. (Pubitemid 39057125)
47. Katz, JS and BR Martin (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26, 1-18. (Pubitemid 127416779)
48. Kollock, P (1994). The emergence of exchange structures: An experimental study of uncertainty, commitment and trust. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 315-345.
49. Krackhardt, D (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In Nohria, N and R Eccles (Eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structures, Form and Action, pp. 216-239. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
50. Landry, R, N Amara and M Lamari (2002). Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 69(7), 681-701.
51. Leana, CR and HJ Van Buren (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538-555.
52. Le Bas, C, A Cabagnols and R Bouklia (2010). Prolific inventors: Who are they and where do they locate? Evidence from a five countries US patenting data set. International Centre for Economic Research Working Paper No. 14/2010. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract= 1625743.
53. Lawler, EJ (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 107(2), 321-352.
54. Lawler, EJ and J Yoon (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61, 89-108. (Pubitemid 126590173)
55. Lawler, EJ and J Yoon (1998). Network structure and emotion in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 871-894. (Pubitemid 29170942)
56. Levin, DZ and R Cross (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
57. Lewicki, RJ and B Bunker (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Kramer, R and T Tyler (Eds.), Trust in Organizations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58. Lotka, AJ (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Science, 16(2), 317-323.
59. Ma, X, X Yao and Y Xi (2009). How do interorganizational and interpersonal networks affect a firm's strategic adaptative capability in a transition economy? Journal of Business Research, 62, 1087-1095.
60. Mairesse, J and P Mohnen (2002). Accounting for innovation and measuring innova-tiveness: An illustrative framework and an application. American Economic Review,92(2), 226-230.
61. Marsden, PV (1990). Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
62. Mariani, M (2000). Networks of inventors in the chemical industry. Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), no. 2/20-019.
63. Mayer, RC, JH Davis and D Schoorman (1995). An intergrative model of organizational trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
64. Melin, G (2000). Pragmatism and self-organization research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy, 29, 31-40.
65. Melin, G and O Persson (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377. (Pubitemid 126449889)
66. Meyer, WM and B Rowan (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363.
67. Morone, P and R Taylor (2004). Knowledge diffusion dynamics and network properties of face-to-face interactions. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 327-351. (Pubitemid 38799716)
68. Nahapiet, J and S Ghoshal (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
69. Narin, F and A Breitzman (1995). Inventive productivity. Research Policy, 24(4), 507-519.
70. Nerkar, A and S Paruchuri (2005). Evolution of R&D capabilities: The role of knowledge networks within a firm. Management Science, 51(5), 771-785. (Pubitemid 40867143)
71. Newman, MEJ (2001a). Scientific collaboration networks I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review, 64, 016131.
72. Newman, MEJ (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review, 64, 016132.
73. Nonaka, I and N Konno (1998). The concept of 'Ba': Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 1-15.
74. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2005. Oslo Manual, guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, third edition. OECD, Statistical Office of the European Communities, Paris.
75. Parsons, T (1960), A sociological approach to the theory of organizations. In Parsons, T (Ed.), Structure and Process in Modern Societies, pp. 16-58. Glencoe: Free Press.
76. Paruchuri, S (2009). Intraorganizational networks, interorganizational networks, and the impact of central inventors: A longitudinal study of pharmaceutical firms. Organization Science, 1-18.
77. Pfeffer, J (1992). Managing with Power: Politics and Influence in Organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
78. Pfeffer, J and GR Salancik (1978). The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.
79. Pitelis, CN and DJ Teece (2009). The (new) nature and essence of the firm. European Management Review, 6(1), 5-15.
80. Pravdic, N and V Oluic-Vukovic (1986). Dual approach to multiple authorship in the study of collaboration/scientific output relationship. Scientometrics, 10, 259-280.
81. Powell, WW, KW Koput and L Smith-Doerr (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
82. Powell, WW and S Grodal (2005). Networks of innovators. In Fagerberg J, D Mowery and RR Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83. Pilkington, A, LL Lee, CK Chan and S Ramakrishna (2009). Defining key inventors: A comparison of fuel cell and nanotechnology industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(1), 118-127.
84. Raub, W and J Weesie (1990). Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology, 96(3), 626-654.
85. Reagans, R and EW Zuckerman (2001). Networks, diversity, and productivity: The social capital of corporate R&D teams, Organization Science, 12(4), 502-517.
86. Reitzig, M (2004). The private values of "thickets" and "fences": Towards an updated picture of the use of patents across industries. The Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 13(5), 457-476.
87. Ring, PS and AH Van De Ven (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483-498.
88. Rodrigues, CS, E Fernandes and FV Martins (2006). Innovativeness and network competence: An integration and empirical examination. 13th International Product Development Management Conference.
89. Rogers, E (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: The Free Press.
90. Rogers, E and F Shoemaker (1971). Communication of Innovations: A Cross Cultural Approach. New York: The Free Press.
91. Rowley, T, D Behrens and D Krackhardt (2000). Redundant governance structures: An analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 369-386.
92. Selznick, P (1957), Leadership in Administration: A Sociological Interpretation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
93. Singh, J (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756-770. (Pubitemid 40867142)
94. Sorenson, O (2003). Social networks and industrial geography. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13(5), 513-527. (Pubitemid 37545161)
95. Subramanian, A (1996). Innovativeness: Redefining the concept. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 13, 223-243. (Pubitemid 126361598)
96. Subramanyam, K (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6, 33-38. (Pubitemid 13574658)
97. Tsai, W (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996-1004.
98. Tsai, W and S Ghoshal (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
99. Tuominen, M, A Rajala and K Moller (2004). How does adaptability drive firm innova-tiveness? Journal of Business Research, 57, 495-506. (Pubitemid 38254318)
100. Tushman, ML (1979). Technical communication in research and development laboratories: Impact of project work characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 624-645.
101. Uzzi, B (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67. (Pubitemid 127172358)
102. Uzzi, B and J Spiro (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447-504. (Pubitemid 41810709)
103. Walker, G (1985). Network position and cognition in a computer software firm. Administration Science Quaterly, 30, 103-130.
104. Wilhelmsson, M (2007). How can research networks improve the innovation process? Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS), Working Paper Series in Economics and Institutions of Innovation, no. 108.
105. Williamson, OE (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
106. Williamson, OE (1993). Calculativeness, trust, and economic organization. Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 453-486.
107. Woodside, AG (2005). Firm orientations, innovativeness, and business performance: Advancing a system dynamics view following a comment on Hult, Hurley and Knight's 2004 study. Industrial Marketing Management, 32, 275-279. (Pubitemid 40518359)
108. Zucker, LG and MR Darby (1996). Stars scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the biotechnologies industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 12709-12716. (Pubitemid 26382707)