How the shadow of the future might promote cooperation

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 857-870

  van Lange, Paul A M ^a   Klapwijk, Anthon ^a   van Munster, Laura M ^a  

^a VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

human cooperation; reciprocity; shadow of the future; social dilemmas; social value orientation; trust

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054715792     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430211402102     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Axelrod R.The evolution of cooperation. New York: Basic Books; 1984:.
2. Balliet D.,Parks C. D.,Joireman J. A.Social value orientation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis.Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2009;12:533-547.
3. Batson C. D.Why act for the public good?.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 1994;20:603-610.
4. Bendor J.,Kramer R. M.,Stout S.When in doubt...Cooperation in a noisy prisoner's dilemma.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1991;35:691-719.
5. Bo P. D.Cooperation under the shadow of the future: Experimental evidence from infinitely repeated games.American Economic Review. 2005;95:1591-1604.
6. De Cremer D.,Van Vugt M.Social identification effects in social dilemmas: A transformation of motives.European Journal of Social Psychology. 1999;29:871-893.
7. De Dreu C. K. W.,Boles T. L.Share and share alike or winner take all? The influence of social value orientation upon choice and recall of negotiation heuristics.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1998;76:253-276.
8. Fehr E.,Gächter S.Altruistic punishment in humans.Nature. 2002;415:137-140.
9. Gallucci M.,Perugini M.An experimental test of a game-theoretical model of reciprocity.Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2000;13:367-389.
10. Gallucci M.,Perugini M.Information seeking and reciprocity: A transformational analysis.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2003;33:473-495.
11. Haruno M.,Frith C. D.Activity in the amygdala elicited by unfair divisions predicts social value orientation.Nature Neuroscience. 2009;13:160-161.
12. Heide J. B.,Miner A. S.The shadow of the future: The effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation.Academy of Management Journal. 1992;35:265-291.
13. Henrich J.,Boyd R.,Bowles S.,Gintis H.,Fehr E.,Camerer C.,McElreath R.,Gurven M.,Hill K.,Barr A.,Ensminger J.,Tracer D.,Marlow F.,Patton J.,Alvard M.,Gil-White F.,Henrich N."Economic Man" in cross-cultural perspective: Ethnography and experiments from 15 small-scale societies.Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2005;28:795-855.
14. Higgins E. T.(1998). Promotion and prevention: Regulatory focus as a motivational principle. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 1-46). New York:Academic Press.
15. Insko C. A.,Schopler J.,Gaertner L.,Wildschut T.,Kozar R.,Pinter B.,Finkel E.J.,Brazil D. M.,Cecil C. L.,Montoya M. R.Interindividual-intergroup discontinuity reduction through the anticipation of future interaction.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2001;80:95-111.
16. Joireman J.(2005). Environmental problems as social dilemmas: The temporal dimension. In A. Strathman & J. Joireman (Eds.), Understanding behavior in the context of time: Theory, research, and application (pp. 289-304). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Kelley H. H.,Holmes J. W.,Kerr N. L.,Reis H. T.,Rusbult C. E.,Van Lange P. A. M.An atlas of interpersonal situations. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2003:.
18. Kelley H. H.,Thibaut J. W.Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley; 1978:.
19. Klapwijk A.,Van Lange P. A. M.Promoting cooperation and trust in "noisy" situations: The power of generosity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2009;96:83-103.
20. Kollock P.An eye for an eye leaves everyone blind: Cooperation and accounting systems.American Sociological Review. 1993;58:768-786.
21. Kuhlman D. M.,Marshello A.Individual differences in game motivation as moderators of preprogrammed strategic effects in prisoner's dilemma.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1975;32:922-931.
22. McClintock C. G.,Allison S.Social value orientation and helping behavior.Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1989;19:353-362.
23. McClintock C. G.,Liebrand W. B. G.The role of interdependence structure, individual value orientation and other's strategy in social decision making: A transformational analysis.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;55:396-409.
24. Messick D. M.,McClintock C. G.Motivational bases of choice in experimental games.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 1968;4:1-25.
25. Murnighan J. K.,Roth A. E.Expecting continuing play in prisoner's dilemma games.Journal of Conflict Resolution. 1983;27:279-300.
26. Nauta A.,De Dreu C. K. W.,Van der Vaart T.Social value orientation, organizational goal concerns, and interdepartmental problem-solving behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior. 2002;23:199-213.
27. Oates J.,Manica A.,Bshary R.The shadow of the future affects cooperation in a cleaner fish.Current Biology. 2010;20:472-473.
28. Parks C. D.,Rumble A. C.Elements of reciprocity and social value orientation.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2001;27:1301-1309.
29. Penner L. A.,Dovidio J. F.,Piliavin J. A.,Schroeder D. A.Prosocial behavior: Multilevel perspectives.Annual Review of Psychology. 2005;56:365-392.
30. Perugini M.,Gallucci M.Individual differences and social norms: The distinction between reciprocators and prosocials.European Journal of Personality. 2001;15:19-35.
31. Perugini M.,Gallucci M.,Presaghi F.,Ercolani A. P.The personal norm of reciprocity.European Journal of Personality. 2003;17:251-283.
32. Pruitt D. G.,Kimmel M. J.Twenty years of experimental gaming: Critique, synthesis, and suggestions for the future.Annual Review of Psychology. 1977;28:363-392.
33. Rapoport A.Experimental studies of interactive decisions. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990:.
34. Roth A. E.(1995). Introduction to experimental economics. In J. H., Kagel, & A. E., Roth (Eds). Handbook of experimental economics (pp. 3-109). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
35. Roth A. E.,Murnighan J. K.Equilibrium behavior and repeated play in the prisoner's dilemma.Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 1978;17:189-198.
36. Rusbult C. E.,Verette J.,Whitney G. A.,Slovik L. F.,Lipkus I.Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;60:53-78.
37. Sattler D. N.,Kerr N. L.Might versus morality explored: Motivational and cognitive bases for social motives.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1991;60:756-765.
38. Sheldon K. M.Learning the lessons of tit-for-tat: Even competitors can get the message.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;77:1245-1253.
39. Stouten J.,De Cremer D.,Van Dijk E.All is well that ends well, at least for proselfs: Emotional reactions to equality violation as a function of social value orientation.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2005;35:767-783.
40. Van Dijk E.,De Cremer D.,Handgraaf M. J. J.Social value orientations and the strategic use of fairness in ultimatum bargaining.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2004;40:697-707.
41. Van Lange P. A. M.The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;77:337-349.
42. Van Lange P. A. M.,Agnew C. R.,Harinck F.,Steemers F. G.From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;73:1330-1344.
43. Van Lange P. A. M.,Bekkers R.,Schuyt Th.,Van Vugt M.From games to giving: Social value orientation predicts donating to noble causes.Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 2007;29:375-384.
44. Van Lange P. A. M.,Joireman J. A.How can we promote behavior that serves all of us in the future?.Social Issue and Policy Review. 2008;2:127-157.
45. Van Lange P. A. M.,Kuhlman D. M.Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1994;67:126-141.
46. Van Lange P. A. M.,Otten W.,De Bruin E. N. M.,Joireman J. A.Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: Theory and preliminary evidence.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1997;73:733-746.
47. Van Lange P. A. M.,Ouwerkerk J. W.,Tazelaar M. J. A.How to overcome the detrimental effects of noise in social interaction: The benefits of generosity.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2002;82:768-780.
48. Van Lange P. A. M.,Schippers M.,Balliet D.Who volunteers in psychology experiments? An empirical review of prosocial motivation in volunteering.Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;:.
49. Van Lange P. A. M.,Visser K.Locomotion in social dilemmas: How we adapt to cooperative, Tit-For-Tat, and noncooperative partners.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1999;77:762-773.
50. Wolf S. T.,Cohen T. R.,Kirchner J. L.,Rea A.,Montoya R. M.,Insko C. A.Reducing intergroup conflict through the consideration of future consequences.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39:831-841.