Whose health service is it anyway? Community values in healthcare

Medical Journal of Australia

Volumn 180, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 76-78

  Mooney, Gavin H ^a   Blackwell, Scott H ^b  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Scarborough Beach Medical Centre   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUSTRALIA; COMMUNITY CARE; CONSULTATION; CONSUMER; GENERAL PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PUBLIC HEALTH; RANDOMIZATION; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; REVIEW; RURAL HEALTH CARE; SOCIAL ASPECT; URBAN AREA; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

EID: 0842270135     PISSN: 0025729X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb05804.x     Document Type: Review

References (18)

1. Medical Council of Western Australia. Health and Economics - Bridging the Abyss. Perth: Health Department of Western Australia, 2000.
2. Medical Council of Western Australia. Citizen's Jury 2001. What's Fair in Health Care. Perth: Health Department of Western Australia, 2001.
3. Mort M, Harrison S. Healthdcare users, the public and the consultation industry. In: T Ling, editor. Reforming Healthcare by Consent: Involving Those Who Matter. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press, 1999.
4. Rousseau J.-J. The Social Contact. Translated by GDH Cole, revised edition. London: J M Dent, 1762.
5. World Health Organization. Report of the Expert Committee on the Health Education of the Public. Technical Report Series 89. WHO: Geneva, 1954.
6. United Nations. Community involvement in pimary health care. A study of the process of community motivation and continued participation. Report for the 1977 UNICEF-WHO Joint Committee on Health Policy, 21st Session. WHO: Geneva, 1977.
7. Vuori H Overview - Community participation in primary health care: A mean or end? IV. International Congress of the World Federation of Public Health Associations. Public Health Rev 1984; 12: 331-339.
8. Cumming J. Core services and priorty setting: The New Zealand experience. Health Policy 1994, 29: 41-60.
9. Kizhaber JA. Prioritising health services in an era of limits: The Oregon experience. BMJ 1993; 307: 373-377.
10. World Health Organization. Renewing the Health for All Strategy. WHO: Geneva, 1995.
11. Leneghan J. Involving the public in rationing decisions. The experience of citizens' juries. Health Policy 1999; 49: 45-61.
12. Dolan P, Olsen JA, Menzel P, Richardson J. An inquiry into the different perspectives that can be used when eliciting preferences in health. Health Econ 2003; 12: 545-552.
13. Black M, Mooney G. Equity in health care from a communitarian standpoint. Health Care Analysis 2002; 10: 193-208.
14. Bowling A. Health care rationing: The public's debate. BMJ 1996; 312: 670-674.
15. Dolan P, Cookson R, Ferguson B. Effect of discussion and deliberation on the public's view of priority setting in health care: Focus group study. BMJ 1999; 318: 916-919.
16. Ryan M, Scott D, Reeves C, et al. Eliciting public preferences for health care: A systematic review of techniques. Health Technol Assess 2001; 5: 5-15.
17. Wiseman V, Mooney G, Berry G, Tang KC. Involving the general public in priority setting: Experiences from Australia. Soc Sci Med 2003; 56: 1001-1012.
18. Mooney G, Wiseman V. A constitution for health services. J Health Serv Res Policy 2000; 4: 1-2.