La comisión nacional de productividad industrial y la ≪americanización≫ de la industria del calzado en españa

Revista de Historia Economica - Journal of Iberian and Latin American Economic History

Volumn 22, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 637-668

  Encarnación, José Antonio Miranda ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALICANTE   (Spain)

Author keywords

014; Americanisation; footwear industry; Franco regime; N44; N64; N84; productivity

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054901610     PISSN: 02126109     EISSN: 20413335     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S021261090001168X     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Anglo-American Council on Productivy (1951): Productivity Team Report on the Footwear Industry. Londres: Anglo-American Council on Productivity.
2. Anuario Estadístico de España. Madrid (varios años).
3. Banco de Crédito Industrial (1962): Informe de carácter general sobre la industria del calzado en España, s.l.: Servicio de Estudios del Banco de Crédito Industrial.
4. BARCIELA, C. (2000): La ayuda americana a España (1953–1963). Alicante: Universidad de Alicante.
5. Barjot, D. (2002): “Introduction”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 13–50.
6. Boel, B. (1998): “The European Productivity Agency”, en M. Kipping y O. Bjarnar (eds.), The Americanisation of European Business. The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models. Londres: Routledge, pp. 37–54.
7. Bondi, F. y Mariacher, G (1979): La calzatura della Riviera del Brenta. Storia & Disegn. Venecia: Cavallino.
8. Brooker, K. B. (1986): “The transformation of the small master economy in the boot and shoe industry, 1887–1914: with special reference to Northampton”. University of Hull. Tesis doctoral.
9. Buesa, M. (1984): “Las restricciones a la libertad de industria en la politica industrial española (1938–1963)”. Información Comercial Española 606, pp. 107–121.
10. Bureau of Labor Statistics (1965): Indexes of Output Per Man-Hour Footwear Industry, 1947–63. Washington: U. S. Department of Labor.
11. Calvo, O. (2001): “Bienvenido, Mister Marshall! La ayuda económica americana y la economía española en la década de 1950”. Revista de Historia Econòmica XIX, pp. 253–276.
12. Carew, A. (1987): Labour under the Marshall Plan. The Politics of Productivity and the Marketing of Management Science. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
13. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1956): Memoria de las visitas realizadas a fábricas francesas de calzado por un grupo de fabricantes mallorquines, con indicación de las principales mejoras observadas para el aumento de su productividad. Madrid: CNPI.
14. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1957): La industria del calzado en Estados Unidos. Madrid: CNPI.
15. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1958): Normalización de medidas del calzado (Estudio piloto en Madrid). Madrid: CNPI.
16. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1959): Productividad de la industria española del calzado. Madrid: CNPI.
17. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1961): La CNPI y sus actividades en 1960. Madrid: CNPI.
18. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1961): Industria del curtido: Memoria presentada a la CNPI por el equipo de curtidos enviado a los Estados Unidos. Madrid: CNPI.
19. Comisión Nacional de Productividad Industrial (1964): Comparación inter-empresas, un estudio piloto en la industria europea del calzado. Madrid: CNPI.
20. Department of Commerce ( 1924): Shoes, Leather, and Hides in Great Britain. Washington: Government Printing Office.
21. Duke, J. y Usher, L. (1989): “Multifactor Productivity Slips in the Nonrubber Footwear Industry”. Monthly Labor Review (Abril), pp. 32–38.
22. Faler, P. G. (1981): Mechanics and Manufacturers in the Early Industrial Revolution. Lynn, Massachusetts, 1780–1860. Albany: State University of New York Press.
23. Farre-Escofet, E., Marimon, R. y Suris, J. M. (1977): La via menorquina del creixement. Barcelona: Banca Catalana-Servei d'Estudis.
24. Federation Nationale de L'Industrie de la Chaussure de France (1957): Les industries du cuir. L'industrie de la chaussure. Paris : Conseil National du Patronat Français et Institut National de la Statistique et des Etudes Economiques.
25. Feldenkirchen, W. (2002): “Productivity Missions and the German Electrical Industry”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence After the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 285–300.
26. Gabinete de Estudios de la Dirección General de Industrias Textiles y Varias (1966): La industria del calzado en España. Madrid: Servicio de Publicaciones del Ministerio de Industria.
27. Guillén, M. F. (1994): Models of Management. Work, Authority, and Organization in a Comparative Perspective. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
28. Hogan, M. (1987): The Marshall Plan: America, Great Britain and the Reconstruction of Western Europe, 1947–1952. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Hoover, E. M. (1937): Location Theory and the Shoe and Leather Industries. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
30. Industries du cuir, Les (1920).
31. Instituto Nacional de Investigaçao Industrial (1969): Estudos de produtividade, n° 9. Medidas directas de produtividade na industria de calçado mecánico. Lisboa: Secretaria de Estado da Industria-Ministério da Economia.
32. Kipping, M. (1997): “Consultancies, Institutions and the Diffusion of Taylorism in Britain, Germany and France, 1920s to 1950s”. Business History 39 (4), pp. 67–83.
33. Kipping, M. (2000): “A Slow and Difficult Process: the Americanization of the French Steel-Producing
34. J. Zeitlin y G Herrigel (eds.), Americanization and Its Limits. Reworking US Technology and Management in PostWar Europe and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 209–235.
35. Kipping, M. y Bjarnar, O. (eds.), (1998): The Americanisation of European Business. The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models. Londres: Routledge.
36. Kuisel, R. (1996): Seducing the French. The Dilemma of Americanization. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. Lanthier, P. (2002): “France and US Industrial Know-How: the Case of Electrical Engineering, 1945–60”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 301–314.
38. Leather Trade's Review, (1929).
39. Leroux-Calas, M. (2002): “The Influence of the Productivity Missions on R&D in France: The Case of AFC-Péchiney”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 395–404.
40. McGlade, J. (1998): “From Business Reform Programme to Production Drive. The Transformation of US Technical Assistance to Western Europe”, en M. Kipping y O. Bjarnar (eds.), The Americanisation of European Business. The Marshall Plan and the Transfer of US Management Models. Londres: Routledge, pp. 18–34.
41. McGlade, J. (1998): “The Big Push: the Export of American Business Education to Western Europe
42. L. Engwall y V. Zamagni (eds.), Management Education in Historical Perspective. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 50–65.
43. Mioche, P. (2002): “The Mistakes of Productivity Missions to the United States: The Case of the French Steel Industry”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence after the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 265–276.
44. Miranda, J. A. (2001): “En busca del tiempo perdido: la conquista del mercado exterior y el desarrollo de la industria del calzado en España en la segunda mitad del siglo XX”. Revista de Historia Industrial 19–20, pp. 39–77.
45. Moel, E. (2002): “The American Productivity Gospel in Norway: A Matter of Politics”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence After the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 99–112.
46. Nadal, J. (1994): “La transición del zapato manual al zapato mecánico en España”, en J. Nadal y J. Catalan (eds), La cara oculta de la industrialización española. La modernización de los sectores no lideres (siglos XIXy XX). Madrid: Alianza Editorial, pp. 321–339.
47. Piore, M. J. y Sabel, C. F. (1990): La segunda ruptura industrial. Madrid: Alianza.
48. Productividad. Revista de la CNPI. Madrid (varios años).
49. Puig, N. (2002): “Educating Spanish Managers. The United States, Modernizing Networks, and Business Schools in Spain, 1950–1975”, en R. P. Adam et al. (eds.), Inside the Business School: The Content of Management Education. Oslo: Abstrakt Press, pp. 71–102.
50. Revista española de las industrias de la piel. Madrid (varios años).
51. Revista de la piel. Madrid (varios años).
52. Sabel, C. F. y Zeitlyn, J. ( 1997): World of Possibilities. Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Schröter, H. G. (2002): “What Is Americanisation? Or About the Use and Abuse of the Americanisation-Concept”, en D. Barjot, I. Lescent-Giles y M. De Ferrière (eds.), L'Américanisation en Europe au XXesiècle: économie, culture, politique. Volume 1. Lille: Université Charles de Gaulle, pp. 41–57.
54. Scranton, P. (1998): Endless Novelty. Specialty Production and American Industrialization, 1865–1925. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
55. Segreto, L. (2002): “The Impact of the US Productivity Philosophy in Italy After the Second World War”, en D. Barjot (ed.), Catching Up with America. Poductivity Missions and the Diffusion of American Economic and Technological Influence After the Second World War. Paris: Presse de l'Université de Paris-Sorbonne, pp. 135–146.
56. Szenberg, M., Lombardi, J. W. y Lee, E. Y. (1977): Welfare Effects of Trade Restrictions. A Case Study of the U.S. Footwear Industry. Nueva York: Academic Press.
57. Thomson, R. (1989): The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
58. Tiratsoo, N. (2000): “The United States Technical Assistance Programme in Japan, 195562”. Business History 42 (4), pp. 117–136.
59. Tiratsoo, N. y Tomlinson (1993): Industrial Efficiency and State Intervention: Labour 193951. Londres: Routledge.
60. Tomlinson, J. (1990): “The Failure of the Anglo-American Council on Productivity”.
61. Business History 33 (1), pp. 82–92.
62. U. S. Bureau of Foreing and Domestic Commerce ( 1946): Boot and Shoe Industry Statistics.
63. Washington: Department of Commerce.
64. U. S. Department of Commerce (1929): Boot and Shoe Industry and Trade in Great Britain. Washington: Government Printing Office.
65. U. S. Department of Commerce (1929) : Boot and Shoe Industry and Trade in Germany. Washington: Government Printing Office.
66. U. S. Department of Commerce (1929) (1937): Leather Footwear. World Production and International Trade. Washington: Government Printing Office.
67. Viñas, A., Viñuela, J., Eguidazu, F., Pulgar, C. F. y Florensa, S. (1979): Política comercial exterior en España (1931–1975). Madrid: Servicio de Estudios del Banco Exterior de España.
68. Works Progress Administration ( 1939): Labor Productivity in the Boot and Shoe Industry. Philadelphia: Works Progress Administration, National Research Project in cooperation with Bureau of Labor Statistics, Department of Labor.
69. Zeitlin, J. (2000): “Introduction: Americanization and Its Limits: Reworking US Technology and Management in Post-War Europe and Japan”, en J. Zeitlin y G Herrigel (eds.), Americanization and Its Limits. Reworking US Technology and Management in PostWar Europe and Japan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–50.