A changing stroke rehabilitation environment: Implications for upper limb interventions

2011 5th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare and Workshops, PervasiveHealth 2011

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 374-378

  Jones, Lucy ^a   Van Wijck, Frederike ^b   Grealy, Madeleine ^a   Rowe, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^b GLASGOW CALEDONIAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

based; community stroke; motor relearning; rehabilitation; upper limb; visual feedback

Indexed keywords

BASED; COMMUNITY-BASED REHABILITATION; COMMUNITY-STROKE; EARLY SUPPORTED DISCHARGES; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; NOVEL SOLUTIONS; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER LIMBS; VISUAL FEEDBACK;

PATIENT TREATMENT; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING; VISUAL COMMUNICATION;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

EID: 80054893372     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.246126     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. C. D. A. Wolfe, "The impact of stroke," British Medical Bulletin, vol. 56, pp. 275-286, January 1, 2000.
2. T. Olsen, "Arm and leg paresis as outcome predictors in stroke rehabilitation," Stroke, vol. 21, pp. 247-251, February 1, 1990.
3. J. L. Patton, et al., "Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 168, pp. 368-383, 2006.
4. G. Kwakkel, et al., "Probability of Regaining Dexterity in the Flaccid Upper Limb: Impact of Severity of Paresis and Time Since Onset in Acute Stroke," Stroke, vol. 34, pp. 2181-2186, September 1, 2003.
5. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of patients with stroke: Rehabilitation, and discharge planning. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2010. (SIGN publication no.118).
6. J. Carr and R. Shephard, "Stroke Rehabilitation. Guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill," 2003.
7. L. Legg, et al., "Occupational therapy for patients with problems in personal activities of daily living after stroke: systematic review of randomised trials," Bmj, vol. 335, p. 922, November 3, 2007.
8. G. Kwakkel, et al., "Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories," Restor Neurol Neurosci, vol. 22, pp. 281 - 299, 2004.
9. B. French, et al., "Repetitive Task Training for Improving Functional Ability After Stroke," Stroke, vol. 40, pp. e98-99, April 1, 2009.
10. S. Hakkennes and J. Keating, "Constraint-induced movement therapy following stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials," Aust J Physiother, vol. 51, pp. 221 - 231, 2005.
11. T. Platz, et al., "Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: a single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial," Clinical Rehabilitation, vol. 19, pp. 714-724, July 1, 2005.
12. J. Mehrholz, et al., "Electromechanical and Robot-Assisted Arm Training for Improving Arm Function and Activities of Daily Living After Stroke," Stroke, vol. 40, pp. e392-393, May 1, 2009.
13. U. Talvitie, "Socio-affective characteristics and properties of extrinsic feedback in physiotherapy," Physiotherapy Research International, vol. 5, pp. 173-189, 2000.
14. C. Dohle, et al., "Mirror Therapy Promotes Recovery From Severe Hemiparesis: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, pp. 209-217, March/April 2009.
15. G. Yavuzer, et al., "Mirror Therapy Improves Hand Function in Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial," Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, vol. 89, pp. 393-398, 2008.
16. S. K. Subramanian, et al., "Does Provision of Extrinsic Feedback Result in Improved Motor Learning in the Upper Limb Poststroke? A Systematic Review of the Evidence," Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 24, pp. 113-124, February 1, 2010.
17. B. Molier, et al., "Nature, timing, frequency and type of augmented feedback; does it influence motor relearning of the hemiparetic arm after stroke? A systematic review," Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 32, pp. 1799-1809, 2010.
18. W. S. Harwin, et al., "Challenges and Opportunities for Robot-Mediated Neurorehabilitation," Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 94, pp. 1717-1726, 2006.
19. A. Macdonald, C. Docherty, and E. Miller, "Inclusive User Research: assessing the value of data visualisation," presented at Include 2009: Inclusive design into innovation: transforming practice in design, research and business. 5th International Conference on Inclusive Design, Royal College of Art, London, 2009.
20. T. M. P Goldie, G Kinsella "Movement rehabilitation following stroke," Research report, Department of Healthm Housing and Community Services, Victoria, Australia., 1992.
21. T. Outpatient Service. (2003, Therapy-based rehabilitation services for stroke patients at home. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (1). Available: http://www.mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD002925/ frame.html
22. J. H. Crosbie, et al., "Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: Still more virtual than real," Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 29, pp. 1139-1146, 2007.
23. A. Henderson, et al., "Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review of its Effectiveness for Upper Limb Motor Recovery," Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 14, pp. 52-61, 2007.
24. R. Wiles, et al., "Patients' expectations of recovery following stroke: a qualitative study," Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 24, pp. 841-850, 2002.