Teachers' learning while constructing technology-based instructional resources

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 950-961

  Polly, Drew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS; INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS; INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES; PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; PROFESSIONAL LEARNING; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; TECHNOLOGY-BASED;

TEACHING;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 80054967240     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01161.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barbour, M. K., Rieber, L. P., Thomas, G. B., &, Rauscher, D., (2009). Homemade PowerPoint Games: a constructionist alternative to WebQuests. TechTrends, 53, 5, 54-59. DOI:10.1007/s11528-009-0326-2.
2. Coffey, A., &, Atkinson, P., (1996). Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Fishman, B. J., Marx, R. W., Best, S., &, Tal, R. T., (2003). Linking teachers and student learning to improve professional development in systemic reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 6, 643-658. (Pubitemid 36977243)
4. Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Briman, B., &, Yoon, K., (2001). What makes professional development effective? Analysis of a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 4, 915-945. (Pubitemid 33590046)
5. Glazer, E. M., Hannafin, M. J., Polly, D., &, Rich, P., (2009). Factors and interactions influencing technology integration during situated professional development in an elementary school. Computers in Schools, 26, 1, 21-39.
6. Guskey, T. R., (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7. Harel, I., &, Papert, S., (Eds) (1991). Constructionism. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
8. Hawley, W. D., &, Valli, L., (1999). The Essentials of Effective Professional Development. In, L. Darling-Hammond, &, G. Sykes, (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (p. 127-150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9. Hord, S. M., (2004). Learning together leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities. Oxford, OH: Teachers College Press.
10. Hughes, J. E., (2010, May). Evidence of TPACK in preservice graduates' rationales for future technology use. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Denver, CO.
11. Kafai, Y., &, Resnick, M., (Eds) (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Lawless, K. A., &, Pellegrino, J. W., (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 4, 575-614.
13. Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., &, Hewson, P. W., (2009). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
14. Mishra, P., &, Koehler, M. J., (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108, 6, 1017-1054. (Pubitemid 43824310)
15. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching (NPEAT) (2000). Revisioning professional development: What learner-centered professional development looks like. Oxford, OH: Author. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from
16. Niess, M. L., (2005). Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 509-523. (Pubitemid 40742612)
17. Niess, M. L., (2010, May). Using classroom artifacts to judge teacher knowledge of reform-based instructional practices That integrate technology in mathematics and science classrooms. Paper presented at the 2010 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Denver, CO.
18. Pink, W. T., &, Hyde, A. A., (1992). Doing effective staff development. In, W. T. Pink, &, A. A. Hyde, (Eds), Effective staff development for school change (pp. 5-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
19. Polly, D., (2006). Participants' focus in a learner-centered technology-rich mathematics professional development program. The Mathematics Educator, 16, 1, 14-21.
20. Polly, D., &, Hannafin, M. J., (2010). Reexamining technology's role in learner-centered professional development. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 5, 557-571.
21. Polly, D., &, Hannafin, M. J., (in press). Examining how learner-centered professional development influences teachers' espoused and enacted practices. Journal of Educational Research.
22. Polly, D., &, Mims, C., (2009). Designing professional development to support teachers' TPACK and integration of Web 2.0 technologies. In, T. Kidd, &, I. Chen, (Eds), Wired for Learning: Web 2.0 Guide for Educators, (pp. 301-316). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
23. Ravitz, J., &, Hoadley, C., (2005). Supporting change and scholarship through review of online resources in professional development settings. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 6, 957-974. (Pubitemid 43906746)
24. Schmidt, D., Baran, E., Thompson, A., Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., &, Shin, T., (2009). Reference Library-TPCK. Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): The development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA. Retrieved April 29, 2010, from.
25. Schrum, L., (1999). Technology professional development for teachers. Educational Technology Research and Development. 47, 4, 83-90.
26. Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W.-Y., Scarloss, B., &, Shapley, K., (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2007-No. 033). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest. Retrieved December 31, 2008, from:.