Comparison of patient-reported and clinician-assessed outcomes following total knee arthroplasty

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 93, Issue 20, 2011, Pages e117(1)-

  Khanna, Gaurav ^a   Singh, Jasvinder A ^b   Pomeroy, Donald L ^c   Gioe, Terence J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b Kirklin Clinic   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE   (United States)

^d VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; GONIOMETRY; HUMAN; KNEE FUNCTION; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; KNEE PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF EVALUATION; SELF REPORT; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT;

EID: 80054852012     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: 15351386     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.j.00850     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bourne RB. Measuring tools for functional outcomes in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:2634-8.
2. Bankes MJ, Coull R, Ferris BD. How long should patients be followed-up after total hip replacement? Current practice in the UK. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1999;81:348-51. (Pubitemid 29419647)
3. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:63-9.
4. Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CM. The reliability of the American Knee Society Score. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000;71:603-8.
5. Medalla GA, Moonot P, Peel T, Kalairajah Y, Field RE. Cost-benefit comparison of the Oxford Knee score and the American Knee Society score in measuring outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:652-6.
6. Gioe TJ, Pomeroy D, Suthers K, Singh JA. Can patients help with long-term total knee arthroplasty surveillance? Comparison of the American Knee Society Score self-report and surgeon assessment. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:160-4.
7. Edwards JZ, Greene KA, Davis RS, Kovacik MW, Noe DA, Askew MJ. Measuring flexion in knee arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplasty. 2004;19:369-72. (Pubitemid 38519833)
8. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J. The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89:1010-4. (Pubitemid 47492792)
9. Singh J, Sloan JA, Johanson NA. Challenges with health-related quality of life assessment in arthroplasty patients: problems and solutions. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18:72-82.
10. Iyer LV, Haley SM, Watkins MP, Dumas HM. Establishing minimal clinically important differences for scores on the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory for inpatient rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2003;83:888-98. (Pubitemid 37237406)
11. Zisapel N, Nir T. Determination of the minimal clinically significant difference on a patient visual analog sleep quality scale. J Sleep Res. 2003;12:291-8. (Pubitemid 38010435)
12. Young BA, Walker MJ, Strunce JB, Boyles RE, Whitman JM, Childs JD. Responsiveness of the Neck Disability Index in patients with mechanical neck disorders. Spine J. 2009;9:802-8.
13. Teeny SM, York SC, Mesko JW, Rea RE. Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons' member survey. J Arthoplasty. 2003;18:954-62. (Pubitemid 38032030)
14. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:780-5. (Pubitemid 46564282)
15. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;87:1487-97. (Pubitemid 40917748)
16. McGrory BJ, Freiberg AA, Shinar AA, Harris WH. Correlation of measured range of hip motion following total hip arthroplasty and responses to a questionnaire. J Arthroplasty. 1996;11:565-71. (Pubitemid 26307026)
17. Miner AL, Lingard EA, Wright EA, Sledge CB, Katz JN; Kinemax Outcomes Group. Knee range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: how important is this as an outcome measure? J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:286-94. (Pubitemid 36542584)
18. Bullens PH, van Loon CJ, de Waal Malefijt MC, Laan RF, Veth RP. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: a comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:740-7.
19. Cohen SB, Strand V, Aguilar D, Ofman JJ. Patient- versus physician-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with recombinant interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (anakinra) therapy. Rheumatology. 2004;43:704-11. (Pubitemid 38811416)
20. Zisapel N, Nir T. Determination of the minimal clinically significant difference on a patient visual analog sleep quality scale. J Sleep Res. 2003;12:291-8. (Pubitemid 38010435)
21. Liow RY, Walker K, Wajid MA, Bedi G, Lennox CM. Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics. 2003;26:143-9. (Pubitemid 36204216)
22. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:100-6. (Pubitemid 39506159)
23. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM. Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;404:7-13. (Pubitemid 35351042)
24. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA, Dittus RS. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. A meta-analysis. JAMA. 1994;271:1349-57. (Pubitemid 24132462)