Using asynchronous electronic surveys to help in-class revision: A case study

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 465-473

  Tong, Vincent C H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

E-LEARNING PLATFORMS; E-VOTING SYSTEMS; ELECTRONIC SURVEY; ELECTRONIC VOTING; GOOD PRACTICES; INTERACTIVITY; SCIENCE MODULES; STUDENTS' LEARNING EXPERIENCES; TEACHING EVALUATION; VOTING SYSTEMS;

CURRICULA; E-LEARNING; SURVEYS; TEACHING; VOTING MACHINES;

STUDENTS;

EID: 80054993162     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2011.01207.x     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Baggaley, J., Kane, T., &, Wade, B., (2002). Online polling services. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3, #2, Technical Evaluation Report 12.
2. Baggaley, J. P., (1997). From Madison Avenue to the field: cross-cultural uses of media research technology. In, M. E. Goldberg, M. Fishbein, &, S. E. Middlestadt, (Eds), Social marketing theoretical and practical perspectives (pp. 75-90). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Draper, S., &, Brown, M., (2004). Increasing interactivity in lectures using an electronic voting system. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20, 81-94. (Pubitemid 38883623)
4. Draper, S. W., (2009). Catalytic assessment: understanding how MCQs and EVS can foster deep learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 285-293.
5. Easton, C., (2009). An examination of clicker technology use in legal education. Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT), 3. Retrieved 5 June 2011, from
6. Fies, C., &, Marshall, J., (2006). Classroom response systems: a review of the literature. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15, 1, 101-109. (Pubitemid 44757013)
7. Handverk, P., Carson, C., &, Blackwell, K., (2000). Online vs. paper-and-pencil surveying of students: a case study. AIR 20000 Annual Forum paper. ERIC Document #RIEAAPR2001.
8. Kay, R. H., &, LeSage, A., (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: a review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53, 819-827.
9. Klaas, J., (2003). Best practices in online polling. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4, #23.
10. Klaas, J., &, Baggaley, J, (2003). Online polling as collaborative tool. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4, #22.
11. Ko, S., &, Rossen, S., (2010). Teaching online: a practical guide (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
12. Moss, J., &, Hendry, G., (2002). Use of electronic surveys in course evaluation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 583-592.
13. Rosenblatt, A. J., (1999). On-line polling: methodological limitations and implications for electronic democracy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 4, 2, 30-44.
14. Solomon, D. J., (2001). Conducting web-based surveys. Office of Educational Research & Development. Washington DC. ERIC Document: 458291.
15. Stahl, B. C., (2005). E-voting: an example of collaborative e-teaching and e-learning. Interactive Technology & Smart Education, 2, 101-111.
16. Tong, C. H., (2010). Let interdisciplinary research begin in undergraduate years. Nature, 463, 157.
17. Wang, Y.-S., (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41, 75-86.