Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 tesla

Acta Radiologica

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 813-817

  Li, Chunmei ^a   Chen, Min ^a   Li, Saying ^a   Zhao, Xuna ^b   Zhang, Chen ^a   Liu, Ming ^a   Zhou, Cheng ^a  

^a BEIJING HOSPITAL   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

3.0 T; Apparent diffusion coefficient; Diffusion tensor imaging; Fractional anisotropy; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

3.0 T; APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; PROSTATE CANCERS;

ANISOTROPY; BIOPSY; DISEASES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SEXTANTS; SURFACE DIFFUSION;

TENSORS;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROSTATE TUMOR; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; ANISOTROPY; AREA UNDER CURVE; BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 80055064714     PISSN: 02841851     EISSN: 16000455     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2011.100487     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57:43-66 (Pubitemid 46148091)
2. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, et al. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 2005;55:74-108 (Pubitemid 40372904)
3. Kurhanewicz J, Swanson MG, Nelson SJ, et al. Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:451-63 (Pubitemid 35167879)
4. Saito K, Kaminaga T, Muto S, et al. Clinical efficacy of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) in the diagnosis of localized prostate cancer. Anticancer Res 2008;28:1899-904 (Pubitemid 351892903)
5. Cirillo S, Petracchini M, Della Monica P, et al. Value of endorectal MRI and MRS in patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen levels and previous negative biopsies to localize peripheral zone tumours. Clin Radiol 2008;63:871-9
6. de Souza NM, Riches SF, Vanas NJ, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a potential non-invasive marker of tumour aggressiveness in localized prostate cancer. Clin Radiol 2008;63:774-82
7. Kim CK, Park BK, Lee HM, et al. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging for the prediction of prostate cancer location at 3T using a phased-array coil: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 2007;42:842-7 (Pubitemid 350126566)
8. Padhani AR, Hayes C, Landau S, et al. Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues. NMR Biomed 2002;15:143-53 (Pubitemid 34213404)
9. Padhani AR, Gapinski CJ, Macvicar DA, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. Clin Radiol 2000;55:99-109 (Pubitemid 32054531)
10. Sinha S, Sinha U. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med 2004;52:530-7 (Pubitemid 39108964)
11. Gibbs P, Pickles MD, Turnbull LW. Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41:185-8 (Pubitemid 44406217)
12. Manenti G, Carlani M, Mancino S, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer. Invest Radiol 2007;42:412-9 (Pubitemid 46788741)
13. Gürses B, Kabakci N, Kovanlikaya A, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the normal prostate at 3 Tesla. Eur Radiol 2008;18:716-21 (Pubitemid 351447776)
14. Takayama Y, Kishimoto R, Hanaoka S, et al. ADC value and diffusion tensor imaging of prostate cancer: changes in carbon-ion radiotherapy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27:1331-5 (Pubitemid 351770686)
15. Xu J, Humphrey PA, Kibel AS, et al. Magnetic resonance diffusion characteristics of histologically defined prostate cancer in humans. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:842-50
16. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;111:209-19 (Pubitemid 126758682)