New method to increase a backup support of a 6 french guiding coronary catheter

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 63, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 452-456

  Takahashi, Saeko ^a   Saito, Shigeru ^a   Tanaka, Shinji ^a   Miyashita, Yusuke ^a   Shiono, Takaaki ^a   Arai, Fumio ^a   Domae, Hiroshi ^a   Satake, Shutaro ^a   Itoh, Takenari ^b  

^a SHONAN KAMAKURA GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b TERUMO CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

6 Fr guiding catheter; Backup support; Chronic total occlusion; Five in six system

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; BALLOON CATHETER; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CORONARY STENT; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REVIEW; RIGHT CORONARY ARTERY;

ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY DISEASE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 9644276998     PISSN: 15221946     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ccd.20223     Document Type: Review

References (12)

1. Saito S, Ikei H, Hosokawa G, Tanaka S. Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;46:173-178.
2. Kiemeneij F, Laarman GJ, Odekerken D, Slagboom T, van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:1269-1275.
3. Talley JD, Mauldin PD, Becker ER. A prospective randomized trial comparing the benefits and limitations of 6Fr and 8Fr guiding catheters in elective coronary angioplasty: clinical, procedural, angiographic, and economic end points. J Interv Cardiol 1995;8:345-353.
4. Metz D, Meyer P, Touati C, Coste P, Petiteau PY, Durand P, Faivre R, Lefevre T, Elaerts J. Comparison of 6F with 7F and 8F guiding catheters for elective coronary angioplasty: results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Am Heart J 1997;134:131-137.
5. Saito S, Tanaka S, Hiroe Y, Miyashita Y, Takahashi S, Satake S, Tanaka K. Angioplasty for chronic total occlusion by using tapered-tip guidewires. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:305-311.
6. Bartorelli AL, Lavarra F, Trabattoni D, Fabbiocchi F, Loaldi A, Galli S, Montorsi P. Successful stent delivery with deep seating of 6 French guiding catheters in difficult coronary anatomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 1999;48:279-284.
7. Peels HO, van Boven AJ, den Heijer P, Tio RA, Lie KI, Crijns HJ. Deep seating of six French guiding catheters for delivery of new Palmaz-Schatz stents. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;38:210-213.
8. Saucedo JF, Muller DW, Moscucci M. Facilitated advancement of the Palmaz-Schatz stent delivery system with the use of an adjacent 0.018″ stiff wire. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1996;39:106-110.
9. Fujita S, Tamai H, Kyo E, Kosuga K, Hata T, Okada M, Nakamura T, Tsuji T, Takeda S, Bin Hu F, Masunaga N, Motohara S, Uehata H. New technique for superior guiding catheter support during advancement of a balloon in coronary angioplasty: the anchor technique. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2003;59:482-488.
10. Mehta S, Margolis JR, Traktman M, Kramer B, Trautwein R, Gasso J, Nader R. Voda guiding catheter is superior to amplatz guiding catheter for performing left circumflex PTCA. J Invas Cardiol 1994;6:229-233.
11. Hoang V, Urban P, Chatelain P, Metz D, Camenzind E, Brzostek T, Rutishauser W. Randomized evaluation of six French voda-type guiding catheters for left coronary artery balloon angioplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1995;35:53-56.
12. Abhaichand RK, Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC. Amplatzing a 6 Fr Judkins right guiding catheter for increased success in complex right coronary artery anatomy. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001;53:405-409.