Pasture for horses: An underestimated land use class in an urbanized and multifunctional area

International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 195-211

  Bomans, K ^a   Dewaelheyns, V ^a   Gulinck, H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Internet survey; Land use; Land use change; Multifunctionality; Pasture for horses; Urban areas

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054914521     PISSN: 17437601     EISSN: 1743761X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2495/SDP-V6-N2-195-211     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Verburg, P.H., van de Steeg, J., Veldkamp, A. & Willemen, L., From land cover change to land function dynamics: a major challenge to improve land characterization. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(3), pp. 1327-1335, 2009. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.005
2. Myhr, U. & Johansson, R., EcoEffect for outdoor environments, the process of tool development. Environmental Impact Assessment, 28(7), pp. 439-454, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2007.09.001
3. Saifi, B. & Drake, L., Swedish agriculture during the twentieth century in relation to sustainability. Ecological Economics, 68(1-2), pp. 370-380, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.04.003
4. Viaene, J., Gellynck, X. & De Belder, T., Het economische belang van de paardensector. Universiteit van Gent. Faculteit landbouw en toegepaste biologische wetenschappen. In opdracht van de Belgische Confederatie van het Paard, pp. 1-78, 2003.
5. Policy Research Cooperation. De paardensector als economische en maatschappelijke actor in Vlaanderen. Een analyse van het economische en sociaal-maatschappelijke profiel en belang van de Vlaamse paardenhouderijen. Presentation Workshop, Brussels, 16th October 2008.
6. Törn, A., Tolvanen, A., Norokorpi, Y., Tervo, R. & Siikamäki, P., Comparing the impacts of hiking, skiing and horse riding on trail and vegetation in different types of forest. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2009), pp. 1427-1434, 2009.
7. Busck, A.G., Kristensen, S.P., Prøstholm, S. & Primdahl, J., Porous landscapes - the case of greater Copenhagen. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 7(3), pp. 145-156, 2008. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2007.05.002 (Pubitemid 351899340)
8. Vlaamse Landmaatschappij (VLM). 7 dialoogdagen over de paardenhouderij - Discussieteksten en verslagen. Een initiatief van Vlaams minister-president Kris Peeters. Vlaamse Landmaatschappij. VU Guido Clerx, 2009. Available online: www.vlm.be.
9. Van der Windt, N.P., Olde Loohuis, R.J.W. & Agricola, H.J., De paardenhouderij in beeld, een verkenning naar de landschappelijke verschijningsvorm van de paardenhouderij. Alterra-rapport 1444. Wageningen: Alterra, 2007.
10. Vejre, H., Models for safeguarding urban fringe open landscapes the balance between public and private. Case study of management models for urban green space around Copenhagen. Proc. of the Conference 'Rurality Near the City', eds. V. Dewaelheyns & H. Gulinck, KULeuven: Leuven, pp. 51-60, 2008. Available online: www.ruralitynearthecity.be
11. Daniels, T.L., Hobby farming in America: rural development or threat to commercial agriculture? Journal of Rural Studies, 2(1), pp. 31-40, 1986. doi:10.1016/0743-0167(86)90071-9 (Pubitemid 16290594)
12. Norusis, M.J., SPSS 15.0. Statistical Procedures Companion, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 2006.
13. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO), Statistical Development Series 1996: Conducting Agricultural Censuses and Surveys. Rome, 1996.
14. Gallego, F.J., Sampling Frames with Square Segments. Office for official publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 1995.
15. Tsiligirides, T.A., Remote sensing as a tool for agricultural statistics: a case study of area frame sampling methodology in Hellas. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 20(1998), pp. 45-77, 1998. (Pubitemid 28336066)
16. Cotter, J. & Nealon, J., Area Frame Design for Agricultural Surveys, National Agricultural Statistics Service, USDA: Washington, 1987.
17. Bunce, R.G.H., Metzger, M.J., Jongman, R.H.G., Brandt, J., De Blust, G., Elena-Rossello, R. et al., A standardized procedure for surveillance and monitoring European habitats and provision of spatial data. Landscape Ecology, 23(1), pp. 11-25, 2007. doi:10.1007/s10980-007-9173-8
18. Cooper, A. & en McCann, T., Habitat Change in the Northern Ireland Countryside: Summary Report of the Northern Ireland Countryside Survey, 2000. Environment Heritage Service, Department of the Environment for the Northern Ireland, Belfast, 2002.
19. Gallego, F.J., Crop area estimation in the MARS project. Conference on Ten Years of the MARS Project, Brussels. Agriculture and Regional Information Systems, Space Applications Institute, JRC, Italy, 1999.
20. Bunce, R.G.H., Howard, D.C.J., Hallam, C.J. & Benefield, C.B., Ecological Consequences of Land Use Change. Final Report to Department of Environment, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cumbria (UK), 1992.
21. Sepp, K., The Methodology and Applications of Agricultural Landscape Monitoring in Estonia. Vol. 9. Dissertationes Geographicae Universitatis Tartuensis, Tartu University Press, Tartu. 167 pp, 1999.
22. Rondeux, J.E., Bauffe, C., Boreux, D. & Dawant, J.M., Mise au point d'une méthodologie d'inventaire des habitats dans le cadre du suivi de la biodiversité en Région Wallone, Faculté Universitaire des sciences agronomiques de Gembloux, Unité de Gestion et Economie forestières, 1999.
23. O'Neill, R.V., Hunsaker, C.T., Timmins, S.P., Jackson, B.L., Jones, K.B., Riiters, K.H. & Wickham, J.D., Scale problems in reporting landscape pattern at the regional scale. Landscape Ecology, 11(3), pp. 169-180, 1996. doi:10.1007/BF02447515 (Pubitemid 126723325)
24. Malhotra, N.K. & Birks, D.F., Questionnaire design. Marketing Research: an Applied Orientation, Pearson Education Limited, pp. 324-331, 2003.
25. Roth, M., Validating the use of internet survey techniques in visual landscape assessment - an empirical study from Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78(3), pp. 179-192, 2006. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.07.005 (Pubitemid 44602274)
26. Reips, U.D., The Web-experiment Method: Advantages, Disadvantages and Solutions, Academic Press: San Diega, CA, pp. 89-114, 2000. doi:10.1026//1618- 3169.49.4.243
27. Reips, U.D., Standards for internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49(4), pp. 243-256, 2002.
28. Bächtiger, M., Frick, A. & Reips, U.D., Financial Incentives, Personal Information and Dropout in Online Studies, Pabst Science: Lengerich, Germany, pp. 209-219, 2001.
29. Van de Sype, P., Drijvende krachten van landgebruiksveranderingen in Sint-Katelijne-Waver. Eindwerk aan de Katholieke Universiteit van Leuven, Departement aard- en omgevingswetenschappen, afdeling bos, natuur en landschap, p. 105, 2008.
30. Dewaelheyns, V., Bomans, K. & Gulinck, H., Verspreiding, morfologie en ruimtelijke associaties van het tuincomplex in Vlaanderen. Ad Hoc Opdracht voor Steunpunt Ruimte en Wonen. In opdracht van Departement Ruimte, Wonen en Onroerend Erfgoed, Brussel, pp. 1-138, 2008.
31. Meeus, S. & Gulinck, H., Semi-urban areas in landscape research: a review. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 2(2008), p. 3, 2008. Available online: http://www.livingreviews.org/ lrlr-2008-3.
32. Krause, C.L., Our visual landscape - managing the landscape under special consideration of visual aspects. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1-4), pp. 239-254, 2001. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00139-6 (Pubitemid 32608273)
33. von Haaren, C., Landscape planning facing the challenge of the development of cultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 60(2), pp. 73-80, 2002. doi:10.1016/ S0169-2046(02)00060-9 (Pubitemid 34817022)