Towards sustainable settlement growth: A new multi-criteria assessment for implementing environmental targets into strategic urban planning

Environmental Impact Assessment Review

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 195-210

  Schetke, Sophie ^a   Haase, Dagmar ^b,c   Kötter, Theo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^c HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Decision support system; Ecological targets; Land consumption; Multi criteria assessment; Urban land use

Indexed keywords

ADDED VALUES; CURRENT RATE; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; ECOLOGICAL TARGETS; ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS; ENVIRONMENTAL TARGETS; GREENFIELD; HOUSING DEVELOPMENT; INFILL DEVELOPMENT; LAND CONSUMPTION; LAND-USE PLAN; MULTI-CRITERIA ASSESSMENT; RESOURCE EFFICIENCIES; STRATEGIC URBAN PLANNING; SUSTAINABLE SETTLEMENTS; TEST RUNS; URBAN LAND USE;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; HOUSING; LAND USE; RATING; URBAN PLANNING;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HUMAN SETTLEMENT; INFILL; INNER CITY AREA; LAND USE PLANNING; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; STRATEGIC APPROACH; STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABILITY; URBAN PLANNING;

GERMANY;

EID: 80054890297     PISSN: 01959255     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (93)

1. Alberti M. The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. Int Reg Sci Rev 2005, 28:168-192.
2. Alberti M. Advances in urban ecology. Integrating humans and ecological processes in urban ecosystems 2009, Springer, Berlin.
3. Banzhaf E., Höfer R. Monitoring urban structure types as spatial indicators with CIR aerial photographs for a more effective urban environmental management. IEEE J of Sel Top in Appl Earth Obs and Remote Sens 2008, 1:129-138.
4. Batey P.W.J., Breheny M.J. Methods in strategic planning: a descriptive review. Town Plan Rev 1978, 49:259-273.
5. Besio M., Quadrelli N. Geo-information technologies in support of environmental and landscape planning. Planning support systems - best practise and new methods 2009, 265-292. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, Stillwell (Eds.).
6. Blanco H., Alberti M., Olshansky R., Chang S., Wheeler S.M., Randolph J., et al. Shaken, shrinking, hot, impoverished and informal: emerging research agendas in planning. Prog in Plan 2009, 72:195-250.
7. Brückner C. Indikatoren einer nachhaltigen Raumentwicklung in Nordhrein-Westfalen. ILS-Schriften 2001, 175:11-93.
8. Nachhaltige Entwicklung in der Schweiz. Materialien für ein Indikatorensystem 1999, Eine Pilotstudie unter Verwendung der Methodik der Komission für nachhaltige Entwicklung der UNO (CSD), Neuchatel. Bundesamt für Statistik (BfS), Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL) (Eds.).
9. Bundesanstalt für Geowissenschaften und Rohstoffe, BGR Bodenkundliche Kartieranleitung 1994, Schweitzerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, Hannover. Dt. Bodenkl. Ges (Ed.).
10. Carsjens G.J., Ligtenberg A. A GIS-based support tool for sustainable spatial planning in metropolitan areas. Landsc Urban Plan 2007, 80:72-83.
11. City of Essen. Klimaanalyse Stadt Essen, Kommunalverband Ruhrgebiet und Roßmann & Koch GbR, Stadt Essen Umweltamt, editor. Essen ; 2002.
12. Coenen R. Konzeptionelle Aspekte der Entwicklung von Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren. Final Report of HGF-Project "Untersuchung zu einem integrativen Konzept nachhaltiger Entwicklung: Bestandsaufnahme, Problemanalyse, Weiterentwicklung". Section 4. Karlsruhe 1999.
13. Costanza R., d' Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., et al. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:53-260.
14. Courtney J.F. Decision-making and knowledge management in inquiring organisations: toward a new decision-making paradigm for DSS. Decis Support Syst 2003, 31:17-38.
15. Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington. 3rd ed. G.C. Daily (Ed.).
16. De Groot R.S., Wilson M., Boumans R. A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 2002, 41:393-408.
17. Deng J.S., Wang K., Hong Y., Qi J.G. Spatio-temporal dynamics and evolution of land use change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urbanisation. Landsc Urban Plan 2009, 92:187-198.
18. Diez E., McIntosh B.S. A review of the factors which influence the use and usefulness of Information Systems. Env Mod Softw 2009, 24:588-602.
19. Döring T., Heiland S., Tischer M. Kommunale Nachhaltigkeitsindikatorensysteme in Deutschland - Zum aktuellen Stand von Entwicklung und Anwendung. Vierteljahreshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung 2004, 73:96-111.
20. EEA (European Environmental Agency) Urban sprawl in Europe - the ignored challenge. EEA Report 10/2006. Copenhagen 2006.
21. Federal Environmental Agency [Umweltbundesamt] Ressourcennutzung und Abfallwirtschaft Retrieved 26 7, 2011 from. http://www.umweltbundesamt-umwelt-deutschland.de/umweltdaten/public/theme.do?nodeIdent=2898.
22. Federal Institute for Research on Building, Urban Affairs and Spatial Spatial [BBR] Indikatorengestützte Erfolgskontrolle in der Stadtentwicklung - praktische Erfahrungen in Modellstädten. working paper 2/2001. Bonn; 2001 2001, M. Fuhrich (Ed.).
23. Flacke J. Mehr Stadt - Weniger Fläche. Forschungen zur Deutschen Landeskunde; 251 2003, Selbstverlag der Deutschen Akademie für Landeskunde, Flensburg.
24. Gainsborough J.F. The politics of sprawl: variation in public support for slowing growth. Inf zur Raumentwickl 2002, 9:493-499.
25. Planning support systems. The GeoJournal Library 95 2009, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
26. Gehrlein U. Gestaltungskriterien für kommunale Nachhaltigkeitsindikatoren-systeme. UVP-Rep 2003, 17:207-211.
27. Geneletti D. Incorporating biodiversity assets in spatial planning: methodological proposal and development of a planning support system. Landsc and Urban Plan 2008, 84:252-265.
28. Geneletti D., van Duren I. Protected area zoning for conservation and use: a combination of spatial multicriteria and multiobjective evaluation. Landsc Urban Plan 2008, 85:97-110.
29. Geneletti D., Bagli S., Napolitano P., Pistocchi A. Spatial decision support for strategic environmental assessment of land use plans. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2007, 27:408-423.
30. German Federal Building Code of 2004 (BGBl. I S. 2414).
31. Gill S.E., Handley J.F., Ennos A.R., Pauleit S., Theuray N., Lindley S.J. Characterising the urban environment of UK cities and towns: a template for landscape planning. Lands Urban Plan 2008, 87:210-222.
32. Giupponi C. Decision support systems for implementing the European water framework directive: the MULINO approach. Environ Model Softw 2007, 22:248-258.
33. Haase D. Effects of urbanisation on the water balance - a long-term trajectory. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2009, 29:211-219.
34. Haase D., Nuissl H. Does urban sprawl drive changes in the water balance and policy? The case of Leipzig (Germany) 1870-2003. Landsc Urban Plan 2007, 80:1-13.
35. Hahn B.M., Kofalk S., de Kok J.L., Berlekamp J., Evers M. Elbe DSS: a planning support system for strategic river basin planning. Hahn BM, Kofalk S, de Kok JL, Berlekamp J, Evers, M. 2009, 113-136. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
36. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. Sustainability impact assessments: limits, thresholds and the sustain-ability choice space. Sustainability impact assessment of land use changes 2008, 425-450. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. K. Helming, M. Pérez-Soba, P. Tabbush (Eds.).
37. Heiland S., Tischer M., Döring T., Pahl T., Jessel B. Indikatoren zur Zielkonkretisierung und Erfolgskontrolle im Rahmen der Lokalen Agenda 21. UBA-Texte 67/03 Berlin 2003.
38. Hemmati M. Multi-stakeholder processes for governance and sustainability 2002, Earthscan, London.
39. Hoeven v.d.N., Aerts J., Klis v.d.H., Koomen E. An integrated discussion support system for new Dutch flood risk management strategies. Planning support systems - best practise and new methods 2009, 159-174. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
40. Jakeman A.J., Letcher R.A., Norton J.P. Ten iterative steps in development and evaluation of environmental models. Environ Model Softw 2006, 21:602-614.
41. Compact cities. Sustainable urban forms for developing countries 2000, Spon Press, London. M. Jenks, R. Burgess (Eds.).
42. The compact city. A sustainable urban form? 1996, E & FN Spon, London. 1. ed. M. Jenks, E. Burton, K. Williams (Eds.).
43. Johnson M.P. Environmental impacts of urban sprawl: a survey of the literature and proposed research agenda. Environ Plan A 2001, 33:717-735.
44. Klosterman R.E., Pettit C.J. An update on planning support systems. Environ Plan B: Planning and Design 2005, 32:477-484.
45. Korczak D. Nachhaltigkeitsindikatorensysteme im Vergleich Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://www.gp-f.com/de/pdf/ak_nachh.pdf.
46. Kötter T., Frielinghaus B., Schetke S., Weigt D. Intelligente Flächennutzung - Erfassung und Bewertung von Wohnbaulandpotentialen in der Flächennutzungsplanung. Flächenmanagement und Bodenordnung 2009, 1:39-45.
47. Kötter T., Weigt D., Frielinghaus B., Schetke S. Nachhaltige Siedlungs- und Flächenentwicklung. Inhaltliche und methodische Aspekte der Erfassung und Bewertung. Land Development Strategies: Patterns, Risks, and Responsibilities 2009, 61-83. vdf Hochschulverlag, Zurich. E. Hepperle, H. Lenk (Eds.).
48. Kötter T., Frielinghaus B., Schetke S., Weigt D. FIN.30 - Flächen intelligent nutzen. Final Report 2010, Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://edok01.tib.uni-hannover.de/edoks/e01fb10/624986748.pdf.
49. Krampulz S. Quartalsberichte zur Landesentwicklung: Flächeninanspruchnahme. In cooperation with Piduch M. Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung und Bauwesen des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen (ILS NRW) 2005, Dortmund (Ed.).
50. Li F., Liu X., Hu D., Wang R., Yang W., Li D., et al. Measurement indicators and an evaluation approach for assessing urban sustainable development: a case study for China's Jining City. Landsc Urban Plan 2009, 90:134-142.
51. Malczewski J. GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis: a survey of the literature. Int Jof Geogr InfSci 2006, 20:703-726.
52. Marzluff J.M., Alberti M., Bradley G., Endlicher W., Ryan C., Shulenberger E., et al. Urban Ecology. An International Perspective on the Interaction Between Humans and Nature 2008, (Springer/11646/Dig. Serial]).
53. Massam B.H. Multi-criteria decision making techniques in planning. Prog Plan 1988, 30:1-84.
54. McIntosh B.S., Giupponi C., Voinov A.A., Smith C., Matthews K.B., Monticino M., et al. Bridging the gap: developing tools for environmental policy and management. State of the art and futures in environmental modelling and software 2006, Elsevier B.V. T. Jakeman, A.E. Rizzoli, A.A. Voinov, S.H. Chen (Eds.).
55. Mendoza G.A., Martins H. Multi-criteria decision analysis in natural resource management: a critical review of methods and new modelling paradigms. For Ecol Manag 2006, 230:1-22.
56. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
57. Miller D., Vogt N., Nijnik M., Brondizio E., Fiorini S. Integrating analytical and participatory techniques for planning the sustainable use of land resources and landscapes. Planning support systems - best practise and new methods 2009, 317-345. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
58. Nijkamp P., Ouwersloot H. A decision support system for regional sustainable development: the flag model In: Tinbergen Discussion Papers Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpapers/97074.pdf.
59. North Rhine-Westphalia Local Authorities Confederation (StGB NRW): Finanzsituation der Kommunen verschärft sich StGB NRW-press release 27/2009 Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://www.kommunen-in-nrw.de/presse/pressemitteilungen/detail/dokument/finanzsituation-der-kommunen-verschaerft-sich.html.
60. Nuissl H., Haase D., Lanzendorf M., Wittmer H. Environmental impact assessment of urban land use transitions-A context-sensitive approach. Land Use Policy 2009, 26:414-424.
61. Parker P., Letcher R., Jakeman A., Beck M.B., Harris G., Argent R.M., et al. Progress in integrated assessment and modelling. Environ Model Softw 2002, 17:209-217.
62. Pastille Consortium Indikatoren in Aktion. Ein Praxisleitfaden zur besseren Anwendung von Nachhaltigkeits-Indikatoren auf lokaler Ebene 2002, London. Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://www.oekoweb.at/neu/infoebenen/broschueren/pdf/pastille-deutsch.pdf.
63. Pauleit S., Ennos A.R., Golding Y. Modelling the environmental impacts of urban land use and land cover change - a study in Merseyside, UK. Landsc Urban Plan 2005, 71:295-310.
64. Pelizaro C., Arentze T., Timmermans H. GRAS: a spatial planning support system for green space planning. Planning Support Systems - Best Practise and New Methods 2009, 191-208. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
65. Poch M., Comas J., Rodríguez-Roda I., Sánchez-Marré M., Cortés U. Designing and building real environmental decision support systems. Env Mod Softw 2004, 19:857-873.
66. Ravetz J. Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 2000, 20:31-63.
67. Reeve D., Petch J. GIS, organisations and people, a socio-technical approach 1999, Taylor and Francis Ltd, London.
68. Rieniets T. Shrinking cities: causes and effects of urban population losses in the twentieth century. Nature and Culture 2009, 4:231-254.
69. Schauerte M. InWIS- Gutachten. Wohnungsnachfrageanalyse 2015+ Stadt Essen im Rahmen des Stadtentwicklungsprozesses - Perspektive 2015+. In behalf of the City of Essen. In cooperation with Blum B, Hobel R. Bochum 2007.
70. Schetke S. Socio-environmental impacts of settlement growth under conditions of fostered infill development: a methodological framework for a multicriteria assessment [dissertation]. Bonn: University of Bonn; 2010.
71. Schetke S., Kötter T., Frielinghaus B., Weigt D. Assessment of sustainable land use in Germany - the project FIN.30. Urbanistica 2009, 138:103-105. 117.
72. Schetke S., Haase D., Breuste J. Green space functionality under conditions of uneven urban land use development. J of Land Use Sci 2010, 5:143-158.
73. Schetke S., Kötter T., Haase D. Towards sustainable urban land use- a methodological design for implementing socio-ecological targets into the strategic planning of cities in Germany. Proceedings of the XXIV FIG International Congress 2010, 2010 April 11-16; Sydney, Australia. Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://www.fig.net/pub/fig2010.
74. Schultz B., Dosch F. Trends der Siedlungsflächenentwicklung und ihre Steuerung in der Schweiz und Deutschland. DISP 2005, 160:5-15.
75. Siedentop S. Innenentwicklung als Leitbild einer nachhaltigen Siedlungsentwicklung. Flächen intelligent nutzen - Strategien für eine nachhaltige Siedlungsentwicklung. Documentation of the NABU-Conference. Erfurt, Germany: ABU-Naturschutzbund Deutschland e.V. 2001 Nov 8-9, 37-48.
76. Siedentop S. Urban sprawl - verstehen, messen, steuern. DISP 2005, 160:23-35.
77. Siedentop S., Fina S. Urban sprawl beyond growth: from a growth to a decline. Perspective on the cost of sprawl. Proceedings of the 44th ISCOCARP Congress 2008 Sep 19-23, Dalian, China.
78. Singer C. Stadtökologisch wertvolle Freiflächen in Nordrhein-Westfalen. Institut für Landes- und Stadtentwicklungsforschung. ILS-Schriften 96. Dortmund 1995.
79. Sudhira H.S., Ramachandra T.V. A spatial planning support system for managing Bangalore's urban sprawl. Planning support systems - best practise and new methods 2009, 175-190. Springer Science+Business Media B.V. S. Geertman, J. Stillwell (Eds.).
80. Sustainability G.C. Mehr Wert für die Fläche: Das "Ziel-30-ha" für die Nachhaltigkeit in Stadt und Land; Empfehlungen an die Bundesregierung Retrieved 8 24, 2011 from. http://www.nachhaltigkeitsrat.de/uploads/media/Broschuere_Flaechenempfehlung_02.pdf.
81. Termorshuizen J.W., Opdam P. Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development. Landsc Ecol 2009, 24:1037-1052.
82. Thomas M.R. A GIS-based decision support system for brownfield redevelopment. Landsc and Urban Plan 2002, 58:7-23.
83. Torrens P.M., Alberti M. Measuring sprawl. CASA paper 27, UCL London 2000.
84. Van Daalen E., Dresen L., Janssen M.A. The roles of computer models in the environmental policy life-cycle. Environ Sci Policy 2002, 5:221-231.
85. Vennix J.A.M. Group model-building: tackling messy problems. Syst Dyn Rev 1999, 15:379-401.
86. Vonk G., Geertman S., Schot P. Bottlenecks blocking widespread usage of planning support systems. Environ Plan A 2005, 37:909-924.
87. Vrščaj B., Poggio L., Marsan F.A. A method for soil environmental quality evaluation for management and planning in urban areas. Landsc Urban Plan 2008, 88:81-94.
88. Walker D.H. Decision support, learning and rural resource management. Agric Syst 2002, 73:113-127.
89. Wende W., Marschall I., Heiland S., Lipp T., Reinke M., Schaal P., et al. Umsetzung von Maßnahmenvorschlägen örtlicher Landschaftspläne. Naturschutz und Landschaftsplanung 2009, 41:145-149.
90. Wolter O. Monitoring und Controlling nachhaltiger Raumentwicklung mittels Indikatoren [diploma thesis]. Zurich: ETH Zurich; 2001.
91. Wong C. Old wine in a new bottle? Planning methods and techniques in the 1990s. Plan Pract Res. 1998, 13:221-236.
92. Wrbka T. Landschaftsökologische Strukturmerkmale als Indikatoren der Nachhaltigkeit. Final Report of Research Project "Sinus" 2003, Retrieved 7 26, 2011 from. http://131.130.59.133/projekte/sinus/pdf/titel.pdf.
93. Zebisch M., Wechsung F., Kenneweg H. Landscape response functions for biodiversity-assessing the impact of land-use changes at the county level. Landsc Urban Plan 2004, 67:157-172.