New approaches to the representationand analysis of phenotype knowledge in human diseases and their animalmodels

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 258-265

  Schofield, Paul N ^a,b   Sundberg, John P ^c   Hoehndorf, Robert ^a   Gkoutos, Georgios V ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEIPZIG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE

Author keywords

Animalmodel; Comparative phenomics; Database; Disease; Ontology; Phenotype

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; GENE; GENE FUNCTION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETIC DISORDER; HUMAN; LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION; NONHUMAN; PATHOGENESIS; PHENOTYPE; ANIMAL; DISEASE MODEL; DISEASES; GENETICS; GENOMICS; KNOWLEDGE; METHODOLOGY; MUTATION; REVIEW;

ANIMALS; DISEASE; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; GENOMICS; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MUTATION; PHENOTYPE;

EID: 80055017153     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elr031     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Al-Hasani K, Vadolas J, Knaupp AS, et al. A 191-kb genomic fragment containing the human alpha-globin locus can rescue alpha-thalassemic mice. Mamm Genome 2005;16: 847-53.
2. Nakatani J, Tamada K, Hatanaka F, etal. Abnormal behavior in a chromosome-engineered mouse model for human 15q11-13 duplication seen in autism. Cell 2009;137: 1235-46.
3. Wallace HA, Marques-Kranc F, Richardson M, et al. Manipulating the mouse genome to engineer precise functional syntenic replacements with human sequence. Cell 2007;128:197-209.
4. Zheng-Bradley X, Rung J, Parkinson H, et al. Large scale comparison of global gene expression patterns in human and mouse. Genome Biol 2010;11:R124.
5. Greep RO. Animal model in biomedical research. JAnim Sci 1970;31:1235-46.
6. Kljuic A, Bazzi H, Sundberg JP, et al. Desmoglein 4 in hair follicle differentiation and epidermal adhesion: evidence from inherited hypotrichosis and acquired pemphigus vulgaris. Cell 2003;113:249-60.
7. Sundberg JP, Price VH, King LE. The "hairless" gene in mouse and man. Arch Dermatol 1999;135:718-20.
8. Lisse TS, Thiele F, Fuchs H, et al. ER stress-mediated apoptosis in a new mouse model of osteogenesis imperfecta. PLoS Genet 2008;4:e7.
9. Rosenthal N, Brown S. The mouse ascending: perspectives for human-disease models. Nat Cell Biol 2007;9: 993-99.
10. Peters LL, Robledo RF, Bult CJ, et al. The mouse as a model for human biology: a resource guide for complex trait analysis. Nat Rev Genet 2007;8:58-69.
11. Sundberg JP. Mouse mutations: animal models and biomedical tools. Lab Anim 1991;20:40-9.
12. Zambrowicz BP, Sands AT. Knockouts model the 100 best-selling drugs-will they model the next 100? Nat Rev Drug Discov 2003;2:38-51.
13. Zambrowicz BP, Turner CA, Sands AT. Predicting drug efficacy: knockouts model pipeline drugs of the pharmaceutical industry. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2003;3:563-70.
14. Sutherland KD, Berns A. Cell of origin of lung cancer. Mol Oncol 2011;4:397-403.
15. Antony PM, Diederich NJ, Balling R. Parkinson's disease mouse models in translational research. Mamm Genome 2011;7-8:401-19.
16. Van Dam D, De Deyn PP. Animal models in the drug discovery pipeline for Alzheimer's disease. Br J Pharmacol 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.001299.x.
17. Blake JA, Bult CJ, Kadin JA, et al. The mouse genome database (MGD): premier model organism resource for mammalian genomics and genetics. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 39:D842-8.
18. Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, et al. Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;25:25-9.
19. Barbaric I, Miller G, Dear TN. Appearances can be deceiving: phenotypes of knockout mice. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 2007;6:91-103.
20. Barthold SW. Genetically altered mice: phenotypes, no phenotypes, and Faux phenotypes. Genetica 2004;122:75-88.
21. Kain K. The first transgenic mice: an interview with Mario Capecchi. Dis Model Mech 2008;1:197-201.
22. Tang T, Li L, Tang J, et al. A mouse knockout library for secreted and transmembrane proteins. Nat Biotechnol 2010; 28:749-55.
23. Wurst W, de Angelis MH. Systematic phenotyping of mouse mutants. Nat Biotechnol 2010;28:684-5.
24. Patrinos GP, Brookes AJ. DNA, diseases and databases: disastrously deficient. Trends Genet 2005;21:333-8.
25. Robinson PN, Kohler S, Bauer S, et al. The Human Phenotype Ontology: a tool for annotating and analyzing human hereditary disease. Am J Hum Genet 2008;83:610-5.
26. Allanson JE, Cunniff C, Hoyme HE, et al. Elements of morphology: standard terminology for the head and face. AmJMed Genet A 2009;149A:6-28.
27. Smith CL, Goldsmith CA, Eppig JT. The Mammalian Phenotype Ontology as a tool for annotating, analyzing and comparing phenotypic information. Genome Biol 2005;6:R7.
28. Amberger J, Bocchini C, Hamosh A. A new face and new challenges for Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM((R))). Hum Mutat 2011;32:564-7.
29. Oti M, Huynen MA, Brunner HG. The biological coherence of human phenome databases. Am J Hum Genet 2009; 85:801-8.
30. Bankier A, Keith CG. POSSUM: the microcomputer laser-videodisk syndrome information system. Op hthalmic Paediatr Genet 1989;10:51-2.
31. Weinreich SS, Mangon R, Sikkens JJ, et al. [Orphanet: a European database for rare diseases]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008;152:518-9.
32. Kitsios GD, Tangri N, Castaldi PJ, et al. Laboratory mouse models for the human genome-wide associations. PLoS One 2010;5:e13782.
33. Chen J, Xu H, Aronow BJ, et al. Improved human disease candidate gene prioritization using mouse phenotype. BMC Bioinformatics 2007;8:392.
34. Hindorff LA, Sethupathy P, Junkins HA, et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:9362-7.
35. Abbott A. Mouse project to find each gene's role. Nature 2010;465:410.
36. Bodenreider O. The Unified Medical Language System (UMLS): integrating biomedical terminology. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:D267-70.
37. McGary KL, Park TJ, Woods JO, et al. Systematic discovery of nonobvious human disease models through orthologous phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010;107:6544-9.
38. Espinosa O, Hancock JM. A gene-phenotype network for the laboratory mouse and its implications for systematic phenotyping. PLoS One;6:e19693.
39. Groth P, Pavlova N, Kalev I, et al. PhenomicDB: a new cross-species genotype/phenotype resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35:D696-9.
40. van Driel MA, Bruggeman J, Vriend G, et al. A text-mining analysis of the human phenome. Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14: 535-42.
41. Oti M, Brunner HG. The modular nature of genetic diseases. Clin Genet 2007;71:1-11.
42. Butte AJ, Kohane IS. Creation and implications of a phenome-genome network. Nat Biotechnol 2006;24:55-62.
43. Burgun A, Mougin F, Bodenreider O. Two approaches to integrating phenotype and clinical information. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2009;2009:75-9.
44. Allanson JE, Biesecker LG, Carey JC, et al. Elements of morphology: introduction. AmJMedGenetA 2009;149A:2-5.
45. Schofield PN, Gkoutos GV, Gruenberger M, et al. Phenotype ontologies for mouse and man: bridging the semantic gap. Dis Model Mech 2010;3:281-9.
46. Smith B, Ashburner M, Rosse C, et al. The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat Biotechnol 2007;25:1251-5.
47. Sardana D, Vasa S, Vepachedu N, et al. PhenoHM: human-mouse comparative phenome-genome server. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38:W165-74.
48. Gkoutos GV, Green ECJ, Mallon A-M, et al. Building mouse phenotype ontologies. Pac Symp Biocomput 2004;9: 178-89.
49. Mungall CJ, Gkoutos GV, Smith CL, et al. Integrating phenotype ontologies across multiple species. Genome Biol 2010;11:R2.
50. Bradford Y, Conlin T, Dunn N, et al. ZFIN: enhancements and updates to the Zebrafish Model Organism Database. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:D822-9.
51. Schofield PN, Gruenberger M, Sundberg JP. Pathbase and the MPATH ontology: community resources for mouse histopathology. Vet Pathol 2010;47:1016-20.
52. Haendel M, Gkoutos GV, Lewis SE, et al. Uberon:Towards a Comprehensive Multi-species Anatomy Ontology. Buffalo, NY: International Consortium of Biomedical Ontology, 2009.
53. Washington NL, Haendel MA, Mungall CJ, et al. Linking human diseases to animal models using ontology-based phenotype annotation. PLoS Biol 2009;7:e1000247.
54. Hoehndorf R, Schofield PN, Gkoutos GV. PhenomeNET: a whole-phenome approach to disease gene discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 2011; 1-12.
55. Hoehndorf R, Dumontier M, Oellrich A, et al. Interoperability between biomedical ontologies through relation expansion, upper-level ontologies and automatic reasoning. PLoS One 2011;6:7.
56. Wilkinson M, McCarthy L, Vandervalk B, et al. SADI, SHARE, and the in silico scientific method. BMC Bioinformatics 2011(Suppl. 12):S7.
57. Loscalzo J, Kohane I, Barabasi AL. Human disease classification in the postgenomic era: a complex systems approach to human pathobiology. Mol Syst Biol 2007;3:124.
58. Scheuermann RH, Ceusters W, Smith B. Toward an ontological treatment of disease and diagnosis. SummitTranslat Bioinforma 2009;116-20.