Preferences, Behaviors, and Strategies in Multiple-Task Performance

Research in Multi-Level Issues

Volumn 6, Issue , 2007, Pages 239-247

  Waller, Mary J ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34249899922     PISSN: 14759144     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S1475-9144(07)06011-0     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Bluedorn A.C. The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience (2002), Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA
2. Bluedorn, A. C., & Jaussi, K. S. (this volume). Organizationally relevant dimensions of time across levels of analysis. In: F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds), Multi-level issues in organizations and time (Vol. 6). Oxford: Elsevier.
3. Broadbent D. Perception and communication (1958), Pergamon, Oxford, UK
4. Cotte J., and Ratneshwar S. Juggling and hopping: What does it mean to work polychronically?. Journal of Managerial Psychology 14 (1999) 184-204
5. Francis-Smythe J.A., and Robertson I.T. The importance of time congruity in the organization. Applied Psychology: An International Review 52 2 (2003) 298-321
6. Hackman J.R. Teams, leaders, and organizations: New directions for crew-oriented flight training. In: Wiener E.L., Kanki B.G., and Helmreich R.L. (Eds). Cockpit resource management (1993), Academic Press, Orlando, FL 47-69
7. Hall E.T. The dance of life: The other dimension of time (1983), Anchor Press, Garden City, NY
8. Hecht T.D., and Allen N.J. Exploring links between polychronicity and well-being from the perspective of person-job fit: Does it matter if you prefer to do only one thing at a time?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 98 (2005) 155-178
9. Huey B.M., and Wickens C.P. Workload transition: Implications for individual and team performance (1993), National Academy Press, Washington, DC
10. Ishizaka K., Marshall S.P., and Conte J.M. Individual differences in attentional strategies in multitasking situations. Human Performance 14 4 (2001) 339-358
11. Kaplan, S. (2006). The affective bases of team performance during nonroutine events: The case of nuclear power plant control room crews. Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
12. Koch I., Philipp A.M., and Gade M. Chunking in task sequences modulates task inhibition. Psychological Science 17 4 (2006) 346-350
13. Lindbeck A., and Snower D.J. Multitask learning and the reorganization of work: From tayloristic to holistic organization. Journal of Labor Economics 18 3 (2000) 353-376
14. Spink A., Park M., Jansen B.J., and Pedersen J. Multitasking during web search sessions. Information Processing and Management 42 (2006) 264-275
15. Waller, M. J. (1997). Keeping the pins in the air: How work groups juggle multiple tasks. In: M. Beyerlein, D. Johnson & S. Beyerlein (Eds), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (Vol. 4, pp. 217-247). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. Waller M.J. The timing of adaptive group responses to nonroutine events. Academy of Management Journal 42 (1999) 127-137
17. Waller M.J., Conte J.M., Gibson C.G., and Carpenter M.A. The impact of individual time perception on team performance under deadline conditions. Academy of Management Review 26 (2001) 586-600
18. Waller M.J., Giambatista R.C., and Zellmer-Bruhn M.E. The effects of individual time urgency on group polychronicity. Journal of Managerial Psychology 14 3/4 (1999) 244-256
19. Weick K.E. Systematic observational methods. In: Lindzey G., and Aronson E. (Eds). Handbook of social psychology (1968), Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA 357-451
20. Wickens C.D. Processing resources and attention. In: Damos D. (Ed). Multiple-task performance (1991), Taylor & Francis, London 3-34
21. Wickens C.D., and Carswell C.M. The proximity compatibility principle: Its psychological foundation and relevance to display design. Human Factors 37 (1995) 473-494