Comparison of two different suture methods in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty

Urologia Internationalis

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 304-308

  Shao, Pengfei ^a   Qin, Chao ^a   Ju, Xiaobing ^a   Meng, Xiaoxin ^a   Li, Jie ^a   Lv, Qiang ^a   Zhang, Wei ^a   Xu, Zhengquan ^a   Yin, Changjun ^a  

^a NANJING MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Laparoscopy; Pyeloplasty; Retroperitoneoscopy; Ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HYDRONEPHROSIS; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PYELOPLASTY; SCHOOL CHILD; STENT; SUTURING METHOD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY PELVIS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; SUTURE TECHNIQUES; SUTURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETERAL OBSTRUCTION; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 80055055021     PISSN: 00421138     EISSN: 14230399     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000329368     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Persky L, Krause JR, Boltuch RL: Initial complications and late results in dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1977; 118: 162-165.
2. Lowe FC, Marshall FF: Ureteropelvic junction obstruction in adults. Urology 1984; 23: 331-335.
3. O'Reilly PH, Brooman PJ, Mak S, et al: The long-term results of Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty. BJU Int 2001; 87: 287-289.
4. Schuessler WW, Grune MT, Tecuanhuey LV, et al: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. J Urol 1993; 150: 1795-1799.
5. Pattaras JG, Moore RG: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Endourol 2000; 14: 895-904.
6. Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Charambura TC, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: The first 100 cases. J Urol 2002; 167: 1253-1256.
7. Klingler HC, Remzi M, Janetschek G: Comparison of open versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty techniques in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Eur Urol 2003; 44: 340-345.
8. Abuanz S, Game X, Roche J, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Comparison between retroperitoneoscopic and transperitoneal approach. Urology 2010; 76: 877-881.
9. Eden CG: Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A critical analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007; 52: 983-989.
10. Van Cangh PJ, Nesa S, Galeon M, et al: Vessels around the ureteropelvic junction: Significance and imaging by conventional radiology. J Endourol 1996; 10: 111-119.
11. Eden C, Gianduzzo T, Chang C, et al: Extraperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary and secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. J Urol 2004; 172: 2308-2311.
12. Frauscher F, Janetschek G, Klauser A, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for UPJ obstruction with crossing vessels: Contrast-enhanced color Doppler findings and longterm outcome. Urology 2002; 59: 500-505.
13. Adams JB, Schulam PG, Moore RG, et al: New laparoscopic suturing device: Initial clinical experience. Urology 1995; 46: 242-245.
14. Moon DA, El-Shazly MA, Chang CM, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: Evolution of a new gold standard. Urology 2006; 67: 932-936.
15. Rassweiler JJ, Subotic S, Feist-Schwenk M, et al: Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: Long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. J Urol 2007; 177: 1000-1005.
16. Sun C, Xia G, Xu K, et al: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases). Urology 2009; 74: 1036-1041.
17. Wagner S, Greco F, Inferrera A, et al: Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: Technique and results in 105 patients. World J Urol 2010;28:615-618.
18. Srivastava A, Singh P, Maheshwari R, et al: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: A versatile alternative to open pyeloplasty. Urol Int 2009; 83: 420-424.
19. Rassweiler JJ, Teber D, Frede T: Complications of laparoscopic pyeloplasty. World J Urol 2008; 26: 539-547.