Cost-Benefit Comparison of the Oxford Knee Score and the American Knee Society Score in Measuring Outcome of Total Knee Arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 652-656

  Medalla, Greg Anthony ^a   Moonot, Pradeep ^a   Peel, Tamlyn ^a   Kalairajah, Yegappan ^a   Field, Richard E ^a  

^a EPSOM GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

American Knee Society score; cost benefit; outcome; Oxford Knee score; total knee arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AMERICAN KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OXFORD KNEE SCORE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 67349142659     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Insall J., Dorr L., Scott R., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orth Rel Res (1989) 13
2. Davies A. Rating systems for total knee replacement. Knee 9 (2002) 261
3. Liow R.Y.L., Walker K., Wajid M.A., et al. Functional rating for knee arthroplasty: comparison of three scoring systems. Orthopedics 26 (2003) 143
4. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80 (1998) 63
5. Liow R., Walker K., Wajid M.A., et al. The Reliability of the AKSS. Ann Orthop Scand 71 (2000) 603
6. Field R.E., Cronin M.D., and Singh P.J. The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87-B (2005) 618
7. Mont M.A., Haas S., Mullick T., et al. Total knee arthroplasty for patellofemoral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A (1977)
8. Sisto D.J., and Mitchell I.L. Unispacer arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87-A (2005) 1706
9. Indelli P.F., Aglietti P., Buzzi R., et al. The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis: a 5- to 9-year follow-up study in osteoarthritis knees. J Arthroplasty 17 (2002) 544
10. Sethuraman V., Mcguigan J., Hozack W.J., et al. Routine follow-up office visits after total joint replacement. Do asymptomatic patients wish to comply. J Arthroplasty 15 (2000) 183
11. Bhatia M., and Obadare Z. An audit of the out-patient follow-ups of hip and knee replacements. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 85 (2003) 32
12. Knee replacement: a guide to good practice. A publication by the British Orthopaedic Association and the British Association for Surgery of the Knee.
13. Teeny S.M., York S.C., Mesko J.W., et al. Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Results of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons' Member Survey. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 954
14. United Kingdom Department of Health Publications and Statistics. Access at. http://www.dh.gov.uk/PublicationsAndStatistics/Publications/Publications Policy AndGuidance/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidanceArticle/fs/en?CONTENT_ID=409152 9&chk=f%2Bcvh [Accessed January 23, 2007]
15. United Kingdom National Joint Registry:. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk [Accessed June 26, 2007]
16. Konig A., Scheidler M., Rader C., et al. The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345 (1997) 161
17. Bremner-Smith A.T., Ewings P., and Weale A.E. Knee scores in a "normal" elderly population. Knee 11 (2004) 279
18. Benjamin J., Johnson R., and Porter S. Knee scores change with length of follow-up after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18 (2003) 867
19. Asif S., and Choon D.S.K. Midterm results of cemented press fit condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Orthop Surg 13 (2005) 280
20. Kuntrapaka S., Macdonald D., Tzioupis C., et al. Role of long stem revision knee prosthesis in periprosthetic and complex distal femoral fractures: a review of eight patients. Injury 36 (2005) 9
21. Kreibich D.N., Vaz M., Bourne R.B., et al. What is the best way of assessing after total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331 (1996) 221
22. Khalily C., and Whiteside L.A. Predictive value of early radiographic findings in cementless total hip arthroplasty femoral components: an 8- to 12-years follow-up. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 768
23. Lavernia C.J. Cost-effectiveness of early surgical intervention in silent osteolysis. J Arthroplasty 13 (1998) 277