The use of a guide catheter extension system as an aid during transradial percutaneous coronary intervention of coronary artery bypass grafts

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 78, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 847-863

  Farooq, Vasim ^a   Mamas, Mamas A ^a   Fath Ordoubadi, Farzin ^a   Fraser, Douglas G ^a  

^a MANCHESTER ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

backup support; coronary artery bypass graft; guide catheter extension system; stent delivery; transradial PCI

Indexed keywords

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME; ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTERY CATHETER; ARTERY CATHETERIZATION; ARTICLE; CARDIOVASCULAR EFFECT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; DEVICE SAFETY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT SAFETY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; VASCULAR ACCESS;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CATHETERS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ENGLAND; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GRAFT OCCLUSION, VASCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIAL ARTERY; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; STENTS; SUCTION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80055015000     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: 1522726X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.22942     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Rao SV, Ou FS, Wang TY, Roe MT, Brindis R, Rumsfeld JS, Peterson ED,. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: A report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 1: 379-386.
2. Agostoni P, Biondi-Zoccai GG, de Benedictis ML, Rigattieri S, Turri M, Anselmi M, Vassanelli C, Zardini P, Louvard Y, Hamon M,. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: Systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004; 44: 349-356. (Pubitemid 38950594)
3. Jaffe R, Hong T, Sharieff W, Chisholm RJ, Kutryk MJ, Charron T, Cheema AN,. Comparison of radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69: 815-820. (Pubitemid 46867482)
4. Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, Klinke WP, Carere RG, Pi D, Berry B, Hilton JD,. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: The M.O.R.T.A.L study (mortality benefit of reduced transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart 2008; 94: 1019-1025. (Pubitemid 352039884)
5. Louvard Y, Benamer H, Garot P, Hildick-Smith D, Loubeyre C, Rigattieri S, Monchi M, Lefevre T, Hamon M,. Comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary angiography and angioplasty in octogenarians (the OCTOPLUS study). Am J Cardiol 2004; 94: 1177-1180. (Pubitemid 39424225)
6. Mann T, Cubeddu G, Bowen J, Schneider JE, Arrowood M, Newman WN, Zellinger MJ, Rose GC,. Stenting in acute coronary syndromes: A comparison of radial versus femoral access sites. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 32: 572-576. (Pubitemid 28435238)
7. Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR,. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J 2009; 157: 132-140.
8. Mann T,. Transradial access: Just do it! J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009; 2: 1065-1066.
9. Dehghani P, Mohammad A, Bajaj R, Hong T, Suen CM, Sharieff W, Chisholm RJ, Kutryk MJB, Fam NP, Cheema AN,. Mechanism and predictors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2009; 2: 1057-1064.
10. Ikari Y, Nagaoka M, Kim JY, Morino Y, Tanabe T,. The physics of guiding catheters for the left coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2005; 17: 636-641.
11. Ikari Y, Masuda N, Matsukage T, Ogata N, Nakazawa G, Tanabe T, Morino Y,. Backup force of guiding catheters for the right coronary artery in transfemoral and transradial interventions. J Invasive Cardiol 2009; 21: 570-574.
12. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S,. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999; 46: 173-178. (Pubitemid 29066623)
13. Lawrie GM, Morris GC Jr, Chapman DW, Winters WL, Lie JT,. Patterns of patency of 596 vein grafts up to seven years after aorta-coronary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1977; 73: 443-448. (Pubitemid 8056453)
14. Mamas MA, Eichhofer J, Hendry C, El-Omar M, Clarke B, Neyses L, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser D,. Use of the Heartrail II catheter as a distal stent delivery device: An extended case series. EuroIntervention 2009; 5: 265-271.
15. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser D,. Successful use of the Heartrail III catheter as a stent delivery catheter following failure of conventional techniques. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2008; 71: 358-363. (Pubitemid 351428155)
16. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser D,. Telescoping catheter technique: Looking towards the kidneys. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv (in press).
17. Brilakis ES, Banerjee S,. Novel uses of the Proxis embolic protection catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74: 438-445.
18. Banerjee S, Brilakis ES,. Use of the Proxis embolic protection device for guide anchoring and stent delivery during complex saphenous vein graft interventions. Cardiovasc Revasc Med 2009; 10: 183-187.
19. Satler LF,. Importance of creativity: New applications of the Proxis catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009; 74: 446-447.
20. Mauri L, Cox D, Hermiller J, Massaro J, Wahr J, Tay SW, Jonas M, Popma JJ, Pavliska J, Wahr D, et al. The PROXIMAL trial: Proximal protection during saphenous vein graft intervention using the Proxis embolic protection system: A randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50: 1442-1449. (Pubitemid 47494591)
21. Mamas MA, Fath-Ordoubadi F, Fraser DG,. Distal stent delivery with guideliner catheter: First in man experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 76: 102-111.
22. Takahashi S, Saito S, Tanaka S, Miyashita Y, Shiono T, Arai F, Domae H, Satake S, Itoh T,. New method to increase a backup support of a 6 French guiding coronary catheter. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2004; 63: 452-456. (Pubitemid 39578507)
23. Moris C, Lozano I, Martin M, Rondan J, Avanzas P,. Embolic protection devices in saphenous percutaneous intervention. EuroIntervention 2009; 5 (Suppl D): D45-D50.
24. Brosh D, Assali AR, Mager A, Porter A, Hasdai D, Teplitsky I, Rechavia E, Fuchs S, Battler A, Kornowski R,. Effect of no-reflow during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction on six-month mortality. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 442-445. (Pubitemid 46223482)
25. Baim DS, Wahr D, George B, Leon MB, Greenberg J, Cutlip DE, Kaya U, Popma JJ, Ho KK, Kuntz RE,. Randomized trial of a distal embolic protection device during percutaneous intervention of saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2002; 105: 1285-1290. (Pubitemid 34260417)
26. Webb LA, Dixon SR, Safian RD, O'Neill WW,. Usefulness of embolic protection devices during saphenous vein graft intervention in a nonselected population. J Interv Cardiol 2005; 18: 73-75. (Pubitemid 40676853)
27. Mamas MA, Fraser D, Fath-Ordoubadi F,. The role of thrombectomy and distal protection devices during percutaneous coronary interventions. EuroIntervention 2008; 4: 115-123.
28. Stone GW, Rogers C, Hermiller J, Feldman R, Hall P, Haber R, Masud A, Cambier P, Caputo RP, Turco M, et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection with a filter-based catheter and a balloon occlusion and aspiration system during percutaneous intervention of diseased saphenous vein aorto-coronary bypass grafts. Circulation 2003; 108: 548-553. (Pubitemid 36961168)
29. Schluter M, Chevalier B, Seth A, Bach R, Farah B, Hauptmann KE, Grube E, Schofer J,. Saphenous vein graft stenting using a novel filter device for distal protection. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 736-739. (Pubitemid 36287472)