What’s cognitive about cognitive linguistics?

Cognitive Linguistics in the Redwoods: The Expansion of a New Paradigm in Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 27-53

  Gibbs, Raymond W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064826474     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110811421.27     Document Type: Chapter

References (45)

1. Altmann, Gerry & Mark Steedman 1988 “Interaction with context during human sentence processing”, Cognition 30: 191-238.
2. Burgess, Curt, Michael Tannenhaus & Mark Seidenberg 1989 “Context and lexical access: Implications of nonword interference for lexical ambiguity resolution”, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory & Cognition 15: 620-632.
3. Casad, Eugene H. 1988 “Conventionalization of Cora locationals”, in: Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (ed.), Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
4. Chomsky, Noam 1980 Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.
5. Clark, Herbert & Barbara Malt 1984 “Psychological constraints on language: A commentary on Bresnan, Kaplan, and on Givon”, in: Walter Kintsch, James Miller & Peter Paulson (eds.), Methods and tactics in cognitive science.Hillsdale, N.J. : L. Erlbaum
6. Ferreira, Fernanda & Charles Clifton 1986. “The independence of syntactic processing”, Journal of Memory and Language 25: 348-368.
7. Fodor, Jerry 1983 Modularity of mind. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
8. Frazier, Lynn 1979 “On comprehending sentences: Syntactic parsing strategies.” Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
9. Gardner, Howard 1983 Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.
10. Garfield, Jay (ed.) 1987 Modularity in knowledge representation and natural language processing. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
11. Geiger, Richard A. & Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn (eds.) 1993 Conceptualizations and mental processing in language. Cognitive Linguistic Research 3. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
12. Gibbs, Raymond 1984 “Literal meaning and psychological theory”, Cognitive Science 8: 275-304.
13. Gibbs, Raymond 1989 “Understanding and literal meaning”, Cognitive Science 13: 243-251.
14. Gibbs, Raymond 1990 “Psycholinguistic studies on the conceptual basis of idiomaticity”, Cognitive Linguistics 1: 417-451.
15. Gibbs, Raymond 1992 “What do idioms really mean?", Journal of Memory and Language 31: 485-506
16. Gibbs, Raymond & Jennifer O’Brien 1990 “Idioms and mental imagery: The metaphorical motivation for idiomatic meaning”, Cognition 36: 35-68.
17. Glucksberg, Sam, Roger Kreuz & Susan Rho 1986 “Context can constrain lexical access: Implications for models of language comprehension”, Journal of Experimental Psychology.Learning, Memory & Cognition 12: 323-335.
18. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi & Frederike Hünnemeyer 1991 Grammaticalization: A conceptual framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Hopper, Paul 1991 “Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language”, Language & Communication 11: 3-28.
20. Johnson, Mark 1987 The body in the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Johnson, Mark 1991 “Knowing through the body”, Philosophical Psychology 4: 3-20.
22. King, Jonathan & Marcel Just 1991 “Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory”, Journal of Memory and Language 30: 580-602.
23. Kintsch, Walter & Ernest Mross 1985 “Context effects in word identification”, Journal of Memory and Language 24: 336-349.
24. Kövecses, Zoltan 1986 Metaphors of anger, pride, and love. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Lakoff, George 1987 Women, fire, and dangerous things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
26. Lakoff, George 1990 “The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on imageschemas?", Cognitive Linguistics 1: 39-74.
27. Lakoff, George 1991 “Cognitive versus generative linguistics: how commitments influence results”, Language & Communication 11: 53-62.
28. Langacker, Ronald 1987 Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical prerequisites.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
29. Langacker, Ronald 1990 Foundations of cognitive grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive application.Stanford: Stanford University Press.
30. Lee, Mark 1988 “Language, perception, and the world.”, in: John Hawkins (ed.), Explaining language universals. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 23-46.
31. Nayak, Nandini & Raymond Gibbs 1990 “Conceptual knowledge in the interpretation of idioms”, Journal of Experimental Psychology : General 119: 315-330.
32. Newmeyer, Frederick 1991 “Functional explanation in linguistics and the origins of language”, Language & Communication 11: 3-28.
33. Onifer, William & David Swinney 1981 “Accessing lexical ambiguities during sentence comprehension: Effects of frequency of meaning and contextual bias”, Memory & Cognition 9: 225-236.
34. Potter, Mary, Judith Kroll, Barbara Yachzel, Elizabeth Carpenter & John Sherman 1986 “Pictures in sentences: Understanding without words”, Journal of Experimental Psychology. General 115: 281-294.
35. Rayner, Keith, Mary Carlson & Lynn Frazier 1983 “The interaction of syntax and semantics during sentence processing: Eye movements in the analysis of semantically biased sentences”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 22: 358-373.
36. Rudzka-Ostyn, Brygida (ed.) 1988 Topics in cognitive linguistics. Amersterdam: John Benjamins.
37. Ruwet, Nicholas 1991 Syntax and human experience. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Simpson, Greg 1981 “Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20: 120-136.
39. Swinney, David 1979 “Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects”, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18: 645-659.
40. Tabossi, Patrizia 1988 “Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential context”, Journal of Memory and Language 27: 324-340.
41. Tabossi, Patrizia, Lucia Colombo & Remo Job 1987 “Accessing lexical ambiguity: Effects of context and dominance”, Psychological Research 49: 161-167.
42. Taraban, Roman & James McClelland 1988 “Constituent attachment and thematic role assignment in sentence processing: Influence of content-based expectations”, Journal of Memory and Language 27: 597-632.
43. Tsohatzidis, Savas L. (ed.) 1989 Meanings and prototypes: Studies in linguistic categorization.London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
44. Van Petten, Cynthia & Marta Kutas 1987 “Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation”, Journal of Memory and Language 26: 188-208.
45. Wierzbicka, Anna 1985 Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Ann Arbor: Karoma.