How to calibrate the scores of biased reviewers by quadratic programming

Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Volumn 1, Issue , 2011, Pages 255-260

  Roos, Magnus ^a   Rothe, Jörg ^a   Scheuermann, Björn ^b  

^a HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCEPTANCE/REJECTION; CONFIDENCE LEVELS; JOURNAL EDITORS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATOR; PARTIAL INFORMATION; PROGRAM COMMITTEE; QUADRATIC PROGRAMS; REAL WORLD DATA;

MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 80055032109     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Conitzer, V., and Rothe, J., eds. 2010. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computational Social Choice. Universität Düsseldorf.
2. Conitzer, V., and Sandholm, T. 2005. Common voting rules as maximum likelihood estimators. In Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 145-152. AUAI Press.
3. Conitzer, V.; Rognlie, M.; and Xia, L. 2009. Preference functions that score rankings and maximum likelihood estimation. In Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 109-115. IJCAI.
4. Douceur, J. 2009. Paper rating vs. paper ranking. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 43:117-121.
5. Haenni, R. 2008. Aggregating referee scores: An algebraic approach. In Endriss, U., and Goldberg, P., eds., Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Computational Social Choice, 277-288. University of Liverpool.
6. Neumaier, A. 1998. MINQ - general definite and bound constrained indefinite quadratic programming. WWW document. http://www.mat.univie.ac.at/ ~neum/software/minq.
7. Nocedal, J., and Wright, S. 2006. Numerical Optimization. Springer Series in Operations Research and Financial Engineering. Springer, 2nd edition.
8. Pini, M.; Rossi, R; Venable, K.; and Walsh, T. 2009. Aggregating partially ordered preferences. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(3):475-502.
9. Scheuermann, B.; Kiess, W.; Roos, M.; Jarre, F.; and Mauve, M. 2009. On the time synchronization of distributed log files in networks with local broadcast media. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking 17(2):431-444.
10. Wright, S. 1997. Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods. SIAM.
11. Xia, L., and Conitzer, V. 2011. A maximum likelihood approach towards aggregating partial orders. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. IJCAI. To appear.
12. Xia, L.; Conitzer, V.; and Lang, J. 2010. Aggregating preferences in multi-issue domains by using maximum likelihood estimators. In Proceedings of the 9th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 399-408. IFAAMAS.