Factors associated to the performance of preventive cancer exams in Brazilian women, PNAD 2003;Fatores associados à realização de exames preventivos para cancer nas mulheres brasileiras, PNAD 2003

Ciencia e Saude Coletiva

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1023-1035

  Novaes, Hillegonda Maria Dutilh ^a   Braga, Patrícia Emilia ^a   Schout, Denise ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cancer screening; Mammography; Papanicoloau; Population survey

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845348628     PISSN: 14138123     EISSN: 16784561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-81232006000400023     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Althuis MD, Dozier JM, Anderson WF, Devesa SS, Brinton LA. Global trends in breast cancer incidence and mortality 1993-1997. Int J Epidemiol 2005; 34(2):405-12.
2. Selvin E, Brett KM. Breast and cervical cancer screening: sociodemographic predictors among white, black, and Hispanic women. Am J Public Health 2003; 93(4):618-23.
3. Blumenthal, PD, Gaffikin L. Cervical cancer prevention: making programs more appropriate and pragmatic. JAMA 2005; 294(17):2225-8.
4. Hoffman M, Cooper D, CarraraH, Rosenberg L, Kelly J, Stander I, Williamson A-L, Denny L, Toit G, Shapiro S. Limited pap screening associated with reduced risk of cervical cancer in South Africa. Int J Epidemiol 2003; 32:573-7.
5. Hendrick RE, Klabunde C, Grivegnee A, Pou G, Ballard-Barbash R Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries. Int J Qual Health Care 2002; 14(3):219-26.
6. Coffield AB, Maciosek MV, McGinnis M, Harris JR, Caldwell MB, Teutsch SM et al. Priorities among recommended clinical preventive services. Am J Prev Med 2001; 21:1-9.
7. Stout NK, Rosenberg MA, Trentham-Dietz A, Smith MA, Robinson SM, Fryback DG. Retrospective costeffectiveness analysis of screening mammography. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006; 98:774-82.
8. Freedman DA, Petitti DB, Robins JM. On the efficacy of screening for breast cancer. Int JEpidemiol 2004; 33:43-55.
9. Jelinski SE, Maxwell CJ, Onysko J, Bancej CM. The influence of breast self-examination on subsequent manimography participation. Am J Public Health 2005; 95(3):506-11.
10. Leyden W A, Manos MM, Geiger AM, Weinmamn S, Mouchawar J, Bischoff K, Yood MU, Gilbert J, Taplin SH. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. JNatl Cancer Inst 2005; 97(9):675-83.
11. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Hall HI, Logan P, Uhler RJ. Breast and cervical carcinoma screening practices among women in rural and nonrural areas of the United States, 1998-1999. Cancer 2002; 94(11):2801-12.
12. Hagoel L, Ore L, Neter E, Shifroni G, Rennert G. The gradient in mammography screening behavior: a lifestyle marker. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48:1281-90.
13. Ogedegbe G, Casselis AN, Robinson MS, Duhamel K, Tobin JN, Sox CH, Dietrich AJ. Perceptions of barriers and facilitators of cancer early detection among low-income minority women in community health centers. J Natl Med Assoc 2005; 97(2): 162-70.
14. Gupta S, Roos, LL, Walld R, Traverse D, Dahl M. Delivering equitable care: comparing preventive services in manitoba. Am J Public Health 2003; 93(12):2086-91.
15. Kesic V, Markovic M, Matejic B, Topic L. Awareness of cervical cancer screening among women in Serbia. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99(3Suppl 1):S222-S225.
16. Lairson DR, Chan W, Newmark GR. Determinants of the demand for breast cancer screening among women veterans in the United States. Soc Sci Med 2005; 61:1608-17.
17. Aldridge ML, Daniels JL, Jukic AM. Mammograms and healthcare access among US Hispanic and non-hispanic women 40 years and older. Fam Community Health 2006; 29(2):80-8.
18. D'Orsi C, Tu S-P, Nakano C, Carney PA, Abraham LA, Taplin SH, Hendrick RE, Cutter GR, Berns E, Barlow W, Elmore JG. Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist? Radiology 2005; 235:391-5
19. Domenighetti O, D'Avanzo B, Egger M, Berrino F, Perneger T, Mosconi P, Zwahlen M. Women's perception of the benefits of mammography screening: population-based survey in four contries. Int. JEpidemiol 2003; 32:816-21.
20. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Institute Nacional de Cancer - INCA Programa Nacional de Controle do Cancer do Colo de Útero eMama. Ministério da Saúde - INCA2005b. Disponível em: http://www.inca.gov.br/impressão 31/03/06.
21. Pinho AA, França Jr I, Schraiber LB, D'Oliveira AFPL Coberturae motives para arealização ou não do teste de Papanicolaou no Município de São Paulo. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19(supl.2):S303-S313.
22. Hackenhaar AA, Cesar JA, Dominuges MR. Exam e citopatológico decolo uterino em mulheres com idade entre 20 e 59 anos de idade em Pelotas, RS: prevalência, foco e fatores associados à suanão realização. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2006; 9:103-11.
23. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Inquérito Domiciliar sobre Comportamento de Risco e Morbidade Referida de Doenças e Agravos Não Transmissíveis. Ministério da Saúde - INCA 2004b [citado jun 2004]; [30p]. Disponível em: http://www.inca.gov.br/ publicacoes/publicacao_inquerito22_06.pdf
24. Leal MC, Gama SGN, Prias P, Szwarcwald CL. Healthy lifestyles and access to periodic health exams among Brazilian women. Cad Saúde Pública 2005; 21 (Suppl): S78-S88.
25. Brasil. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografiae Estatística - IBGE Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílies - Acesso e utilização de services de saúde. IBGE, 2005a; 172p.
26. Maeda MYS, Loreto C, Barreto E, Cavaliere MJ, Utagawa ML Sakai YI et al. Estudo preliminar do SISCOLO. Qualidade na rede pública de São Paulo. J Bras Patol Med Lab 2004; 40:425-9.
27. Satter DE, Seals BF, Chia J, Gatchell M, Burhansstipanov L, Tsai L. American Indians and Alaska natives in California: women's cancer screening and results. J Cancer Educ 2005; 20(Suppl.):58-64.
28. Lynge, E, Olsen, H, Fracheboud, J, Patnick, J. Reporting of performance indicators of mammography screening in Europe. Eur J Cancer Prev 2003; 12 (3):213-22.
29. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Controle do câncer de mama - documente de consenso. Rev Bras Cancerol 2004a; 50(2):77-90.