Linking summative assessments? Electronic feedback and feedforward in module design

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2011, Pages

  Tong, Vincent C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRONIC FEEDBACK; ELECTRONIC STUDIES; EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS; FEED-FORWARD; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; MODULE DESIGN; UNIVERSITY OF LONDON;

GEOPHYSICS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 80055019086     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01226.x     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Brown, S., (2007). Feedback and feed-forward. Centre for Bioscience Bulletin, The Higher Education Academy, 22.
2. Knight, P. T., (2002). Summative assessment in higher education: practices in disarray. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 275-286.
3. Nicol, D. J., &, Macfarlane-Dick, D., (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31, 199-218. (Pubitemid 43453822)
4. Ramaprasad, A., (1983). On the definition of feedback. Behavioural Science, 28, 4-13.
5. Ramsden, P., (2003). Learning to teach in higher education (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge Falmer.
6. Sadler, D. R., (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
7. Tong, C. H., (2005). Imaging sunspots using seismic methods. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 363, 2761-2775. (Pubitemid 41807965)
8. Tong, C. H., (2010). Let interdisciplinary research begin in undergraduate years. Nature, 364, 157.
9. Tong, V. C. H., (2011). Using asynchronous electronic surveys to help in-class revision: a case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01207.x.
10. Walker, M., (2009). An investigation into written comments on assignments: do students find them usable? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 67-78.