Identifying geographic disparities in the early detection of breast cancer using a geographic information system

Preventing Chronic Disease

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  McElroy, Jane A ^a   Remington, Patrick L ^a   Gangnon, Ronald E ^b   Hariharan, Luxme ^c   Andersen, LeAnn D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84978396727     PISSN: 15451151     EISSN: 21665435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L. Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control 2004;15:159-70.
2. Roche LM, Skinner R, Weinstein RB. Use of a geographic information system to identify and characterize areas with high proportions of distant stage breast cancer. J Public Health Manag Pract 2002;8:26-32.
3. Lee CH. Screening mammography: proven benefit, continued controversy. Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40:395-407.
4. Nystrom L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjold B, Rutqvist LE. Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 2002;359:909-19.
5. Mandelblatt J, Saha S, Teutsch S, Hoerger T, Siu AL, Atkins D, et al. The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2003;139:835-42.
6. Rimer BK. Understanding the acceptance of mammography by women. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 1992;14:197-203.
7. Fox SA, Stein JA. The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups. Med Care 1991;29:1065-82.
8. Haiart DC, McKenzie L, Henderson J, Pollock W, McQueen DV, Roberts MM, et al. Mobile breast screening: factors affecting uptake, efforts to increase response and acceptability. Public Health 1990;104:239-47.
9. Thompson GB, Kessler LG, Boss LP. Breast cancer screening legislation in the United States. Am J Public Health 1989;79:1541-3.
10. Zapka JG, Harris DR, Hosmer D, Costanza ME, Mas E, Barth R. Effect of a community health center intervention on breast cancer screening among Hispanic American women. Health Serv Res 1993;28:223-35.
11. Breen N, Figueroa JB. Stage of breast and cervical cancer diagnosis in disadvantaged neighborhoods: a prevention policy perspective. Am J Prev Med 1996;12:319-26.
12. Andersen MR, Yasui Y, Meischke H, Kuniyuki A, Etzioni R, Urban N. The effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Am J Prev Med 2000;18:199-207.
13. Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, Moe RE. Changing incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;75:259-68.
14. Millikan R, Dressler L, Geradts J, Graham M. The need for epidemiologic studies of in-situ carcinoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1995;35:65-77.
15. Ernster VL, Barclay J, Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Henderson C. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. JAMA 1996;275:913-8.
16. Claus EB, Stowe M, Carter D. Breast carcinoma in situ: risk factors and screening patterns. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1811-7.
17. May DS, Lee NC, Richardson LC, Giustozzi AG, Bobo JK. Mammography and breast cancer detection by race and Hispanic ethnicity: results from a national program (United States). Cancer Causes Control 2000;11:697-705.
18. Lantz P, Bunge M, Remington PL. Trends in mammography in Wisconsin. Wis Med J 1990;89:281-2.
19. Lantz PM, Remington PL, Newcomb PA. Mammography screening and increased incidence of breast cancer in Wisconsin. J Natl Cancer Inst 1991;83:1540-6.
20. Bush DS, Remington PL, Reeves M, Phillips JL. In situ breast cancer correlates with mammography use, Wisconsin: 1980-1992. Wis Med J 1994;93:483-4.
21. Propeck PA, Scanlan KA. Breast imaging trends in Wisconsin. WMJ 2000;99:42-6.
22. Fowler BA. Variability in mammography screening legislation across the states. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000;9:175-84.
23. U.S. Census Bureau. 1990 Summary Tape File 3 (STF 3)- sample data. Census of Population and Housing. Washington (DC): American Factfinder;1990. Available from: URL: http://www.census.gov/main/www/cen1990.html.
24. Gelman A. Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical models. New York: Columbia University; 2004.
25. Besag J, York J, Mollié A. Bayesian image restoration with applications in spatial statistics. Annals of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics 1991;43:1-20.
26. Schwarz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 1978;6:461-4.
27. Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N, Lunn D. WinBUGS: Bayesian inference using Gibbs Sampling. London (UK): MRC Biostatistics Unit; 2004.
28. Andersen LD, Remington PL, Trentham-Dietz A, Robert S. Community trends in the early detection of breast cancer in Wisconsin, 1980-1998. Am J Prev Med 2004;26:51-5.
29. Wells BL, Horm JW. Stage at diagnosis in breast cancer: race and socioeconomic factors. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1383-5.
30. Simon MS, Gimotty PA, Coombs J, McBride S, Moncrease A, Burack RC. Factors affecting participation in a mammography screening program among members of an urban Detroit health maintenance organization. Cancer Detect Prev 1998;22:30-8.
31. Cooper JK, Heald K, Samuels M, Coleman S. Rural or urban practice: factors influencing the location decision of primary care physicians. Inquiry 1975;12:18-25.
32. Rogers EM. Diffusion of innovations. New York (NY): Free Press; 2003.
33. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM. Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 1993;83:53-60.
34. Bradley CJ, Given CW, Roberts C. Disparities in cancer diagnosis and survival. Cancer 2001;91:178-88.
35. Zapka JG, Hosmer D, Costanza ME, Harris DR, Stoddard A. Changes in mammography use: economic, need, and service factors. Am J Public Health 1992;82:1345-51.
36. Remington PL, Lantz PM. Using a population-based cancer reporting system to evaluate a breast cancer detection and awareness program. CA Cancer J Clin 1992;42:367-71.
37. Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J, Swanson MS, Swanson FH, Edwards MS. Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. JAMA 1998;279:1801-7.
38. Chen VW, Wu XC, Andrews PA. Cancer in North America, 1991-1995, Vol I: Incidence. Sacramento (CA): North American Association of Central Cancer Registries; 1999.