The Role of Risk in Regulatory Processes

The Oxford Handbook of Regulation

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Black, Julia ^a  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accountability relationships; Decision making; Governance; Regulatory process; Role of risk

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054756021     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199560219.003.0014     Document Type: Chapter

References (176)

1. Baldwin, R. (2005). 'Is Better Regulation Smarter Regulation?', Public Law, 485.
2. Baldwin, R. &Cave, M. (1999). Understanding Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, New Delhi: Sage.
4. BERR (2005). Guidelines on Scientific Advice in Policy Making, London: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
5. BERR (2007). Statutory Code of Practice for Regulators, London: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
6. Better Regulation Commission (BRC) (2006). Risk, Responsibility, Regulation: Whose Risk is it Anyway?, London: Cabinet Office.
7. Better Regulation Commission (BRC) (2008). Public Risk: The Next Frontier for Better Regulation, London: Cabinet Office.
8. Black J. (1998). 'Regulation as Facilitation: Negotiating the Genetic Revolution', Modern Law Review, 61: 621-60.
9. Black J. (2000). 'Proceduralising Regulation: Part I', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 20: 597-614.
10. Black J. (2001). 'Proceduralising Regulation: Part II', Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21: 33-59.
11. Black J. (2005a). 'The Emergence of Risk-Based Regulation and the New Public Risk Management in the UK', Public Law, 512-49.
12. Black J. (2005b). 'The Development of Risk-Based Regulation in Financial Services: Just "Modelling Through"?', in J. Black, M. Lodg E, And M. Thatcher (eds.), Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
13. Black J. (2006). 'Managing Regulatory Risks and Defining the Parameters of Blame: The Case of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority', Law and Policy, 1-27.
14. Black J. (2007). 'The Decentred Regulatory State?', in P. Vass (ed.), CRI Regulatory Review 2006-7 10th Anniversary Edition, Bath: CRI.
15. Black J. (2008a). 'Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes', Regulation and Governance, 2: 1-28.
16. Black J. (2008b). 'Risk Based Regulation: Choices, Practices and Lessons Being Learned', SG/GRP 2008(4), Paris: OECD.
17. Breakwell, G. & Barnett, J. (2001). The Impact of the Social Amplification of Risk on Risk Communication, Health and Safety Executive, Contract Research Report 332/2001, London: HSE.
18. Breyer, S. (1982). Regulation and its Reform, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Brickman, R., Jasanoff, S., & Ilgen, T. (1985). Controlling Chemicals: The Politics of Regulation in Europe and the US, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
20. Brunner, G., Hinz, R., & Rocha, R. (eds.) (2008). Risk-Based Supervision of Pension Funds: Emerging Practices and Challenges, Washington, DC: World Bank.
21. Cabinet Office (2002). Risk: Improving Government's Capability to Handle Risk and Uncertainty, London: Cabinet Office.
22. Cabinet Office (n.d.). Communicating Risk, London: Cabinet Office.
23. Carlyle, T. (1896-9). Collected Works of Thomas Carlyle in 31 Volumes, ed. H. D. TRAILL, London: Chapman and Hall.
24. Chalmers, D. (2003). 'Reconciling European Risks and Traditional Ways of Life', Modern Law Review, 66(4): 532-62.
25. Cohen, M., March, J., & Olsen, J. (1972). 'A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice', Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1): 1.
26. Committee of the Sponsoring Organisations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) (1991). Internal Controls: Integrated Framework, London: COSO.
27. Davies, H. (2005). Regulation and Politics: The New Dialogue, or A Letter to John Redwood, The Hume Lecture 2004, Hume Occasional Paper No. 66, Edinburgh: David Hume Institute.
28. DEFRA (2008). Aarhus Convention Implementation Report, London: Defra.
29. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: Concepts of Pollution of Taboo, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
30. Douglas, M. (1985). Risk Acceptability According to the Social Sciences, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Douglas, M. (1992). Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory, London: Routledge.
32. Douglas, M. And Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and Culture, Berkeley and Los Angeles: UCLA Press.
33. Eberlein, B. & Grande, E. (2005). 'Beyond Delegation: Transnational Regulatory Regimes and the EU Regulatory State', 12/1 Journal of European Public Policy 89-112.
34. EC 882/2004, 'Official Controls Performed to Ensure the Verification of Compliance with Food and Feed Law, Animal Health and Animal Welfare Rules'.
35. Environment Agency (2009). An Environmental Vision, Bristol: Environment Agency.
36. European Commission (1997). Communication on Consumer Health and Food Safety.
37. European Commission (2000). Communication on the Precautionary Principle Brussels, 2.2.2000 COM (2000) 1 final.
38. European Commission (2002). Communication on Collection and Use of Expertise.
39. European Commission (2004). Decision Establishing Scientific Committees in the Field of Consumer Safety, Public Health and the Environment.
40. European Commission (2008). Decision Establishing Scientific Committees in the Field of Consumer Safety, Public Health and the Environment (revised).
41. European Commission Directorate-General for Health and Consumers (2008). The EU Risk Analysis Approach and the Perspectives for Global Risk Assessment Dialogue, presentation to the OECD Group on Regulatory Policy, Paris, 1-2 December.
42. FInancial Services Authority (2003). Reasonable Expectations: Regulation in a Non Zero-Failure World, London: FSA.
43. Financial Services Authority (2006). The FSA's Risk Assessment Framework, London: FSA.
44. Fiorino, D. (1990). 'Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms', Science, Technology, & Human Values, 15(2): 226-43.
45. Fischoff, B. (1995). 'Risk Perception and Communication Unplugged: Twenty Years of Process', Risk Analysis, 15: 137-45.
46. Fischoff, B. Watson, S. R., & Hope, C. (1984). 'Defining Risk', Policy Sciences, 17(2): 123-9.
47. Fisher, E. (2003). 'The Rise of the Risk Commonwealth and the Challenge for Administrative Law', Public Law, 455-78.
48. Fisher, E. (2007). Risk, Regulation and Administrative Constitutionalism, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
49. Fisher, E. (2008a) 'Risk Regulatory Concepts and the Law', SG/GRP 2008(3), Paris: OECD.
50. Fisher, E. (2008b). 'The "Perfect Storm" of REACH: Charting Regulatory Controversy in an Age of Information, Sustainable Development and Globalisation', Journal of Risk Regulation Research, 11: 541-63.
51. Fisher, E. & Harding, R. (1999), Perspectives on the Precautionary Principle, Sydney: Federation Press.
52. Fisher, E. Jones, J., & Von Schumberg, R. (2006). Implementing the Precautionary Principle: Perspectives and Prospects, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
53. Food Standards Agency (2003). 'FSA Board to Consider Replacing OTM Rule with BSE Testing of Cattle', Press Release Monday 7 July 2003, ref. R726-39.
54. FSIS (2007). The Evolution of Risk-Based Inspection, Washington, DC: FSIS.
55. Funtowicz, S. O. & Ravetz, J. R. (1992). 'Three Types of Risk Assessment and the Emergence of Post-Normal Science', in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT: Praeger.
56. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
57. Giddens, A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. Giddens, A. (1999). 'Risk and Responsibility', Modern Law Review, 60(1): 1-10.
59. Gilardi, F. (2005). 'The Institutional Foundations of Regulatory Capitalism: The Diffusion of Independent Regulatory Agencies in Western Europe', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 84-101.
60. Goldstein, B. & Carruthers, R. (2004). 'The Precautionary Principle and/or Risk Assessment in World Trade Organization Decisions: A Possible Role for Risk Perception', Risk Analysis, 24(2): 291-9.
61. Graham, J. & Wiener, J. (1995). Risk vs Risk, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62. Gunningham, N. & Grabosky, P. (1999). Smart Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Hahn, R. & Litan, R. E. (2005). 'Counting Regulatory Benefits and Costs', Journal of International Economic Law, 8(2): 473-508.
64. Haldane, A. (2009). 'Why Banks Failed the Stress Test', speech to Marcus-Evans Conference on Stress-Testing, 9-10 February, available at http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/publications/speeches/2009/speech374.pdf.
65. Hampton, P. (2005). Reduction in Administrative Burdens: Effective Inspection and Enforcement (Hampton Report), London: HM Treasury.
66. Harremoes, P., Gee, D., Mac Garvin, M., Stirling, A., Keys, J., Wynne, B., & Guedes Vaz, S. (2002). The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings, London: Earthscan.
67. Health and Safety Executive (2001). Reducing Risks: Protecting People, London: Health and Safety Executive.
68. Health and Safety Executive (2009). The Health and Safety of Great Britain: Be Part of the Solution, London: Health and Safety Executive.
69. Heyvaert, V. (2006). 'Facing the Consequences of the Precautionary Principle in European Community Law', European Law Review, 31(2): 185-207.
70. Heyvaert, V. (2009). 'Regulating Chemical Risk: REACH in a Global Governance Perspective', in J. Eriksson, M. Gilek, and C. Ruden (eds.), Regulating Chemical Risk: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on European and Global Challenges, Berlin: Springer.
71. HM Treasury (2003). The Risk Programme: Improving Government's Risk Handling, 2nd Report to the Prime Minister: Supporting Analysis: Examples of Good Practice, London: HM Treasury.
72. HM Treasury (2004a). The Orange Book: Management of Risk-Principles and Concepts. London: HM Treasury.
73. HM Treasury (2004b). Managing Risks with Delivery Partners, London: HM Treasury.
74. HM Treasury (2004c). Risk Management Assessment Framework: A Tool for Departments, London: HM Treasury.
75. HM Treasury (2004d). The Risk Programme: Improving Government's Risk Handling: Final Report to the Prime Minister, London: HM Treasury.
76. HM Treasury (2005). Managing Risks to the Public: Appraisal Guidance, London: HM Treasury.
77. HM Treasury (2006). Thinking About Risk: Managing Your Risk Appetite, London: HM Treasury.
78. HM Treasury (n.d.a). Early Management of the Risks to Successful Delivery, London: HM Treasury.
79. HM Treasury (n.d.b). Principles of Managing Risks to the Public, London: HM Treasury.
80. HM Treasury (n.d.c). Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, London: HM Treasury.
81. HM Treasury (n.d.d). Magenta Book: Guidance Notes on Policy Evaluation and Analysis, London: HM Treasury.
82. Hood, C. (2002). 'The Risk Game and the Blame Game', Government and Opposition, 37: 15-37.
83. Hood, C. & Lodg E, M. (2006). 'Pavlovian Innovation, Pet Solutions and Economising on Rationality? Politicians and Dangerous Dogs', in J. Black, M. Lodge, and M. Thatcher (eds.), Regulatory Innovation: A Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
84. Hood, C. Rothstein, H., & Baldwin, R. (2001). The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
85. Hood, C. Scott, C., James, O., Jones., G., & Travers, T. (1999). Regulation inside Government: Waste Watchers, Quality Police and Sleaze Busters, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
86. Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., Rowe, G., Pidgeon, N., Poorting A, W., & O'riordan, T. (2006). 'On Evaluating the GM Nation? Public Debate about the Commercialisation of Transgenic Crops in Britain', New Genetics and Society, 25(3): 265-88.
87. House of Commons Science and Technology Committee (2006). Scientific Advice, Risk and Evidence-Based Policy Making, Seventh Report of the Session 2005-6, HC 900-1, London: The Stationery Office.
88. House of Lords Science and Technology Committee (2000). Science and Society, Session 1999-2000, Third Report, HL 38, London: The Stationery Office.
89. House of Lords Select Committee on Economic Affairs (2006). Government Policy on the Management of Risk, Fifth Report of Session 2005-6, HL 183-1, London: The Stationery Office.
90. Huber, P. (1983). 'The Old-New Division in Risk Regulation', Vanderbilt Law Review, 69: 1025.
91. Hutter, B. (2001). Regulation and Risk: Occupational Health and Safety on the Railways, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
92. Hutter, B. (2005). 'The Attractions of Risk-Based Regulation: Accounting for the Emergence of Risk Ideas in Regulation', CARR Discussion Paper No. 33, London: LSE.
93. Hutter, B. & Lloyd Bostock, S. (2008). 'Reforming Regulation of the Medical Profession: The Risks of Risk-Based Approaches', Health, Risk and Society, 10(1): 69-83.
94. ILGRA (1998). Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Improving Policy and Practice within Government Departments, 2nd Report of the Interdepartmental Liaison Group on Risk Assessment, London: HSE Books.
95. Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment (IEMA) (2002). Perspectives: Guidelines on Participation in Environmental Decision-Making, Lincoln: IEMA.
96. International Organisation of Pension Fund Supervisors (IOPS) (2007). 'Experiences and Challenges with the Introduction of Risk-Based Supervision for Pension Funds', Working Paper No. 4, IOPS.
97. Irwin, A. (2006). 'The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the "New" Scientific Governance', Social Studies of Science, 36(2): 299-321.
98. Irwin, A. & Wynne, B. (1996). Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
99. Jaffe, J. & Savins, R. N. (2007). 'On the Value of Formal Assessment of Uncertainty in Regulatory Analysis', Regulation & Governance, 1(2): 154-71.
100. Jasanoff, S. (1990). The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
101. Jasanoff, S. (2003). 'Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science', Minerva, 41: 223-44.
102. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (eds.) (1982). Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
103. Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). 'Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk', Econometrica, 47: 263-91.
104. Kasperson, R. E. And Kasperson, J. X. (1987). Nuclear Risk Analysis in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105. Kasperson, R. E. And Kasperson, J. X. (1996). 'The Social Amplification and Attenuation of Risk', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 545: 95-105.
106. Kasperson, R. E. Renn, O., Slovic, P., & Brown, H. S. (1988). 'The Social Amplification of Risk: A Conceptual Framework', Risk Analysis, 8(2): 177-87.
107. Klinke, A. & Renn, O. (2001). 'Precautionary Principle and Discursive Strategies: Classifying and Managing Risks', Journal of Risk Research, 4(2): 159-73.
108. Knight, F. (1921). Risk Uncertainty and Profit, Boston: Hart, Shaffner and Marx.
109. Kraus, N., Malmfors, T., & Slovic, P. (1992). 'Intuitive Toxicology: Expert and Lay Judgements of Chemical Risk', Risk Analysis, 12: 215-32.
110. Lang, A. T. F. (2008). 'Provisional Measures under Article 5.7 of the WTO's Agreement on Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures: Some Criticisms of the Jurisprudence So Far', Journal of World Trade, 42(6): 1085-106.
111. Levi-Faur, D. (2005). 'The Global Diffusion of Regulatory Capitalism', Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598: 12-32.
112. Majone, G. (1994). 'The Rise of the Regulatory State in Europe', West European Politics, 17(3): 77-101.
113. Majone, G. (1997). 'From the Positive to the Regulatory State: Causes and Consequences of Changes in the Mode of Governance', Journal of Public Policy, 17(2): 139-68.
114. Majone, G. (2002). 'What Price Safety? The Precautionary Principle and its Policy Implications', Journal of Common Market Studies, (40): 89.
115. Marshall, T. H. (1964). 'Citizenship and Social Class', in Class, Citizenship and Social Development: Essays, New York: Garden City.
116. Marshall, T. H. (1967). Social Policy in the Twentieth Century, 2nd edn., London: Hutchinson.
117. Meyer, J. & Rowan, B. (1977). 'Institutionalised Organisations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony', American Journal of Sociology, 83(2): 340.
118. Mitnick, B. M. (1980). The Political Economy of Regulation: Creating, Designing and Removing Regulatory Forms, New York: Columbia University Press.
119. Moran, M. (2003). The British Regulatory State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
120. National Audit Office (NAO) and Better Regulation Executive (2008). Effective Inspection and Enforcement: Implementing the Hampton Vision in the Health and Safety Executive, London: NAO & BRE.
121. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, New York: Cambridge University Press.
122. Nozick, R. A. (1974). Anarchy, State, Utopia, Oxford: Blackwell.
123. OFGEM (2009). Corporate Strategy and Plan 2009-2014, London: Ofgem.
124. OFT (2008). Prioritisation Principles, OFT 953, London: Office of Fair Trading.
125. OFT (2009). Annual Plan 2009-2010, London: Office of Fair Trading.
126. OFWAT (2008). Ofwat's Strategy: Taking a Forward Look, Birmingham: Ofwat.
127. Ogus, A. (1994). Regulation: Legal Form and Economic Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
128. O'malley, P. (1992). 'Risk, Society and Crime Prevention', Economy and Society, 21(3): 252-75.
129. O'riordan, T. (2002). 'Foreword', in P. Harremoes et al. (eds.), The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings, London: Earthscan.
130. O'riordan, T. & Cameron, J. (2002). Interpreting the Precautionary Principle, London: Cameron May.
131. Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, New York: Basic Books.
132. Pesendorfer, D. (2006). 'EU Environmental Policy under Pressure: Chemicals Policy Change between Antagonistic Goals?', Enviromental Politics, 15: 95-114.
133. Phillips Of Worth Matravers, Lord, Bridgeman, J., & Ferguson-Smith, M. (2000). The BSE Inquiry Report, London: The Stationery Office.
134. Pidgeon, N. (1999a). 'Social Amplification of Risk: Models, Mechanisms and Tools for Policy', Risk, Decision and Policy, 4(2): 145-59.
135. Pidgeon, N. (1999b). 'Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications', Risk, Decision and Policy, 4(1): 1-15.
136. Pidgeon, N. Kasperson, R., & Slovic, P. (2003). 'Amplification of Risk: Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications', Journal of Social Issues, 48(4): 137-60.
137. Pidgeon, N. Poorting A, W., Rowe, G., Horlick-Jones, T., Walls, J., & O'riordan, T. (2005). 'Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision-Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate', Risk Analysis, 25(2): 467-80.
138. Pildes, R., & Sunstein, C. (1995). 'Reinventing the Regulatory State', University of Chicago Law Review, 62: 1.
139. Porter, T. M. (1995). Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
140. Posner, R. A. (2004). Catastrophe: Risk and Response, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
141. Power, M. K. (2007). Organized Uncertainty: Designing and World of Risk Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
142. Randall, E. (2006), 'Not that Soft or Informal: A Response to Eberlein and Grande's Account of Regulatory Governance in the EU with Special Reference to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)', Journal of European Public Policy, 13(3): 402-19.
143. Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), establishing a European Chemicals Agency, amending Directive 1999/45/EC and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC.
144. Renn, O. (1990). 'Risk Perception and Risk Management: A Review', Risk Abstracts, 7: 1-9.
145. Renn, O. (1991). 'Risk Communication and the Social Amplification of Risk', in R. E. Kasperson and P. M. Stallen (eds.), Communicating Risks to the Public: International Perspectives, Dordrecht: Kluwer.
146. Renn, O. (1992). 'Concepts of Risk: A Classification', in S. Krimsky and D. Golding (eds.), Social Theories of Risk, Westport, CT: Praeger.
147. Risk Regulation Advisory Council (RRAC) (2009). Response with Responsibility: Policy Making for Public Risk in the Twenty-First Century, London: Department of Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.
148. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
149. Rothstein, H. & Downer, J. (2008). Risk in Policy Making: Managing the Risks of Risk Governance, London: Report for the Department of the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
150. Rothstein, H. Huber, M., & Gaskell, G. (2006). 'A Theory of Risk Colonisation: The Spiralling Regulatory Logics of Societal and Institutional Risk', Economy and Society, 35(1): 91-112.
151. Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering (2004). Nanoscience and Nanotechnology: Opportunities and Uncertainties, London: Royal Society.
152. Royal Society of Arts (1992). Risk Perception, Management and Communication, London: RSA.
153. Schrader-Frechette, K. S. (1991). Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Popular Reforms, Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
154. Skogstad, G. (2002). 'The WTO and Food Safety Regulatory Policy Innovation in the European Union', Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(3): 484-505.
155. Slorach, S. A. (2008). Food Safety Risk Management in New Zealand: A Review of the New Zealand Food Safety Authority's Risk Management Framework and its Application, Wellington: NZFSA.
156. Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk, London: Earthscan Publications.
157. Slovic, P. Fischoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1976). 'Cognitive Processes and Societal Risk Taking', in J. S. Carroll and J. W. Payne (eds.), Cognition and Social Behaviour, Potomac, MD: Erlbaum.
158. Slovic, P. Fischoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). 'Rating the Risks', Environment, 21(3): 14-20, 36-9.
159. Slovic, P. Fischoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1980). 'Facts and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk', in R. C. Schwing and W. A. Albers Jr (eds.), Societal Risk Assessment: How Safe is Safe Enough?, New York: Plenum.
160. Stern Review (2008). The Economics of Climate Change, London: HM Treasury.
161. Stirling, A. (1994). 'Diversity and Ignorance in Electricity Supply Investments: Addressing the Solution rather than the Problem', Energy Policy, 22: 195-226.
162. Suchman, M. (1995). 'Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches', Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571-610.
163. Sunstein, C. (2002). Risk and Reason, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
164. Sunstein, C. (2005). Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
165. Taylor-Gooby, P. (2006). 'Social Divisions of Trust: Scepticism and Democracy in the GM Nation? Debate', Journal of Risk Research, 9(1): 75-86.
166. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) (2006). Medium Term Strategy, London: The Pensions Regulator.
167. UNECE Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (Aarhaus Convention) 1998.
168. US National Research Council (1996). Understanding Risk, Washington, DC.
169. Viscusi, W. K. (1993). 'The Value of Risks to Life and Health', Journal of Economic Literature, 33: 1912-46.
170. Viscusi, W. K. (2004). 'The Value of Life: Estimates with Risks by Occupation and Industry', Economic Inquiry, 42(1): 29-48.
171. Vogel, D. (2002). Risk Regulation in Europe and the United States, Berkeley, CA: Haas Business School.
172. Vos, E. (2000). 'EU Food Safety Regulation in the Aftermath of the BSE Crisis', Journal of Consumer Policy, 227-55.
173. Vos, E. (2009). 'The EU Regulatory System on Food Safety: Between Trust and Safety', in M. Everson and E. Vos (eds.), Uncertain Risks Regulated, London: Routledge/Cavendish Publishing.
174. Weiner, J. B. & Rogers, M. D. (2002). 'Comparing Precaution in the US and Europe', Journal of Risk Research, 5: 217.
175. Wildavsky, A. (1988). Searching for Safety, London: Transaction Books.
176. Wynne, B. (1996). 'May the Sheep Safely Graze? A Reflexive View of the Expert-Lay Knowledge Divide', in S. Lash, B. Szerszunski, and B. Wynne (eds.), Risk, Environment and Modernity: Towards a New Ecology, London: Sage.