Socioeconomic and geographic constraints to access mammography in Brasil, 2003-2008;Condicionantes socioeconômicos e geográficos do acesso à mamografia no Brasil, 2003-2008

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 16, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 3649-3664

  de Oliveira, Evangelina Xavier Gouveia ^a   Pinheiro, Rejane Sobrino ^b   Melo, Enirtes Caetano Praates ^b   Carvalho, Marilia Sá ^a  

^a INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Health service accessibility; Information systems; Mammography

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; TIME;

ADULT; AGED; BRAZIL; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 80054704815     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S1413-81232011001000002     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Elting LS, Cooksley CD, Bekele BN, Giordano SH, Shih YC, Lovell KK, Avritscher EB, Theriault R. Mammography capacity impact on screening rates and breast cancer stage at diagnosis. Am J Prev Med 2009; 37(2):102-108.
2. Hanson K, Montgomery P, Bakker D, Conlon M. Factors influencing mammography participation in Canada: an integrative review of the literature. Curr Oncol 2009; 16(5):65-75.
3. Couture MC, Nguyen CT, Alvarado BE, Velasquez LD, Zunzunegui MV. Inequalities in breast and cervical cancer screening among urban Mexican women. Prev Med 2008 Nov; 47(5):471-476.
4. Zackrisson S, Andersson I, Janzon L, Manjer J, Garne JP. Rate of over-diagnosis of breast cancer 15 years after end of Malmö mammographic screening trial: follow-up study. BMJ 2006; 332(7543):689-692.
5. U. S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 2009; 151(10):716-726.
6. Robles SC, Galanis E. Breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Panam Salud Publica/ Pan Am J Public Health 2002; 11(3):178-185.
7. Sociedade Brasileira de Mastologia (SBM). Recomendações da X Reunião Nacional de Consenso - Rastreamento do câncer de mama na mulher brasileira; São Paulo, 28 de novembro de 2008 [acessado 2011 jan 19]. Disponível em http://www.sbmastologia.com.br/downloads/reuniao_de_consenso_2008.pdf
8. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). World cancer report 2008. Lyon; International Agency for Research on Cancer.
9. Cancer Care Ontario. The Ontario Breast. Screening Program Annual Report 2001/02. p. 1-40
10. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa nacional por amostra de domicílios: síntese de indicadores, 2008. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2009.
11. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Reschke AH, Aft RL. Disparities related to socioeconomic status and access to medical care remain in the United States among women who never had a mammogram. Cancer Causes Control 2003; 14(5):419-425.
12. Siahpush M, Singh GK. Sociodemographic variations in breast cancer screening behavior among Australian women: results from the 1995 National Health Survey. Prev Med 2002; 35(2):174-80.
13. Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M. Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 2004; 54:78-93.
14. Mobley LR, Kuo TMM, Driscoll D, Clayton L, Anselin L. Heterogeneity in mammography use across the nation: separating evidence of disparities from the disproportionate effects of geography. Int J Health Geogr 2008; 7(1):32.
15. Lima-Costa MF, Matos DL. Prevalência e fatores associados à realização da mamografia na faixa etária de 50-69 anos: um estudo baseado na Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios (2003). Cad Saude Publica 2007; 23(7):1665-1673.
16. Novaes HMD, Braga PE, Schout D. Fatores associados à realização de exames preventivos para cancer nas mulheres brasileiras, PNAD 2003. Cien Saude Coletiva 2006; 11(4):1023-1035.
17. Novaes CO, Mattos IE. Prevalência e fatores associados a não utilização de mamografia em mulheres idosas. Cad Saude Publica 2009; 25(Sup. 2):s310-s320.
18. Schootman M, Jeffe DB, Baker EA, Walker MS. Effect of area poverty rate on cancer screening across US communities. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006; 60:202-207.
19. Coughlin SS, Leadbetter S, Richards T, Sabatino SA. Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002. Soc Sci Med 2008; 66(2):260-275.
20. Elkin EB, Ishill NM, Snow JG, Panageas KS, Bach PB, Liberman L, Wang F, Schrag D. Geographic access and the use of screening mammography. Med Care 2010; 48(4):349-356.
21. Barry J, Breen N. The importance of place of residence in predicting late-stage diagnosis of breast or cervical cancer. Health & Place 2005; 11(1):15-29.
22. Maheswaran R, Pearson T, Jordan H, Black D. Socioeconomic deprivation, travel distance, location of service, and uptake of breast cancer screening in North Derbyshire, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 2006: 60(3):208-212.
23. Huang B, Dignan M, Han D & Johnson O. Does distance matter? Distance to mammography facilities and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer in Kentucky. J Rural Health 2009; 25(4):366-371.
24. Sclowitz ML, Menezes AMB, Gigante DP, Tessaro S. Condutas na prevenção secundária do câncer de mama e fatores associados. Rev Saúde 2005; 39(3): 340-349.
25. Brasil. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão, Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Um Panorama da Saúde no Brasil: Acesso e utilização dos serviços, condições de saúde e fatores de risco e proteção à saúde 2008 [Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios]. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2010. 256 p.
26. Magalhães VCL, Costa MCE, Pinheiro RS. Perfil do atendimento no SUS às mulheres com câncer de mama atendidas na cidade do Rio de Janeiro: relacionando os sistemas de informações SIH E APACSIA. Cad. Saude Coletiva 2006; 14(2):375-398.
27. Duffy SW, Tabar L, Olsen AH, Vitak B, Allgood PC, Chen THH, Yen AMF, Smith RA. Absolute numbers of lives saved and overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening, from a randomized trial and from the Breast Screening Programme in England. J Med Screen 2010; 17:25-30.
28. Jorgensen KJ, Gotzsche PC. Overdiagnosis in publicly organised mammography screening programmes: systematic review of incidence trends. BMJ 2009; 339(9);b2587.
29. Ryerson AB, Miller JW, Eheman CR, Leadbetter S, White MC. Recent trends in U.S. mammography use from 2000-2006: a population-based analysis. Prev Med 2008; 47(5):477-482.
30. Travassos C, Viacava F, Pinheiro RS, Brito AS. Utilização dos serviços de saúde no Brasil: gênero, características familiares e condição social. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2002; 11(5/6):365-373.
31. Autier, P; DA, Ouakrim, DA. Determinants of the number of mammography units in 31 countries with significant mammography screening. Br J Cancer 2008; 99(7):1185-1190.
32. Wang F, McLafferty S, Escamilla V, Luo L. Late- Stage Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Health Care Access in Illinois. Professional Geographer 2008; 60(1):54-69
33. Thuler LCS, Mendonça GA. Estadiamento inicial dos casos de câncer de mama e colo do útero em mulheres brasileiras. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2005; 27(11):656-660.
34. Pruitt SL, Shim MJ, Mullen PD, Vernon SW, Amick BC. Association of area socioeconomic status and breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2009; 18(10):2579-2599.
35. McElroy JA, Remington PL, Gangnon RE, Hariharan L, Andersen LD. Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system. Prev Chronic Dis 2006; 3(1):A10.