Monitoring of healing by ultrasound with color power doppler after root canal treatment of maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions

Journal of Conservative Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 252-257

  Maity, Ipsita ^a   Kumari, Anitha ^a   Shukla, Anil Kumar ^b   Usha, H L ^a   Naveen, D N ^a  

^a V S Dental College and Hospital ^*  (India)

^b KEMPEGOWDA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

Color power doppler; Healing; Neovascularization; Periapical lesion; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054690926     PISSN: 09720707     EISSN: 09745203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.85804     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Gundappa M, Ng SY, Whaites EJ. Comparison of ultrasound, digital and conventional radiography in differentiating periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006;35:326-33. (Pubitemid 44433880)
2. Cotti E, Campisi G, Garauand V, Puddu G. A new technique for the Study of periapical bone lesions: Ultrasound Real Time Imaging. Int Endod J 2002;35:148-52.
3. Cotti E, Campisi G, Ambu R, Dettori C. Ultrasound real time imaging in the differential diagnosis of periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2003;36:556- 63. (Pubitemid 37243863)
4. Rajendran N, Sundaresan B. Efficacy of ultrasound and color power doppler as a monitoring tool in the healing of endodontic periapical lesions. J Endod 2007;33:181-6.
5. Zehnder M. Root canal irrigants. J Endod 2006;32:389-98. (Pubitemid 44316710)
6. Van der Sluis LW, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. Passive ultrasonic irrigation of the root canal: A review of the literature. Int Endod J 2007;40:415-26.
7. Van der Sluis LW, Shemesh H, Wu MK, Wesselink PR. An evaluation of the influence of passive ultrasonic irrigation on the seal of root canal fillings. Int Endod J 2007;40:356-61.
8. Wang CS, Arnold RR, Trope M, Teixeira FB. Clinical efficiency of 2% chlorhexidine gel in reducing intracanal bacteria. J Endod 2007;33:1283- 9.
9. Carvalho FB, Gonçalves M, Tanomaru-Filho M. Evaluation of chronic periapical lesions by digital subtraction radiography by using Adobe Photoshop CS: A technical report. J Endod 2007;33:493-7.
10. Guneri P, Akdeniz BG. Fradulent management of digital endodontic images. Int Endod J 2004;37:214-20. (Pubitemid 38392434)
11. Mikrogeorgis G, Lyroudia K, Molyvdas I, Nikolaidis N, Pitas I. Digital radiograph registration and subtraction: A useful tool for the evaluation of the progress of chronic apical periodontitis. J Endod 2004;30:513-6.
12. Zakariasen KL, Scott DA, Jensen JR. Endodontic recall radiographs: How reliable is our interpretation of endodontic success or failure and what factors affect our reliability?. Oral Surg 1984;57:343-7.
13. Abu-Serriah M, Ayoub A, Boyd J, Paterson C, Wray D. The role of ultrasound in monitoring reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 2003;32:619-27. (Pubitemid 37461504)
14. Cotti E, Vargiu P, Dettori C, Mallarini G. Computerized tomography in the management and follow-up of extensive periapical lesion. Endod Dent Traumatol 1999;15:186-9.
15. Agarwal V, Logani A, Shah N. The evaluation of Computed Tomography Scans and Ultrasounds in the Differential Diagnosis of Periapical Lesions. J Endod 2008;34:1312-5.