Sparse correlation coefficient for objective image quality assessment

Signal Processing: Image Communication

Volumn 26, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 577-588

  Chang, Hua Wen ^a   Wang, Ming Hui ^a  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Image quality assessment; Independent component analysis; Natural image statistics; Receptive field; Sparse coding

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENTS; NATURAL IMAGE STATISTICS; RECEPTIVE FIELDS; SPARSE CODING;

CORRELATION METHODS; DISCRETE COSINE TRANSFORMS; IMAGE QUALITY; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING; STATISTICS;

IMAGE CODING;

EID: 80055086240     PISSN: 09235965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.image.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Z. Wang, A. Bovik, H. Sheikh, and E. Simoncelli Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13 4 2004 600 612
2. Z. Wang, and A.C. Bovik Mean squared error: love it or leave it? A new look at signal fidelity measures IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 26 1 2009 98 117
3. H.R. Sheikh, A.C. Bovik, and G. de Veciana An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14 12 2005 2117 2128 (Pubitemid 41763727)
4. A.M. Eskicioglu, and P.S. Fisher Image quality measures and their performance IEEE Trans. Commun. 43 1995 2959 2965
5. S. Winkler, Visual quality assessment using a contrast gain control model, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing, September 1999, pp. 527532.
6. P. Marziliano, F. Dufaux, and S. Winkler Perceptual blur and ringing metrics: application to JPEG2000 Signal Process.: Image Commun. 19 2 2004 163 172
7. Z. Wang, and A. Bovik A universal image quality index IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 9 3 2002 81 84 (Pubitemid 34554870)
8. M.P. Sampat, Z. Wang, S. Gupta, A.C. Bovik, and M.K. Markey Complex wavelet structural similarity: a new image similarity index IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18 11 2009 2385 2401
9. A. Shnayderman, A. Gusev, and A.M. Eskicioglu An SVD-based grayscale image quality measure for local and global assessment IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 2 2006 422 429 (Pubitemid 43126167)
10. H.-S. Han, D.-O. Kim, and R.-H. Park Structural information-based image quality assessment using LU factorization IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 44 1 2009 165 171
11. H.R. Sheikh, and A.C. Bovik Image information and visual quality IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 2 2006 430 444 (Pubitemid 43126168)
12. M.J. Wainwright, and E.P. Simoncelli Scale Mixtures of Gaussians and the Statistics of Natural Images, in Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems S.A. Solla, T.K. Leen, K.R. Müller, Cambridge, MA vol. 12 2000 MIT Press 855 861
13. R.W. Buccigrossi, and E.P. Simoncelli Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8 12 1999 1688 1701 (Pubitemid 30527916)
14. D.M. Chandler, and S.S. Hemami VSNR: a wavelet-based visual signal-to-noise ratio for natural images IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16 9 2007 2284 2298 (Pubitemid 47316675)
15. S.S. Hemami, and A.R. Reibman No-reference image and video quality estimation: applications and human-motivated design Signal Process.: Image Commun. 25 7 2010 535 546
16. J. You Perceptual-based quality assessment for audio-visual services: a survey Signal Process. Image Commun. 25 7 2010 482 501
17. V. Laparra Divisive normalization image quality metric revisited J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27 4 2010 852 864
18. Lin Ma Visual horizontal effect for image quality assessment IEEE Signal Process. Lett. 17 2 2010 627 630
19. E.P. Simoncelli, and B.A. Olshausen Natural image statistics and neural representation Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 24 2001 1193 1216 (Pubitemid 32695258)
20. W.S. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes Annu. Rev. Psychol. 59 2008 167 192
21. D.J. Field Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 4 12 1987 2379 2394
22. A. Hyvarinen Statistical models of natural images and cortical visual representation Top. Cognitive Sci. 2 2010 251 264
23. B.A. Olshausen, and D.J. Field Emergence of simple-cell receptive field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images Nature 381 6583 1996 607 609 (Pubitemid 26177476)
24. B.A. Olshausen, and D.J. Field Natural image statistics and efficient coding Network-Comput. Neural Syst. 7 2 1996 333 339 (Pubitemid 126714799)
25. B.A. Olshausen, and D.J. Field Sparse coding with an overcomplete basis set: a strategy employed by V1? Vision Res. 37 23 1997 3311 3325 (Pubitemid 27493805)
26. W.E. Vinje, and J.L. Gallant Sparse coding and decorrelation in primary visual cortex during natural vision Science 287 5456 2000 1273 1276 (Pubitemid 30112150)
27. A.J. Bell, and T.J. Sejnowski An information maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution Neural Comput. 7 6 1995 1129 1159
28. P. Comon Independent component analysis - a new concept? Signal Process. 36 1994 287 314
29. T.W. Lee, M. Girolami, and T.J. Sejnowski Independent component analysis using an extended infomax algorithm for mixed subgaussian and supergaussian sources Neural Comput. 11 2 1999 417 441
30. A. Hyvarinen, J. Karhunen, and E. Oja Independent Component Analysis 2001 Wiley Interscience London
31. M.S. Lewicki, and B.A. Olshausen Probabilistic framework for the adaptation and comparison of image codes J. Opt. Soc. Am. A: Opt. Image Sci. Vision 16 7 1999 1587 1601 (Pubitemid 129308656)
32. M.A. Saad, A.C. Bovik, Natural motion statistics for no-reference video quality assessment, in: Proceedings of the QoMEX, 2009.
33. Y. Shi, Y. Ding, and J. Li An ICA-based approach for image quality assessment Proc. SPIE 7497 2009
34. R. Jenssen, and T. Eltoft Independent component analysis for texture segmentation Pattern Recognition 36 2003 2301 2315 (Pubitemid 36947214)
35. S. Winkler Digital Video Quality: Vision Models and Metrics 2005 Wiley
36. J.J. Atick Could information theory provide an ecological theory of sensory processing? Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 3 1992 213 251
37. D.H. Hubel, and T.N. Wiesel Receptive fields and functional architecture of monkey striate cortex J. Physiol. 195 1 1968 215 244
38. J.P. Jones, and L.A. Palmer An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex J. Neurophysiol. 58 6 1987 1233 1258 (Pubitemid 18023459)
39. A. Hyvarinen Fast and robust fixed-point algorithms for independent component analysis IEEE Trans. Neural Network 10 3 1999 626 634
40. H.B. Barlow Possible principles underlying the transformations of sensory messages W.A. Rosenblith, Sensory Communication 1961 MIT Press Cambridge 217 234
41. D.J. Field What is the goal of sensory coding? Neural Comput. 6 1994 559 601
42. H.R. Sheikh, Z. Wang, L. Cormack, A.C. Bovik, Live Image Quality Assessment Database Release 2, 2005 (Online). Available: 〈 http://live.ece.utexas.edu/research/quality 〉.
43. VQEG, Final report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment, March 2000. Available at: 〈 http://www.vqeg.org 〉.
44. VQEG, Final Report from the Video Quality Experts Group on the Validation of Objective Models of Video Quality Assessment, Phase II, August 2003. Available at: 〈 http://www.vqeg.org 〉.
45. A.M. Rohaly, P. Corriveau, J. Libert, et al., Video quality experts group: current results and future directions, in: Proceedings of the SPIE Visual Communications and Image Processing, Perth, Australia, vol. 4067, June 2123 2000, pp. 742753.
46. H.R. Sheikh, M.F. Sabir, and A.C. Bovik A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15 11 2006 3440 3451 (Pubitemid 44615139)
47. Z. Wang, E.P. Simoncelli, A.C. Bovik, Multi-scale structural similarity for image quality assessment, presented at the Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, November 2003.
48. D.L. Ruderman Statistics of cone responses to natural images: implications for visual coding J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 15 8 1998 2036 2045 (Pubitemid 128572171)
49. G. Buchsbaum, and A. Gottschalk Trichromacy, opponent color coding, and optimum colour information transmission in the retina Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 220 1983 89 113 (Pubitemid 14246257)
50. L. Itti, and C. Koch Computational modelling of visual attention Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2 3 2001 194 203 (Pubitemid 33673372)