Systems approaches to modelling pathways and networks

Briefings in Functional Genomics

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 266-279

  Pfau, Thomas ^a   Christian, Nils ^a   Ebenhöh, Oliver ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Constraint based modelling; Dynamic systems; Genome scale networks; Mathematicalmodel; Metabolism; Systems biology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GENE REGULATORY NETWORK; GENOME ANALYSIS; LARGE SCALE PRODUCTION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL MODEL; THEORETICAL MODEL; THERMODYNAMICS;

HUMANS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 80054983940     PISSN: 20412649     EISSN: 20412657     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bfgp/elr022     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Amigó JM, Glvez J, Villar VM. A review on molecular topology: applying graph theory to drug discovery and design. Naturwissenschaften 2009;96(7):749-61.
2. Gillespie DT. Exact stochastic simulation of coupled chemical reactions. J Phys Chem 1977;81(25):2340-61.
3. Ullah M, Wolkenhauer O. Stochastic approaches in systems biology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med 2010; 2(4):385-97.
4. Verhulst PF. Notice sur la loi que la population poursuit dans son accroissement. Correspondance mathmatique et physique 1838;10:113-21.
5. Zuraw K. Probabilistic Linguistics. chapter 5: Probability in Language Change. Cambridge, MA, USA: The MIT Press, 2003:139-76.
6. Boggy GJ, Woolf PJ. A mechanistic model of PCR for accurate quantification of quantitative PCR data. PLoS ONE 2010;5(8):e12355.
7. Lotka AJ. Analytical note on certain rhythmic relations in organic systems. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 1920;6(7):410-5.
8. Volterra V. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero dindividui in specie animali conviventi. Mem Acad Lincei Roma 1926;2: 31-113.
9. Berryman AA. The origin and evolutoin of predator-prey theory. Ecology 1992;73:1530-5.
10. Brauer F, Castillo-Chavez C. Mathematical Models in Population Biology and Epidemiology. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2000.
11. Michaelis L, Menten M. Kinetik der Invertinwirkung. Biochem. Z 1913;49:333-369.
12. Garfinkel D, Hess B. Metabolic control mechanisms. VII.A detailed computer model of the glycolytic pathway in Ascites cells. J Biol Chem 1964;239:971-83.
13. Locke JCW, Kozma-Bognr L, Gould PD, et al. Experimental validation of a predicted feedback loop in the multi-oscillator clock of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Syst Biol 2006;2:59.
14. Rapoport TA, Heinrich R, Rapoport SM. The regulatory principles of glycolysis in erythrocytes in vivo and in vitro. Biochem J 1976;154(2):449-69.
15. Sel'kov EE. Self-oscillations in glycolysis. 1. A simple kinetic model. EurJ Biochem 1968;4(1):79-86.
16. Goodwin BC. Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. Adv Enzyme Regul 1965;3:425-38.
17. Kacser H, Burns JA. The control of flux. Symp Soc Exp Biol 1973;27:65-104.
18. Heinrich R, Rapoport TA. A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. General properties, control and effector strength. EurJ Biochem 1974;42(1):89-95.
19. Heinrich R, Schuster S. The Regulation of Cellular Systems. London, UK: Chapman & Hall, 1996.
20. Heinrich R, Rapoport TA. A linear steady-state treatment of enzymatic chains. Critique of the crossover theorem and a general procedure to identify interaction sites with an effector. EurJ Biochem 1974b;42(1):97-105.
21. Schuster S, Höfer T. Determining all extreme semi-positive conservation relations in chemical reaction systems: a test criterion for conservativity. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans 1991;87:2561-6.
22. Pfeiffer T, Sánchez-Valdenebro I, Nuo JC, et al. Metatool: for studying metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 1999; 15(3):251-7.
23. Poolman MG, Sebu C, Pidcock MK, etal. Modular decomposition of metabolic systems via null-space analysis. J Theor Biol 2007;249(4):691-705.
24. Schuster S, Hilgetag C. On elementary flux modes in biochemical reaction systems at steady state. J Biol Syst 1994; 2(2):165-82.
25. Schuster S, Dandekar T, Fell DA. Detection of elementary flux modes in biochemical networks: a promising tool for pathway analysis and metabolic engineering. Trends Biotechnol 1999;17(2):53-60.
26. de Figueiredo LF, Schuster S, Kaleta C, et al. Can sugars be produced from fatty acids? A test case for pathway analysis tools. Bioinformatics 2009a;25(1):152-8.
27. Schilling CH, Letscher D, Palsson BO. Theory for the systemic definition of metabolic pathways and their use in interpreting metabolic function from a pathway-oriented perspective. J Theor Biol 2000;203(3):229-8.
28. Schilling CH, Covert MW, Famili I, et al. Genome-scale metabolic model of Helicobacter pylori 26695. J Bacteriol 2002;184(16):4582-93.
29. Jevremovic D, Trinh CT, Srienc F, et al. On algebraic properties of extreme pathways in metabolic networks. J Comput Biol 2010;17(2):107-19.
30. Klamt S, Gilles ED. Minimal cut sets in biochemical reaction networks. Bioinformatics 2004;20(2):226-34.
31. Klamt S. Generalized concept of minimal cut sets in biochemical networks. Biosystems 2006;83(2-3):233-47.
32. Klamt S, Stelling J. Combinatorial complexity of pathway analysis in metabolic networks. Mol Biol Rep 2002; 29(1-2):233-6.
33. Schuster R, Schuster S. Refined algorithm and computer program for calculating all non-negative fluxes admissible in steady states of biochemical reaction systems with or without some flux rates fixed. Comput Appl Biosci 1993; 9(1):79-85.
34. de Figueiredo LF, Podhorski A, Rubio A, et al. Computing the shortest elementary flux modes in genome-scale metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 2009b;25(23):3158-65.
35. Gianchandani EP, Chavali AK, Papin JA. The application of flux balance analysis in systems biology. Wiley InterdiscipRev Syst Biol Med 2010;2(3):372-82.
36. Ruppin E, Papin JA, de Figueiredo LF, et al. Metabolic reconstruction, constraint-based analysis and game theory to probe genome-scale metabolic networks. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2010;21(4):502-10.
37. Dantzig GB, Orden A, Wolfe PS. Notes on Linear Programming: Part I: The Generalized Simplex Method for Minimizing a Linear Form Under Linear Inequality Restraints. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND Corporation, 1954.
38. Edwards JS, Palsson BO. The Escherichia coli MG1655 in silico metabolic genotype: its definition, characteristics, and capabilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97(10):5528-33.
39. Feist AM, Palsson BO. The biomass objective function. Curr OpinMicrobiol 2010;13(3):344-9.
40. Ramakrishna R, Edwards JS, McCulloch A, et al. Flux-balance analysis of mitochondrial energy metabolism: consequences of systemic stoichiometric constraints. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2001;280(3):R695- R704.
41. Dauner M, Sauer U. Stoichiometric growth model for riboflavin-producing Bacillus subtilis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2001;76(2):132-43.
42. Ebenhöh O, Heinrich R. Evolutionary optimization of metabolic pathways. Theoretical reconstruction of the stoichiometry of ATP and NADH producing systems. Bull Math Biol 2001;63(1):21-55.
43. Poolman MG, Miguet L, Sweetlove LJ, et al. A genome-scale metabolic model of Arabidopsis and some of its properties. Plant Physiol 2009;151(3):1570-81.
44. Blank LM, Kuepfer L, Sauer U. Large-scale 13C-flux analysis reveals mechanistic principles of metabolic network robustness to null mutations in yeast. Genome Biol 2005; 6(6):R49.
45. Williams TCR, Poolman MG, Howden AJM, et al. A genome-scale metabolic model accurately predicts fluxes in central carbon metabolism under stress conditions. Plant Physiol 2010;154(1):311-23.
46. Grötschel M, Lovász L, Schrijver A. GeometricAlgorithms and Combinatorial Optimization. 1993; Vol. 2 Algorithms and Combinatorics, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer (second corrected edition).
47. Lee S, Phalakornkule C, Domach MM, et al. Recursive MILP model for finding all the alternate optima in LP models for metabolic networks. Comput Chem Eng 2000; 24(2-7):711-6.
48. Murabito E, Simeonidis E, Smallbone K, et al. Capturing the essence of a metabolic network: a flux balance analysis approach. J Theor Biol 2009;260(3):445-52.
49. Kruse K, Ebenhöh O. Comparing flux balance analysis to network expansion: producibility, sustainability and the scope of compounds. Genome Inform 2008;20:91-101.
50. Benyamini T, Folger O, Ruppin E, et al. Flux balance analysis accounting for metabolite dilution. Genome Biol 2010; 11(4):R43.
51. Segrè D, Vitkup D, Church GM. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. ProcNatAcad Sci USA 2002;99(23):15112-7.
52. Shlomi T, Berkman O, Ruppin E. Regulatory on/off minimization of metabolic flux changes after genetic perturbations. ProcNatl Acad SciUSA 2005;102(21):7695-700.
53. Burgard AP, Pharkya P, Maranas CD. Optknock: a bilevel programming framework for identifying gene knockout strategies for microbial strain optimization. Biotechnol Bioeng 2003;84(6):647-57.
54. Tepper N, Shlomi T. Predicting metabolic engineering knockout strategies for chemical production: accounting for competing pathways. Bioinformatics 2010;26(4):536-43.
55. Beard DA, dan Liang S, Qian H. Energy balance for analysis of complex metabolic networks. Biophys J 2002;83(1):79-86.
56. Henry CS, Broadbelt LJ, Hatzimanikatis V. Thermodynamics-based metabolic flux analysis. Biophys J 2007;92(5):1792-805.
57. Hoppe A, Hoffmann S, Holzhütter HG. Including metabolite concentrations into flux balance analysis: thermodynamic realizability as a constraint on flux distributions in metabolic networks. BMCSyst Biol 2007;1:23.
58. Fleming RMT, Thiele I, Provan G, et al. Integrated stoichiometric, thermodynamic and kinetic modelling of steady state metabolism. J Theor Biol 2010;264:683-92.
59. Yizhak K, Benyamini T, Liebermeister W, et al. Integrating quantitative proteomics and metabolomics with a genome-scale metabolic network model. Bioinformatics 2010;26(12):i255-60.
60. Jerby L, Shlomi T, Ruppin E. Computational reconstruction of tissue-specific metabolic models: application to human liver metabolism. Mol Syst Biol 2010;6:401.
61. Feist AM, Palsson BO. The growing scope of applications of genome-scale metabolic reconstructions using escherichia coli. Nat Biotechnol 2008;26(6):659-7.
62. Fell DA, Poolman MG, Gevorgyan A. Building and analysing genome-scale metabolic models. Biochem SocTrans 2010; 38(5):1197-201.
63. Liolios K, Chen IMA, Mavromatis K, et al. The Genomes On Line Database (GOLD) in 2009: status of genomic and metagenomic projects and their associated metadata. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(Database issue):D346-54.
64. Ebenhöh O, Handorf T, Heinrich R. Structural analysis of expanding metabolic networks. Genome Inform 2004; 15(1):35-45.
65. Handorf T, Ebenhöh O, Heinrich R. Expanding metabolic networks: scopes of compounds, robustness, and evolution. J Mol Evol 2005;61(4):498-512.
66. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Furumichi M, et al. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 2010;38(Database issue):D355-60.
67. Caspi R, Altman T, Dale JM, et al. The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38(Database issue):D473-9.
68. Handorf T, Ebenhöh O. Meta Path Online: a web server implementation of the network expansion algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res 2007;35(Database issue):W613-W8.
69. Ebenhöh O, Handorf T. Functional classification of genome-scale metabolic networks. EURASIP J Bioinform Syst Biol 2009, 570456.
70. Handorf T, Christian N, Ebenhöh O, etal. An environmental perspective on metabolism. J Theor Biol 2008; 252(3):530-7.
71. Christian N, May P, Kempa S, etal. An integrative approach towards completing genome-scale metabolic networks. Mol Biosyst 2009;5(12):1889-903.
72. May P, Wienkoop S, Kempa S, et al. Metabolomics- and proteomics-assisted genome annotation and analysis of the draft metabolic network of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics 2008;179(1):157-66.
73. Reed JL, Patel TR, Chen KH, et al. Systems approach to refining genome annotation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006; 103(46):17480-4.
74. Raymond J, Segrè D. The effect of oxygen on biochemical networks and the evolution of complex life. Science 2006; 311(5768):1764-7.
75. Schütte M, Skupin A, Segrè D, et al. Modeling the complex dynamics of enzyme-pathway coevolution. Chaos 2010; 20(4):045115.
76. Schrödinger E. What is life? Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1944.
77. Hucka M, Finney A, Sauro HM, et al. The systems biology markup language (SBML): a medium for representation and exchange of biochemical network models. Bioinformatics 2003;19(4):524-31.
78. Novère NL, Finney A, Hucka M, et al. Minimum information requested in the annotation of biochemical models (miriam). Nat Biotechnol 2005;23(12):1509-15.
79. Baldazzi V, Ropers D, Markowicz Y, et al. The carbon assimilation network in escherichia coli is densely connected and largely sign-determined by directions of metabolic fluxes. PLoS Comput Biol 2010;6(6):e1000812.
80. Samal A, Jain S. The regulatory network of E. coli metabolism as a boolean dynamical system exhibits both homeostasis and flexibility of response. BMCSyst Biol 2008;2:21.
81. Chandrasekaran S, Price ND. Probabilistic integrative modeling of genome-scale metabolic and regulatory networks in Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad SciUSA 2010;107(41):17845-50.