The relationships between sequences of affective states and learner achievement

Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computers in Education: Enhancing and Sustaining New Knowledge Through the Use of Digital Technology in Education, ICCE 2010

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 56-60

  Rodrigo, Ma Mercedes T ^a   Baker, Ryan S J D ^b   Nabos, Julieta Q ^a  

^a ATENEO DE MANILA UNIVERSITY   (Philippines)

^b WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Affect sequences; Boredom; Confusion; Engaged concentration; Scatterplot tutor; Student achievement; Student affect

Indexed keywords

AFFECT SEQUENCES; BOREDOM; CONFUSION; SCATTER PLOTS; STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

STUDENTS;

EID: 80054840963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Koedinger, K.R., and Wagner, A.Z. (2004) Off-Task Behavior in the Cognitive Tutor Classroom: When Students "Game the System". Proceedings of ACM CHI 2004: Computer-Human Interaction, 383-390.
2. Baker, R. S. d. J., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., Evenson, S. E., Roll, I., Wagner, A.Z., Naim, M., Raspat, J., Baker, D. J., & Beck, J. (2006). Adapting to when students game an intelligent tutoring system, In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, 392-401.
3. Baker, R. S. d. J., D'Mello, S., Rodrigo, M. M. T. & Graesser. (2010). Better to be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners' Cognitive-Affective States During Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(4), 223-241.
4. Craig, S. D., Graesser, A. C., Sullins, J., & Gholson, B. (2004). Affect and learning: an Exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media, 29(3), 241- 250.
5. Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of the Optimal Experience. New York: Harper Row.
6. D'Mello, S. & Graesser, A. (under review). Dynamics of Cognitive-Affective States During Deep Learning.
7. D'Mello, S. K., Taylor, R., & Graesser, A. C. (2007). Monitoring affective trajectories during complex learning, In D. S. McNamara & J. G. Trafton (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society (pp. 203-208). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
8. Lagud, M. C. V. & Rodrigo, M. M. T. (2010). The affective and learning profilesof students while using an intelligent tutoring system for algebra. 2010 Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference.
9. McQuiggan, S. W., Robinson, J. L., & Lester, J. C. (2010). Affective transitions in narrative centered learning environments. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 40-53.
10. Rodrigo, M. M. T., Agapito, J., Nabos, J., Repalam, M. C., Reyes, S. Jr., & Baker, R. S. J. d. (in preparation). The effects of an embodied conversational agent on student affective dynamics while using an intelligent tutoring system.
11. Rodrigo, M. M. T., Baker, R. S. J. d., Lagud, M. C. V., Lim, S. A. L., Macapanpan, A. F., Pascua, S. A. M. S., Santillano, J. Q., Sevilla, L. R. S., Sugay, J. O., Tep, S., & Viehland, N. J. B. (2007). Affect and usage choices in simulation problem-solving environments. In R. Luckin, K. R. Koedinger, J. Greer (Eds.), Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Technology Rich Learning Contexts that Work, 145-152. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.