Preliminary results of BRAVO project: Brain computer interfaces for robotic enhanced action in Visuo-motOr tasks

IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Bergamasco, Massimo ^a   Frisoli, Antonio ^a   Fontana, Marco ^a   Loconsole, Claudio ^a   Leonardis, Daniele ^a   Troncossi, Marco ^b   Foumashi, Mohammad Mozaffari ^b   Parenti Castelli, Vincenzo ^b  

^a SCUOLA SUPERIORE SANT ANNA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Arm exoskeleton; Brain Computer Interface; Gaze Tracking; Hand exoskeleton; Upper limb

Indexed keywords

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ARM EXOSKELETON; ASSISTIVE; ASSISTIVE DEVICES; BRAIN ACTIVATION; EYE-TRACKING; FORCE SENSOR; GAZE TRACKING; HAND EXOSKELETON; MOTOR FUNCTION; ORTHOSIS; REHABILITATION THERAPY; REHABILITATIVE ROBOT; ROBOTIC INTERFACE; UPPER LIMBS; VISUOMOTORS;

EYE MOVEMENTS; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT TREATMENT; ROBOTIC ARMS; ROBOTICS;

BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE;

ARM; ARTICLE; BRAIN; COMPUTER INTERFACE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; ROBOTICS; STROKE;

BRAIN; HUMANS; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 80055034404     PISSN: 19457898     EISSN: 19457901     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2011.5975377     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Diller, L., Poststroke Rehabilitation Practice Guidelines. International Handbook of Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2000.
2. Butefisch, C., et al., Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci, 1995. 130(1): p. 59-68.
3. Olsen, T.S., Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 1990. 21(2): p. 247-251.
4. Prange, G.B., et al., Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2006. 43(2): p. 171-84.
5. Jack, D., et al., Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, IEEE Transactions on [see also IEEE Trans. on Rehabilitation Engineering], 2001. 9(3): p. 308-318.
6. Cardoso, L.S., et al., Using Virtual Environments for Stroke Rehabilitation. Virtual Rehabilitation, 2006 International Workshop on, 2006: p. 1-5.
7. Stewart, J.C., et al., Pilot Trial Results from A Virtual Reality System Designed to Enhance Recovery of Skilled Arm and Hand Movements after Stroke. Proceeding of the 5th International Workshop on Virutal Rehabilitation, New York, 2006.
8. Leigh, R.J. and D.S. Zee, The Neurology of Eye Movements. 1999: Oxford University Press.
9. Frisoli, A., Rocchi, F., Marcheschi, S., Dettori, A., Salsedo, F., and Bergamasco, M. (2005), "'A new force-feedback arm exoskeleton for haptic interaction in virtual environments"', Eurohaptics Conference, 2005 and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, 2005, World Haptics 2005. First Joint vol., no., pp. 195-201, 18-20 March 2005
10. Loconsole, C.; Bartalucci R.; Frisoli A.; Bergamasco M.; "An online trajectory planning method for visually guided assisted reaching through a rehabilitation robot", accepted for publication for Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2011 IEEE International Conference on, 9-13 May 2011
11. Rogers, J.C. and J.J. Figone (1980), "Traumatic quadriplegia: follow-up study of self-care skills", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 61(7): p. 316-21
12. Fontana, M.; Dettori, A.; Salsedo, F.; Bergamasco, M., "Mechanical design of a novel Hand Exoskeleton for accurate force displaying," Robotics and Automation, 2009. ICRA '09. IEEE International Conference on, vol., no., pp.1704-1709, 12-17 May 2009, ISBN 978-1-4244-2788-8.
13. S. Balasubramanian, J. Klein, E. Burdet, 2010, "Robot-assisted rehabilitation of hand function", Current Opinion in Neuorlogy, 23:661-670
14. Takahashi C.D., Der-Yeghiaian, V.H. Le, S.C. Cramer,. " A Robotic Device for Hand Motor Therapy After Stroke", Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, 2005, Chicago, IL, (USA), pp. 17-20
15. L. Lucas, M. DiCicco, and Y. Matsuoka,. "An EMG-Controlled Hand Exoskeleton for Natural Pinching", Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics, 16(5), 2004, pp. :1-7, 2004
16. M. Mulas, M. Folgheraiter and G. Gini,. "An EMG-controlled Exoskeleton for Hand Rehabilitation", Proceedings of the IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, June 28-July 1, 2005, Chicago, IL, (USA, ), pp. 371-374
17. A. Wege and G. Hommel, "Development and Control of a Hand Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation of Hand Injuries", Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE, International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, December 15-18, 2007, Sanya, China
18. Mozaffari M., Troncossi M., Parenti-Castelli V., 2010, "A Study on the Rehabilitation Hand Exoskeletons", Quaderni del DIEM-GMA. Atti della Terza Giornata di Studio Ettore Funaioli. 16 July, 2010, Bologna (Italy), IN PRESS
19. L.C. Wu, G. Carbone and M. Ceccarelli, 2009, "Designing an underactuated mechanism for a 1 active DoF finger operation", Mechanism and Machine Theory, Vol. 44, pp. 336-348.
20. L. Marchal-Crespo, D.J. Reinkensmeyer, Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2009.