Reining in auditors: On the dynamics of power surrounding an " innovation" in the regulatory space

Accounting, Organizations and Society

Volumn 36, Issue 7, 2011, Pages 456-476

  Malsch, Bertrand ^a   Gendron, Yves ^b  

^a HEC MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054121349     PISSN: 03613682     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2011.06.001     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. AccountancyAge (2008, December 8). Auditors defend themselves after audit flaws made public. Accessed 20.04.10. http://www.accountancyage.com/accountancyage/news/2232195/aiu-reports-lift-lid-auditors.
2. Alvesson M., Willmott H. Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies 2002, 39(5):619-644.
3. Arnold P.J., Sikka P. Globalization and the state-profession relationship: The case of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2001, 26(6):475-499.
4. Audit Inspection Unit (AIU) (2007). 2006/7 Audit quality inspections public report. Accessed 15.07.08. http://www.frc.org.uk/pob/audit/reports.cfm.
5. Audit Inspection Unit (AIU) (2009). Public report on the 2008/9 inspection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Accessed April 2010. http://www.frc.org.uk/pob/audit/reports.cfm.
6. Bachrach P., Baratz M.S. The two faces of power. American Political Science Review 1962, 56:947-952.
7. Baron J. Judgment misguided: Intuition and error in public decision making 1988, Oxford University Press, New York.
8. Barthes R. Mythologies 1972, Hill and Wang, New York.
9. Bolkenstein F. Audit of company accounts - 10 priorities to improve quality and protect investors 2003, European Commission Press Release, (Reference: IP/03/715).
10. Bromwich M., Hopwood A. Introduction. Auditing research: Issues and opportunities 1982, Haskins & Sells, London. A.G. Hopwood, M. Bromwich, J. Shaw (Eds.).
11. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (2003). Report from the Chair. CPAB 2003 annual report.
12. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (2005). Second public report on quality inspections of public accounting firms.
13. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (2006, June). Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) rules. Accessed 04.12.10. http://www.cpab-ccrc.ca/EN/Pages/CPABRules.aspx.
14. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (2007). Fourth public report on inspections of the quality of audits conducted by public accounting firms.
15. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (2008a). Fifth public report: Inspections of the quality of audits conducted by public accounting firms.
16. Canadian Public Accountability Board (CPAB) (2008b, May). CPAB - Five years on. PowerPoint presentation made by Keith Boocock in the context of the 2008 Canadian Academic Accounting Association Conference.
17. Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA) (2004). Response to comments on National Instrument 52-108. Accessed 13.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/SecuritiesLaw_rule_20040116_52-108_note-ni.jsp.
18. Carpenter, J. S. (2003). CGA Alberta's response to proposed National Instrument 52-108. Accessed 21.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/24259.htm.
19. Clegg S. Frameworks of power 1989, Sage Publications, London.
20. Clegg S. The bounds of rationality: Power/history/imagination. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2006, 17(7):847-863.
21. Cooper D.J., Robson K. Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization. Accounting Organizations and Society 2006, 31(4/5):415-444.
22. Covaleski M.A., Dirsmith M.W., Heian J.B., Samuel S. The calculated and the avowed: Techniques of discipline and struggles over identity in Big Six public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 1998, 43(2):293-327.
23. Dahl R.A. Who governs? Democracy and power in an American city 1961, Yale University Press, Yale.
24. DeFond M.L. How should the auditors be audited? Comparing the PCAOB Inspections with the AICPA Peer Reviews. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2009, 49(1/2):104-108.
25. Dent M., Whitehead S. Configuring the " new" professional. Managing professional identities: Knowledge, performativity and the " new" professional 2002, 1-16. Routledge, New York. M. Dent, S. Whitehead (Eds.).
26. DiMaggio P.J., Powell W.W. The iron cage revisited. Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48(2):147-160.
27. Djelic M.L., Sahlin K. Governance and its transnational dynamics: Towards a reordering of our world. Accounting, organizations, & institutions 2009, 175-204. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. C. Chapman, D.J. Cooper, P.B. Miller (Eds.).
28. Ellwood S., Newberry S. Public sector accrual accounting: Institutionalising neo-liberal principles. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2007, 20(4):549-573.
29. Ernst & Young (2003). Ernst & Young's response to proposed National Instrument 52-108. Accessed 21.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/24259.htm.
30. European Commission (2004, March 16). Audit of company accounts: Commission proposes directive to combat fraud and malpractice. Press release. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/04/340&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
31. European Commission (2008, May 13). Commission recommendation on external quality assurance for statutory auditors and audit firms auditing public interest entities: Frequently asked questions (IP/08/734). Press release. http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/08/300&format=HTML&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en.
32. Fédération des experts comptables européens (FEE) Europe's accountants ask commission, council of ministers & parliament to address weaknesses in proposed EU Audit Directive 2004, Press release, (Reference: PR42).
33. Feldman S. Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology 2003, 24(1):41-74.
34. Flyvbjerg B. Making social science matter: Why social science inquiry has failed and how it can succeed again 2001, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
35. Fogarty T.J. The imagery and reality of peer review in the U.S.: Insights from institutional theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1996, 21(2/3):243-267.
36. Foucault M. The history of sexuality 1981, Vol. 1. Penguin, London.
37. Foucault M. The subject and power. Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics 1983, 208-226. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd ed. H.L. Dreyfus, P. Rabinow (Eds.).
38. Foucault M. Disciplinary power and subjection. Power 1986, 229-242. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, England. S. Lukes (Ed.).
39. Frumkin P., Galaskiewicz J. Institutional isomorphism and public sector organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2004, 14(3):283-307.
40. Gendron Y. On the role of the organization in auditors' client-acceptance decisions. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2002, 27(7):659-684.
41. Gendron Y., Barrett M. Professionalization in action: Accountants' attempt at building a network of support for the WebTrust seal of assurance. Contemporary Accounting Research 2004, 21(3):563-602.
42. Gendron Y., Spira L.F. What went wrong? The downfall of Arthur Andersen and the construction of controllability boundaries surrounding financial auditing. Contemporary Accounting Research 2009, 26(4):987-1027.
43. Gendron Y., Spira L.F. Identity narratives under threat: A study of former members of Arthur Andersen. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2010, 35(3):275-300.
44. Gordon R., Kornberger M., Clegg S.R. Power, rationality and legitimacy in public organizations. Public Administration 2009, 87(1):15-34.
45. Guénin-Paracini H., Gendron Y. Auditors as modern pharmakoi: Legitimacy paradoxes and the production of economic order. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2010, 21(2):134-158.
46. Hall S. The West and the rest. Formations of modernity 1992, 275-320. Polity Press, Cambridge, England. S. Hall, B. Gieben (Eds.).
47. Hall S. The work of representation. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices 1997, 13-74. Open University Press, London, England. S. Hall (Ed.).
48. Hancher L., Moran M. Organizing regulatory space. Capitalism, culture and regulation 1989, Claredon Press, Oxford. L. Hancher, M. Moran (Eds.).
49. Hanlon G. The commercialisation of accounting: Flexible accumulation and the transformation of the service class 1994, Macmillan, London, England.
50. Hardy C., Clegg S.R. Some dare call it power. Handbook of organization studies 2006, Sage Publications, London, England. 2nd ed. S.R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, W.R. Nord (Eds.).
51. Haut Conseil du Commissariat aux comptes (H3C) (2008). Rapport 2008 du Haut Conseil. Accessed April 2010. http://www.h3c.org/fiches/rapport_2008.htm.
52. Haynes K. Linking narrative and identity construction: Using autobiography in accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2006, 17(4):399-418.
53. Hayward C., Lukes S. Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency: A dialogue. Journal of Power 2008, 1(1):5-20.
54. Hazgui M., Manita R., Pochet C. Les défaillances affectant la qualité de l'audit: Une étude qualitative sur le marché français. Working paper 2010, Rouen Business School.
55. Hession, G. (2003). Teachers' response to proposed National Instrument 52-108. Accessed 21.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/24259.htm.
56. Hopwood A.G. Some reflections on " the harmonization of accounting within EU" European Accounting Review 1994, 3(2):241-253.
57. Humphrey C. Auditing research: A review across the disciplinary divide. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2008, 21(2):170-203.
58. Humphrey, C., Kokkali, S., & Samsonova, A. (2010). Re-thinking auditor liability: The case of the European Union's regulatory reform. In Paper presented at the 12th annual alternative accounts conference and workshop, Toronto.
59. Humphrey C., Loft A., Woods M. The global audit profession and the international financial architecture: Understanding regulatory relationships at a time of financial crisis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34(6/7):810-825.
60. Humphrey C., Moizer P. From techniques to ideologies: An alternative perspective on the audit function. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 1990, 1(3):217-238.
61. Humphrey C., Moizer P. Understanding regulation in its global context. Auditing, trust and governance: Developing regulation in Europe 2008, 262-278. Routledge, London, England. R. Quick, S. Turley, M. Wilekens (Eds.).
62. Knorr Cetina K. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge 1999, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
63. Latshaw C.A. Fraudulent financial reporting: The government and accounting profession react. Review of Business 2003, 24(2):13-15.
64. Lennox C., Pittman J. Auditing the auditors: Evidence on the recent reforms to the external monitoring of audit firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics 2009, 49(1/2):84-103.
65. Le Pan, N. (2008). More than another speech on accounting. Accessed 21.01.10. http://www.cpab-ccrc.ca/EN/Pages/speechesPresentations.aspx.
66. Loft A., Humphrey C., Turley S. In pursuit of global regulation: Changing governance structures at the international federation of accountants (IFAC). Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2006, 19(3):428-451.
67. Lukes S. Power: A radical view 1974, Macmillan, London.
68. Lukes S. Power: A radical view 2005, Palgrave, Basingstoke. 2nd ed.
69. MacDonald L.D., Richardson A.J. Identity, appropriateness and the construction of regulatory space: The formation of the Public Accountant's Council of Ontario. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2004, 29(5/6):489-524.
70. Malsch B. Accounting firms as political agents of depoliticization: The case of corporate social responsibility. Working paper 2010, Université Laval.
71. McCreevy, C. (2008, December 10). Speech at the European Contact Group/EGIAN dinner (Reference: SPEECH/08/692).
72. McNair C.J. Proper compromises: The management control dilemma in public accounting and its impact on auditor behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1991, 16(7):635-653.
73. Mennicken A. Connecting worlds: The translation of international auditing standards into post-Soviet audit practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2008, 33(4/5):384-414.
74. Moore D., Tetlock P., Tanlu L., Bazerman M. Conflicts of interest and the case of auditor independence: Moral seduction and strategic issue cycling. Academy of Management Review 2006, 31(1):1-20.
75. Neu D., Cooper D.J., Everett J. Critical accounting interventions. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 2001, 12(6):735-762.
76. Ontario Securities Commission (2003). Notice and request for comments: Proposed multilateral instrument 52-108. Accessed 05.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/SecuritiesLaw_rule_20030627_52-108_notice-roc.jsp.
77. Pritchard, A. C., & Puri, P. (2006). The regulation of public auditing in Canada and the United States: Self-regulation or government regulation? Fraser Institute Digital Publication.
78. Richardson A.J. Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2009, 34(5):571-588.
79. Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogenity. Global modernities 1995, 25-44. Sage Publications, London, England. M. Featherstone, S. Lasch, R. Robertson (Eds.).
80. Rose N., Miller P. Political power beyond the State: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology 1992, 43(2):173-205.
81. Sarbanes-Oxley Act (2002). US Congress, Senate H.R. 3763.
82. Schön D.A. The reflective practitioner: How practitioners think in action 1983, Basic Books, USA.
83. Sikka P., Willmott H. The power of " independence": Defending and extending the jurisdiction of accounting in the United Kingdom. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1995, 20(6):547-581.
84. Sikka P., Willmott H. On the commercialization of accounting thesis: A review essay. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1997, 22(8):831-842.
85. Sikka P., Willmott H., Puxty T. The mountains are still there: Accounting academics and the bearings of intellectuals. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 1995, 8(3):113-140.
86. Spira L., Page M. Risk management: The reinvention of internal control and the changing role of internal audit. Accounting, Audit & Accountability Journal 2003, 16(4):640-661.
87. Stymiest, B. (2003). TSX response to proposed National Instrument 52-108. Accessed 21.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/24259.htm.
88. Suddaby R., Cooper D.J., Greenwood R. Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change. Accounting, Organizations and Society 2007, 32(4/5):333-362.
89. Sweeney B., Pierce B. Management control in audit firms: A qualitative examination. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 2004, 17(5):779-812.
90. The Bottom Line (2004a, mid-October). First oversight report delivers mild rebuke, pp. 1-2.
91. The Bottom Line (2004b, mid-October). Oversight Board called uncritical, p. 2.
92. The Bottom Line (2006, October). Changing the guard does not alter the mission, p. 5.
93. Thesberg, A. (2003). KPMG's response to proposed National Instrument 52-108. Accessed 21.01.10. http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/en/24259.htm.
94. Thiessen, G. (2005). Remarks by Gordon Thiessen, Chairman of the Canadian Public Accountability Board, to the IFAC Ethics Committee. Accessed 21.01.0. http://www.cpab-ccrc.ca/EN/Pages/speechesPresentations.aspx.
95. Vogler C. Money in the household: Some underlying issues of power. The Sociological Review 1998, 46(4):687-713.
96. Woodward K. Concepts of identity and difference. Identity and difference 1997, 7-61. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California. K. Woodward (Ed.).
97. Wyatt A.R. Accounting professionalism: They just don't get it!. Accounting Horizons 2004, 18(1):45-53.
98. Young J.J. Outlining regulatory space: Agenda items and the FASB. Accounting, Organizations and Society 1994, 19(1):83-109.