Polarization effects in molecular interactions

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science

Volumn 1, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 844-854

  Luque, F Javier ^a   Dehez, François ^b   Chipot, Christophe ^b,c   Orozco, Modesto ^a,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^d INSTITUTE FOR RESEARCH IN BIOMEDICINE   (Spain)

^e BARCELONA SUPERCOMPUTING CENTER   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX CHEMICALS; CURRENT STATUS; GROWING BODIES; LOCAL ELECTRIC FIELD; MOLECULAR SIMULATIONS; NON-ADDITIVE; POLARIZABLE FORCE FIELD; POLARIZATION EFFECT;

ELECTRIC FIELDS;

MOLECULAR STRUCTURE;

EID: 80054682448     PISSN: 17590876     EISSN: 17590884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/wcms.32     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Orozco M, Luque FJ. Theoretical methods for the description of the solvent effect in biomolecular systems. Chem Rev 2000, 100:4187-4225.
2. Cramer CJ. Essentials of Computational Chemistry. Theories and Models. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
3. Tomasi J, Mennucci B, Cammi R. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. Chem Rev 2005, 105:2999-3094.
4. Åqvist J, Warshel A. Simulation of enzyme reactions using valence bond force fields and other hybrid quantum7classical approaches. Chem Rev 1993, 93:2523-2544.
5. Monard G, Merz Jr. KM. Combined quantum mechanical/molecular mechanical methodologies applied to biomolecular systems. Acc Chem Res 1999, 32:904-911.
6. Ruiz-López MF, Rivail JL. In: Schleyer PvR, Allinger NL, Clark T, Gasteiger J, Kollman PA, Schaffer III HF, Schreiner PR, eds. Encyclopedia of Computational Chemistry. Vol 1. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1998, 437-448.
7. van Gunsteren WF, Weiner PK, Wilkinson AJ Computer Simulation of Biomolecular Systems. Theoretical and Experimental Applications. Vol 3. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 1997.
8. Adcock SA, McCammon JA. Molecular dynamics: survey of methods for simulating the activity of proteins. Chem Rev 2006, 106:1589-1615.
9. Berendsen HJC, Grigera JR, Straatsma TP. The missing term in effective pair potentials. J Phys Chem 1987, 91:6269-6271.
10. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 1983, 79:926-935.
11. Bonaccorsi R, Petrongolo C, Scrocco E, Tomasi J. Theoretical investigations on the solvation process. Theor Chim Acta 1971, 20:331-342.
12. Momany FA. Determination of partial atomic charges from ab initio molecular electrostatic potentials. Application formamide, methanol, and formic acid. J Phys Chem 1978, 82:592-601.
13. Cox SR, Williams DE. Representation of the molecular electrostatic potential by a net atomic charge model. J Comput Chem 1981, 2:304-323.
14. Hensen C, Hermann JC, Nam K, Ma S, Gao J, Höltje HD. A combined QM/MM approach to protein-ligand interactions: polarization effects of the HIV-1 protease on selected high affinity inhibitors. J Med Chem 2004, 47:6673-6680.
15. Harder MacKerell AD Jr, Roux B. Many-body polarization effects and the membrane dipole potential. J Am Chem Soc 2009, 131:2760-2761.
16. Stone AJ. The Theory of Intermolecular Forces. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1996.
17. Donchev AG, Ozrin VD, Subbotin MV, Tarasov OV, Tarasov VI. A quantum mechanical polarizable force field for biomolecular interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:7829-7834.
18. Donchev AG, Galkin NG, Pereyaslavets LB, Tarasov VI. Quantum mechanical polarizable force field (QMPFF3): refinement and validation of the dispersion interaction for aromatic carbon. J Chem Phys 2007, 125:244107-244119.
19. Gresh N, Piquemal J-P, Krauss M. Representation of Zn(II) complexes in polarizable molecular mechanics. Further refinements of the electrostatic and short-reange contributions. Comparisons with parallel ab initio computations. J Comput Chem 2005, 26:1113-1130.
20. Piquemal J-P, Chevreau H, Gresh N. Toward a separate reproduction of the contributions to the Hartree-Fock and DFT intermolecular interaction energies by polarizable molecular mechanics with the SIBFA potential. J Chem Theor Comput 2007, 3:824-837.
21. Gresh N, Cisneros GA, Darden TA, Piquemal J-P. Anisotropic, polarizable molecular mechanics studies of inter-and intramolecular interactions and ligand-macromolecule complexes. A bottom-up strategy. J Chem Theor Comput 2007, 3:1960-1986.
22. Ren P, Ponder JW. Consistent treatment of inter- and intramolecular polarization in molecular mechanics calculations. J Comput Chem 2002, 23:1497-1506.
23. Ren P, Ponder JW. Polarizable atomic multipole water model for molecular mechanics simulation. J Phys Chem B 2003, 107:5933-5947.
24. Grossfield A, Ren P, Ponder JW. Ion solvation thermodynamics from simulation with a polarizable force field. J Am Chem Soc 2003, 125:15671-15682.
25. Ren P, Ponder JW. Temperature and pressure dependence of the AMOEBA water model. J Phys Chem B 2004, 108:13427-13437.
26. Ponder JW, Wu C, Ren P, Pande VS, Chodera JD, Schnieders MJ, Haque I, Mobley DL, Lambrecht DS, DiStasio RA Jr, et al. Current status of the AMEOBA polarizable force field. J Phys Chem B 2010, 114:2549-2564.
27. Kitaura K, Morokuma K. A new energy decomposition scheme for molecular interactions within the Hartree-Fock approximation. Int J Quantum Chem 1976, 10:325-340.
28. Sokalski WA, Roszak S, Hariharan PC, Kaufman J. Improved SCF interaction energy decomposition scheme corrected for basis set superposition effect. Int J Quantum Chem 1983, 23:847-854.
29. Cammi R, Bonaccorsi R, Tomasi J. Counterpoise corrections to the interaction energy components in bimolecular complexes 1985, 68:271-283.
30. n molecules from derivative Hartree-Fock theory. J Phys Chem 1987, 91:1749-1754.
31. Celebi N, Angyán JG, Dehez F, Millot C, Chipot C. Distributed polarizabilities derived from induction energies: a finite perturbation approach. J Chem Phys 2000, 112:2709-2717.
32. Frey R, Davidson ER. Energy partitioning of the self-consistent field interaction energy of ScCO. J Chem Phys 1989, 90:5555-5562.
33. Cybulski SM, Scheiner S. Comparison of Morokuma and perturbation theory approaches to decomposition of interaction energy. (NH4)+...NH3 Chem Phys Lett 1990, 166:57-64.
34. Chen W, Gordon MS. Energy decomposition analyses for many-body interaction and application to water complexes. J Phys Chem 1996, 100:14316-14328.
35. Stevens WJ, Fink WH. Frozen fragment reduced variational sapce analysis of hydrogen bonding interactions. Application to the water dimer. Chem Phys Lett 1987, 139:15-22.
36. Glendening E. Natural energy decomposition analysis: extension to density functional methods and analysis of cooperative effects in water. J Phys Chem A 2005, 109:11936-11940.
37. Fedorov DG, Kitaura K. Pair interaction energy decomposition analysis. J Comput Chem 2006, 28:222-237.
38. Jeziorski B, Moszynski R, Szalewicz K. Perturbation theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der Waals complexes. Chem Rev 1994, 94:1887-1930.
39. Misquitta J, Szalewicz K. Intermolecular forces from asymptotically corrected density functional description of monomers. Chem Phys Lett 2002, 357:301-306.
40. Hesselmann A, Jansen G. First-order intermolecular interaction energies from Kohn-Sham orbitals. Chem Phys Lett 2002, 357:464-470.
41. Fiethen A, Jansen G, Hesselmann A, Schütz M. Stacking energies for average B-DNA structures from the combined density functional theory and symmetry-adapted perturbation theory approach. J Am Chem Soc 2008, 130:1802-1803.
42. - and anilide with HF in terms of symmetry-adapted perturbation, atoms in molecules, and natural bond orbital theories. J Phys Chem A 2008, 112:9895-9905.
43. Soteras I, Orozco M, Luque FJ. Induction effects in metal cation-benzene complexes. Phys Chem Chem Phys 2008, 10:2616-2624.
44. Riley KE, Hobza P. Investigations into the nature of halogen bonding including symmetry adapted perturbation theory analyses. J Chem Theor Comput 2008, 4:232-242.
45. Wheatley RJ, Lilestolen TC. Calculating intermolecular potentials with SIMPER: the water-nitrogen and water-oxygen interactions, dispersion energy coefficients, and preliminary results for larger molecules. Int Rev Phys Chem 2007, 26:449-485.
46. Bichoutskaia E, Tulegenov AS, Wheatley RJ. Intermolecular potential energy extrapolation method for weakly bound systems: Ar2, Ar-H2 and AR-HF dimers. Mol Phys 2004, 102:567-577.
47. Gordon MS, Freitag MA, Bandyopadhyay P, Jensen JH, Kairys V, Stevens WJ. The effective fragment potential method: a QM-based MM approach to modeling environmental effects in chemistry. J Phys Chem A 2001, 105:293-307.
48. Gordon MS, Slipchenko LV, Li H, Jensen JH. The effective fragment potential: a general method for predicting intermolecular interactions. Ann Rep Comput Chem 2007, 3:177-193.
49. Rappé AK, Goddard WA III. Charge equilibration for molecular dynamics simulations. J Phys Chem 1991, 95:3358-3363.
50. Rick SW, Stuart SJ, Berne BJ. Dynamical fluctuating charge force fields: application to liquid water. J Chem Phys 1994, 101:6141-6156.
51. Martin MG, Chen B, Siepmann JI. A novel Monte Carlo algorithm for polarizable force fields: application to a fluctuating charge model for water. J Chem Phys 1998, 108:3383-3385.
52. Banks JL, Kaminsky GA, Zhou R, Mainz DT, Berne BJ, Friesner RA. Parametrizing a polarizable force field from ab initio data. I. the fluctuating point charge model. J Chem Phys 1999, 110:741-754.
53. Bret C, Field MJ, Hemmingsen L. A chemical potential equalization model for treating polarization in molecular mechanical force fields. Mol Phys 2000, 98:751-763.
54. Applequist J, Carl JR, Fung K-K. An atom dipole interaction model for molecular polarizability. Application to polyatomic molecules and determination of atom polarizabilities. J Am Chem Soc 1972, 94:2952-2960.
55. Warshel A, Levitt M. Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions: dielectric, electrostatic and steric stabilization of the carbonium ion in the reaction of lysozyme. J Mol Biol 1976, 103:227-249.
56. Caldwell J, Dang LX, Kollman PA. Implementation of nonadditive intermolecular potentials by use of molecular dynamics: development of a water-water potential and water-ion cluster interactions. J Am Chem Soc 1990, 112:9144-9147.
57. Kaminski GA, Stern HA, Berne BJ, Friesner RA. Development of an accurate and robust polarizable molecular mechanics force field from ab initio quantum chemistry. J Phys Chem A 2004, 108:621-627.
58. Chipot C, Ángyán JG. Continuing challenges in the parametrization of intermolecular force fields. Towards an accurate description of electrostatic and induction terms. New J Chem 2005, 29:411-420.
59. Angyán JG, Chipot C, Dehez F, Hättig C, Jansen G, Millot C. OPEP: a tool for the optimal partitioning of electric properties. J Comput Chem 2003, 24:997-1008.
60. Lamoureux G, Roux B. Modeling induced polarization with classical Drude oscillators: theory and molecular dynamics simulation algorithm. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:3025-3039.
61. Lamoureux G, MacKerell AD Jr, Roux B. A simple polarizable model of water based on classical Drude oscillators. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:5185-5197.
62. Yu H, Hansson T, van Gunsteren WF. Development of a simple, self-consistent polarizable model for liquid water. J Chem Phys 2003, 118:221-234.
63. Geerke DP, van Gunsteren WF. On the calculation of atomic forces in classical simulation using the charge-on-spring method to explicitly treat electronic polarization. J Chem Theor Comput 2007, 3:2128-2137.
64. Lopes PEM, Lamoureux G, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Polarizable empirical force field for aromatic compounds based on the classical Drude oscillator. J Phys Chem B 2007, 111:2873-2885.
65. Dehez F, Chipot C, Millot C, Angyán JG. Fast and accurate determination of induction energies: reduction of topologically distributed polarizability models. Chem Phys Lett 2001, 338:180-188.
66. Miller KJ. Additivity methods in molecular polarizability. J Am Chem Soc 1990, 112:8533-8542.
67. Stout JM, Dykstra CE. Static dipole polarizabilities or organic molecules: ab initio calculations and a predictive model. J Am Chem Soc 1995, 117:5127-5132.
68. Bayly CI, Cieplak P, Cornell WD, Kollman PA. A well-behaved electrostatic potential based method using charge restraints for deriving atomic charges: the RESP model. J Phys Chem 1993, 97:10269-10280.
69. Stern HA, Kaminski GA, Banks JL, Zhou R, Berne BJ, Friesner RA. Fluctuating charge, polarizable dipole, and combined models: parameterization from ab initio quantum chemistry. J Phys Chem B 1999, 103:4730-4737.
70. Anisimov VM, Lamoureux G, Vorobyov I, Huang N, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Determination of electrostatic parameters for a polarizable force field on the classical Drude oscillator. J Chem Theor Comput 2005, 1:153-168.
71. Luque FJ, Orozco M. Polarization effects in generalized molecular interaction potential: new Hamiltonian for reactivity studies and mixed QM/MM calculations. J Comput Chem 1998, 19:866-881.
72. Francl MM. Polarization corrections to electrostatic potentials. J Phys Chem 1985, 89:428-433.
73. Handy NC, Schaefer HF III. On the evaluation of analytic energy derivatives for correlated wave functions. J Chem Phys 1984, 81:5031-5033.
74. Chipot C, Dehez F, Ángyán J, Millot C, Orozco M, Luque FJ. Alternative approaches for the calculations of induction energies: characterization, effectiveness, and pitfalls. J Phys Chem A 2001, 105:11505-11514.
75. Soteras I, Curutchet C, Bidon-Chanal A, Dehez F, Angyán JG, Orozco M, Chipot C, Luque FJ. Derivation of distributed models of atomic polarizability for molecular simulations. J Chem Theor Comput 2007, 3:1901-1913.
76. Williams GJ, Stone AJ. Distributed dispersion: a new approach. J Chem Phys 2003, 119:4620-4628.
77. Thole BT. Molecular polarizabilities calculated with a modified dipole interaction. Chem Phys 1981, 59:341-350.
78. Tang KT, Toennies JP. An improved model for the Van Der Waals potential based on universal damping functions for the dispersion coefficients. J Chem Phys 1984, 80:3726-3741.
79. Jensen L, Astrand P-O, Osted A, Kongsted J, Mikkelsen KV. Polarizability of molecular clusters as calculated by a dipole interaction model. J Chem Phys 2002, 116:4001-4010.
80. Masia M, Probst M, Rey R. On the performance of molecular polarization methods. II. Water and carbon tetrachloride close to a cation. J Chem Phys 2005, 123:164505-164518.
81. Elking D, Darden T, Woods RJ. Gaussian induced dipole polarization model. J Comput Chem 2007, 28:1261-1274.
82. Dehez F, Angyán JG, Soteras I, Luque FJ, Schulten K, Chipot C. Modeling induction phenomena in intermolecular interactions with an ab initio force field. J Chem Theor Comput 2007, 3:1914-1926.
83. Archambault F, Chipot C, Soteras I, Luque FJ, Schulten K, Dehez F. Polarizable intermolecular potential for water and benzene interacting with halide and metal ions. J Chem Theor Comput 2009, 5:3022-3031.
84. Bukowski R, Szalewicz K, Groenenboom GC, van der Avoird A. Predictions of the properties of water from first principles. Science 2007, 315:1249-1252.
85. Misquitta AJ, Stone AJ. Accurate induction energies for small organic molecules: 1. Theory. J Chem Theor Comput 2008, 4:7-18.
86. Misquitta AJ, Stone AJ, Price SL. Accurate induction energies for small organic molecules. 2. Development and testing of distributed polarizability models against SAPT(DFT) energies. J Chem Theor Comput 2008, 4:19-32.
87. Halgren TA, Damm W. Polarizable force fields. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2001, 11:236-242.
88. Lopes PEM, Roux B, MacKerell AD Jr. Molecular modeling and dynamics studies with explicit inclusion of electronic polarizability: theory and applications. Theor Chem Acc 2009, 124:11-28.
89. Kamisnki GA, Stern HA, Berne BJ, Friesner RA, Cao YX, Murphy RB, Zhou R, Halgren TA. Development of a polarizable force field for proteins via ab initio quantum chemistry: first generation model and gas phase tests. J Comput Chem 2002, 23:1515-1531.
90. Patel S, MacKerell AD Jr, Brooks CL III. CHARMM fluctuating charge force field for proteins: II. Protein/solvent properties from molecular dynamics simulations using a nonadditive electrostatic model. J Comput Chem 2004, 25:1504-1514.