Zfp281 functions as a transcriptional repressor for pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem cells

Stem Cells

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2011, Pages 1705-1716

  Fidalgo, Miguel ^a   Shekar, P Chandra ^a   Ang, Yen Sin ^a   Fujiwara, Yuko ^b,c,d   Orkin, Stuart H ^b,c,d   Wang, Jianlong ^a  

^a MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c HARVARD STEM CELL INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Embryonic stem cells; Nanog; Pluripotency; Self renewal; Transcriptional repressor; Zfp281

Indexed keywords

KRUPPEL LIKE FACTOR; KRUPPEL LIKE ZINC FINGER PROTEIN 281; OCTAMER TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR 4; TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR NANOG; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC FINGER PROTEIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; BLASTOCYST; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL LINEAGE; CELL RENEWAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMBRYO; EMBRYO CULTURE; EMBRYOID BODY; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NULL ALLELE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PROMOTER REGION; PROTEIN DNA BINDING; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEIN FUNCTION; TRANSCRIPTION INITIATION; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; UPREGULATION;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN IMMUNOPRECIPITATION; EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; PROTEIN BINDING; TRANSCRIPTION FACTORS;

EID: 80054891760     PISSN: 10665099     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/stem.736     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981;292:154-156. (Pubitemid 11050741)
2. Boyer LA, Mathur D, Jaenisch R. Molecular control of pluripotency. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2006;16:455-462. (Pubitemid 44345206)
3. Surani MA, Hayashi K, Hajkova P. Genetic and epigenetic regulators of pluripotency. Cell 2007;128:747-762. (Pubitemid 46273582)
4. Loh YH, Wu Q, Chew JL et al. The Oct4 and Nanog transcription network regulates pluripotency in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Genet 2006;38:431-440.
5. Kim J, Chu J, Shen X et al. An extended transcriptional network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008;132:1049-1061. (Pubitemid 351381745)
6. Zhou Q, Chipperfield H, Melton DA et al. A gene regulatory network in mouse embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007;104:16438-16443. (Pubitemid 350211036)
7. Pardo M, Lang B, Yu L et al. An expanded Oct4 interaction network: Implications for stem cell biology, development, and disease. Cell Stem cell 2010;6:382-395.
8. van den Berg DL, Snoek T, Mullin NP et al. An Oct4-centered protein interaction network in embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem cell 2010;6:369-381.
9. Wang J, Rao S, Chu J et al. A protein interaction network for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells. Nature 2006;444:364-368. (Pubitemid 44764111)
10. Cheong CY, Lufkin T. Transcriptional repression in ES cells. J Cell Biochem 2010;110:288-293.
11. Liang J, Wan M, Zhang Y et al. Nanog and Oct4 associate with unique transcriptional repression complexes in embryonic stem cells. Nat Cell Biol 2008;10:731-739. (Pubitemid 351772939)
12. Wang J, Orkin SH. A protein roadmap to pluripotency and faithful reprogramming. Cells Tissues Organs 2008;188:23-30. (Pubitemid 351962226)
13. Wang ZX, Teh CH, Chan CM et al. The transcription factor Zfp281 controls embryonic stem cell pluripotency by direct activation and repression of target genes. Stem Cells 2008;26:2791-2799.
14. Lisowsky T, Polosa PL, Sagliano A et al. Identification of human GC-box-binding zinc finger protein, a new Kruppel-like zinc finger protein, by the yeast one-hybrid screening with a GC-rich target sequence. FEBS Lett 1999;453:369-374. (Pubitemid 29326681)
15. Law DJ, Du M, Law GL et al. ZBP-99 defines a conserved family of transcription factors and regulates ornithine decarboxylase gene expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 1999;262:113-120. (Pubitemid 29412633)
16. Zhang X, Diab IH, Zehner ZE. ZBP-89 represses vimentin gene transcription by interacting with the transcriptional activator, Sp1 Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:2900-2914. (Pubitemid 37442134)
17. Brandenberger R, Wei H, Zhang S et al. Transcriptome characterization elucidates signaling networks that control human ES cell growth and differentiation. Nat Biotechnol 2004;22:707-716. (Pubitemid 38702827)
18. Koch HB, Zhang R, Verdoodt B et al. Large-scale identification of c-MYC-associated proteins using a combined TAP/MudPIT approach. Cell Cycle 2007;6:205-217. (Pubitemid 46232502)
19. Cartwright P, McLean C, Sheppard A et al. LIF/STAT3 controls ES cell self-renewal and pluripotency by a Myc-dependent mechanism. Development 2005;132:885-896. (Pubitemid 40484924)
20. Knoepfler PS. Why myc? An unexpected ingredient in the stem cell cocktail. Cell Stem cell 2008;2:18-21.
21. Yi R, Poy MN, Stoffel M et al. A skin microRNA promotes differentiation by repressing 'stemness'. Nature 2008;452:225-229. (Pubitemid 351380241)
22. Scharer CD, McCabe CD, Ali-Seyed M et al. Genome-wide promoter analysis of the SOX4 transcriptional network in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res 2009;69:709-717.
23. Wei CL, Miura T, Robson P et al. Transcriptome profiling of human and murine ESCs identifies divergent paths required to maintain the stem cell state. Stem Cells 2005;23:166-185. (Pubitemid 40239513)
24. Chen X, Xu H, Yuan P et al. Integration of external signaling pathways with the core transcriptional network in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008;133:1106-1117. (Pubitemid 351787745)
25. Nagy A, Gertsenstein M, Vintersten K, et al. Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2003.
26. Wang J, Levasseur DN, Orkin SH. Requirement of Nanog dimerization for stem cell self-renewal and pluripotency. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:6326-6331. (Pubitemid 351758345)
27. Lee TI, Johnstone SE, Young RA. Chromatin immunoprecipitation and microarray-based analysis of protein location. Nat Protoc 2006;1:729-748.
28. Chambers I, Silva J, Colby D et al. Nanog safeguards pluripotency and mediates germline development. Nature 2007;450:1230-1234.
29. Marson A, Levine SS, Cole MF et al. Connecting microRNA genes to the core transcriptional regulatory circuitry of embryonic stem cells. Cell 2008;134:521-533.
30. Ang YS, Tsai S-Y, Lee D-F et al. Wdr5 mediates self-renewal and reprogramming via the embryonic stem cell core transcriptional network. Cell 2011;145:1-15.
31. Kim J, Cantor AB, Orkin SH et al. Use of in vivo biotinylation to study protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat Protoc 2009;4:506-517.
32. Singh AM, Hamazaki T, Hankowski KE et al. A heterogeneous expression pattern for Nanog in embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2007;25:2534-2542. (Pubitemid 47582745)
33. Fazzio TG, Huff JT, Panning B. An RNAi screen of chromatin proteins identifies Tip60-p400 as a regulator of embryonic stem cell identity. Cell 2008;134:162-174. (Pubitemid 351905738)
34. Ivanova N, Dobrin R, Lu R et al. Dissecting self-renewal in stem cells with RNA interference. Nature 2006;442:533-538. (Pubitemid 44167907)
35. Zaehres H, Lensch MW, Daheron L et al. High-efficiency RNA interference in human embryonic stem cells. Stem Cells 2005;23:299-305. (Pubitemid 40404448)
36. Ng HH, Surani MA. The transcriptional and signalling networks of pluripotency. Nat Cell Biol 2011;13:490-496.
37. Mitsui K, Tokuzawa Y, Itoh H et al. The homeoprotein Nanog is required for maintenance of pluripotency in mouse epiblast and ES cells. Cell 2003;113:631-642. (Pubitemid 36694188)
38. Wu Q, Chen X, Zhang J et al. Sall4 interacts with Nanog and cooccupies Nanog genomic sites in embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 2006;281:24090-24094. (Pubitemid 44274183)