Community preferences for the allocation & donation of organs - The PAraDOx study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 11, Issue , 2011, Pages

  Howard, Kirsten ^a   Jan, Stephen ^b   Rose, John ^c   Chadban, Steven ^d,e   Allen, Richard D M ^d,e   Irving, Michelle ^a,f   Tong, Allison ^a,f   Wong, Germaine ^a,f   Craig, Jonathan C ^a,f   Cass, Alan ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b GEORGE INSTITUTE FOR GLOBAL HEALTH   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d ROYAL PRINCE ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^f CHILDREN S HOSPITAL AT WESTMEAD   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONSUMER; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; POLICY; TRANSPLANTATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PUBLIC POLICY; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80054860924     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-386     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. ANZDATA Registry Report 2006. S McDonald S Chang L Excell, Adelaide, South Australia: Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry 2006
2. Statistics. Transplant Australia, 2008 http://www.transplant.org.au/ Statistic-s.html Internet (accessed May 2011)
3. The shortage of kidneys for transplantation in Australia. T Mathew R Faull P Snelling, Medical Journal of Australia 2005 182 5 204 5 15748126 (Pubitemid 40352780)
4. Newsletter: Transplant 2006. International figures on organ donation and transplantation - 2005. Council of Europe, Spain: Council of Europe 2006
5. The economic impact of end-stage kidney disease in Australia: Part I of the 'Study of the Economic Burden of Kidney and Urinary Tract Disease in Australia'. A Cass SJ Chadban JC Craig, et al. Kidney Health Australia 2006
6. Mid-Term Report for the Minister for Health and Ageing. National Clinical Taskforce on Organ and Tissue Donation, Canberra, ACT: Department of Health and Ageing 2007
7. Presumed consent for organ donation is an ethical and effective way of dealing with organ donation shortages. D Hamm J Tizzard, BMJ 2008 336 230 10.1136/bmj.39475.498090.80 18244961
8. The impact of presumed consent legislation on cadaveric organ donation: A cross-country study. A Abadie S Gay, Journal of Health Economics 2006 25 4 599 620 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.01.003 16490267 (Pubitemid 43994191)
9. Financial assistance for live organ donors. NZ Ministry of Social Development, 2008 http://www.workandincome.govt.nz/documents/financial- assistance-for-live-organ-donors.pdf (accessed May 2011). Internet
10. Living Organ Donor Expense Reimbursement Program Program FAQs. The Kidney Foundation of Canada, 2006 http://www.transplant.bc.ca/FAQs.pdf (accessed May 2011). Internet
11. Payment for donor kidneys: pros and cons. EA Friedman AL Friedman, Kidney International 2006 69 6 960 2 10.1038/sj.ki.5000262 16482095 (Pubitemid 43372168)
12. Proposal: two part payment scheme for live kidney donors. S Jan M Thompson, BMJ 2006 333 7561 262 16873878 (Pubitemid 44406733)
13. Public Survey of Financial Incentives for Kidney Donation. L Kranenburg A Schram W Zuidema, et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2007
14. Kidneys on demand. A Griffin, BMJ 2007 334 7592 502 5 10.1136/bmj.39141.493148.94 17347232 (Pubitemid 46588142)
15. Public attitudes toward incentives for organ donation: a national study of different racial/ethnic and income groups. LE Boulware MU Troll NY Wang NR Powe, American Journal of Transplantation 2006 6 11 2774 85 10.1111/j.1600-6143. 2006.01532.x 16952292 (Pubitemid 44571700)
16. Transplant waiting list. S Chadban S McDonald B Livingston L Excell, Adelaide, South Australia.: Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, McDonald S, Excell L, 2006 103 24 ANZDATA Registry Report 2006 (To Dec 31 2005)
17. Citizens at the Centre. Deliberative Participation in Healthcare Decisions. C Davies E Barnett MS Wetherall, London: The Policy Press 2006
18. Community consultation and engagement in health care reform. T McBride V Korczak, Australian Health Review 2007 31 Suppl 1 13 S15 17402899
19. Giving citizens a voice in healthcare policy in Canada. J Maxwell S Rosell P-G Forest, BMJ 2003 326 1031 3 10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1031 12742930 (Pubitemid 36566868)
20. Whose health service is it anyway? Community values in healthcare. GH Mooney S Blackwell, Med J Aust 2004 180 2 76 8 14723590 (Pubitemid 38173142)
21. Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide. E Lancsar J Louviere, Pharmacoeconomics 2008 26 8 661 77 10.2165/00019053-200826080-00004 18620460 (Pubitemid 351989058)
22. Things are looking up since we started listening to patients: Recent trends in the application of conjoint analysis in health 1970-2007. JF Bridges E Kinter L Kidane, et al. The Patient - Patient Centred Outcomes Research 2008 1 4 273 82 10.2165/1312067-200801040-00009
23. Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - How are studies being designed and reported? An update on current practice in the published literature between 2005 and 2008. DA Marshall JF Bridges AB Hauber, et al. The Patient - Patient Centred Outcomes Research 2010 3 4 249 56 10.2165/11539650-000000000-00000
24. Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health - a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value in Health. JF Bridges AB Hauber DA Marshall, et al. 2011 14 4 5
25. Determining priority for liver transplantation: a comparison of cost per QALY and discrete choice experiment-generated public preferences. J Ratcliffe M Buxton T Young L Longworth, Applied Health Economics & Health Policy 2005 4 4 249 55 10.2165/00148365-200504040-00007 21617636 (Pubitemid 43242213)
26. Public preferences for the allocation of donor liver grafts for transplantation. J Ratcliffe, Health Economics 2000 9 2 137 48 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(200003)9:2<137::AID-HEC489>3.0.CO;2-1 10721015 (Pubitemid 30148160)
27. Priorities in identifying unmet need in older people attending general practice: a nominal group technique study. V Drennan K Walters P Lenihan, et al. Family Practice 2007 24 5 454 60 10.1093/fampra/cmm034 17675658 (Pubitemid 350142642)
28. The research priorities of patients attending UK cancer treatment centres: findings from a modified nominal group study. J Corner D Wright J Hopkinson, et al. British Journal of Cancer 2007 96 6 875 81 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603662 17342090 (Pubitemid 46452292)
29. Patient perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: the rheumatoid arthritis patient priorities for pharmacologic interventions outcomes. T Sanderson M Morris M Calnan, et al. Arthritis care & research 2010 62 5 647 56 10.1002/acr.20151 21618399
30. Constructing Grounded Theory - A practical guide through Qualitative anaylsis. K Charmaz, London: Sage Publications Ltd 2006
31. The importance of utility balance in efficient choice design. J Huber K Zwerina, Journal of Marketing Research 1996 XXXIII 307 17
32. Profile construction in experimental designs for mixed logit models. Z Sandor M Wedel, Marketing Science 2002 21 4 455 75 10.1287/mksc.21.4.455.131
33. Applied Choice Analysis. A Primer. DA Hensher JM Rose WH Greene, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1 2005
34. Stated Choice Methods - Analysis and Application. J Louviere DA Hensher JD Swait, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000
35. Mixed logit models: state of practice. DA Hensher WH Greene, Transportation 2003 30 2 133 76 10.1023/A:1022558715350 (Pubitemid 36405819)