Diffusion imaging of the prostate at 3.0 tesla

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 185-188

  Gibbs, Peter ^a,b   Pickles, Martin D ^a   Turnbull, Lindsay W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^b HULL ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diffusion imaging; Echo planar imaging; Prostate cancer

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CARCINOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE; PROSTATE TUMOR; ROC CURVE;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; ROC CURVE;

EID: 33646340710     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.rli.0000192418.30684.14     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and figures 2004. Available at http://www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/CAFF_finalPWSecured.pdf. Accessed October 24, 2005.
2. Beduschi M, Oesterling JE. Percent free prostate-specific antigen: the next frontier in prostate-specific antigen testing. Urology. 1998;51:98-109.
3. Liney GP, Lowry M, Turnbull LW, et al. Proton MR T2 maps correlate with the citrate concentration in the prostate. NMR Biomed. 1996;9:59-64.
4. Quint LE, van Erp JS, Bland PH, et al. Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radiology. 1991;179:837-842.
5. Sommer FG, Ngjiem HV, Herfkens R, et al. Determining the volume of prostatic carcinoma -value of MR imaging with an external-array coil. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:81-86.
6. Coakley FV, Kurhanewicz J, Lu Y, et al. Prostate cancer tumour volume: measurement with endorectal MR and MR spectroscopic imaging. Radiology. 2002;223:91-97.
7. Padhani AR, Gapinski CJ, MacVicar DA, et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MRI of prostate cancer: correlation with morphology and tumour stage, histological grade and PSA. Clin Radiol. 2000;55:99-109.
8. Kiessling F, Huber PE, Grobholz R, et al. Dynamic magnetic resonance tomography and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of prostate cancers in rats treated by radiotherapy. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:34-44.
9. Buckley DL, Roberts C, Khaki SK, et al. Characterisation of prostate cancer by quantitative MRI. In: Proc 12th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Kyoto, 2004. p 615.
10. Dodd NFJ, Zhao S. Early detection of tumour response to radiotherapy using MRI. Phys Med. 1997;13(Suppl 1):56-60.
11. Jennings D, Hatton BN, Guo J, et al. Early response of prostate carcinoma xenografts to docetaxel chemotherapy monitored with diffusion MRI. Neoplasia. 2002;4:255-262.
12. Plaks V, Koudinova N, Nevo U, et al. Photodynamic therapy of established prostatic adenocarcinoma with TOOKAD: a biphasic apparent diffusion coefficient change as potential early MRI response marker. Neoplasia. 2004;6:224-233.
13. Gibbs P, Tozer DJ, Liney GP, et al. Comparison of quantitative T2 mapping and diffusion weighted imaging in the normal and pathologic prostate. Magn Reson Med. 2001;46:1054-1058.
14. Issa B. In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo-planar imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:196-200.
15. Chan I, Wells W, Mulkern R, et al. Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a multichannel statistical classifier. Med Phys. 2003;30:2390-2398.
16. Hosseinzadeh K, Schwarz SD. Endorectal diffusion-weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:654-661.
17. Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Sreenivas M, et al. Diffusion weighted imaging of normal and pathological prostate tissue at 3.0 T. In: Proc 13th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Miami Beach, 2005. p. 1940.
18. Tozer DJ, Gibbs P, Turnbull LW. Investigation of anisotropy in the prostate using echo planar diffusion weighted imaging. In: Proc 8th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Denver, 2000 p. 1435.
19. Sinha S, Sinha U. In vivo diffusion tensor imaging of the human prostate. Magn Reson Med. 2004;52:530-537.
20. Futterer JJ, Scheenen TWJ, Huisman HJ, et al. Initial experience of 3 Tesla endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging and 1H spectroscopic imaging of the prostate. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:671-680.
21. Vigneron DB, Xu D, Chen AP, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the prostate using single shot fast spin-echo. In: Proc 10th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Hawaii, 2002. p. 457.
22. Chen AP, Xu D, Henry R, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the prostate following therapy. In: Proc 11th Annual Meeting ISMRM, Toronto, 2003. p. 579.