Visual enterprise network analytics - Visualizing organizational change

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

Volumn 22, Issue , 2011, Pages 59-68

  Windhager, Florian ^a   Zenk, Lukas ^a   Federico, Paolo ^a  

^a DANUBE UNIVERSITY KREMS   (Austria)

Author keywords

Change management; Network visualization; Social network analysis; Visual analytics

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054115205     PISSN: 18770428     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.07.056     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (63)

1. Aigner, W., Miksch, S., Müller, W., Schumann, H., & Tominski, C. (2008). Visual Methods for Analyzing Time-Oriented Data. Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics. 14(1), 47-60.
2. Alvarez-Hamelin, I., Dall'Asta, L., Barrat, A., & Vespignani, A. (2006). LaNet-vi in a Nutshell. Technical Report. Indiana University School of Informatics.
3. Andrews, K., Wohlfahrt, M., & Wurzinger, G. (2009). Visual Graph Comparison. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference Information Visualization 2009 (pp. 62-67) IEEE Press.
4. Baldonado, M., Woodruff, A., & Kuchinsky, A. (2000). Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces (pp. 110-119). New York: ACM Press.
5. Bender-deMoll, S., & McFarland, D. A. (2006). The art and science of Dynamic Network Visualization. Journal of Social Structure, 7 (2).
6. Blickle, T., & Heß, H. (2006). From Process Efficiency to Organizational Performance. In A.W. Scheer, H. Kruppke, W. Jost, H. Kindermann (eds.) Yearbook Business Process Excellence 2006/2007, (pp. 269-281). Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.
7. Borgatti, S. P. (2003). The state of organizational social network research today. Department of Organization Studies, Boston University, manuscript.
8. Brandes, U., & Wagner, D. (1997). A Bayesian paradigm for dynamic graph layout. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Graph Drawing GD'97. Springer LNCS 1353 (pp. 236-247).
9. Brandes, U. (1999). Layout of Graph Visualizations, Doctoral Thesis, University Konstanz.
10. Breiger, R., Carley, K., & Pattison, P. (Eds.) (2003). Dynamic Social Network Modeling and Analysis. Washington D.C.: The National Academies Press.
11. Carpendale, M. S. T., Cowperthwaite, D. J., Fracchia, F. D., & Shermer, T. (1996) Graph Folding: Extending Detail and Context Viewing into a Tool for Subgraph Comparison. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Graph Drawing '96, (pp. 127-139). Berlin Germany Springer.
12. Coleman, M. K. (1993). Aesthetics-based Graph Layout for Human Consumption, Master Thesis, University of California, LA.
13. Cook, K., Earnshaw, R., & Stasko, J. (2007). Guest Editors' Introduction: Discovering the Unexpected, Computer Graphics and Applications, 27(5) 15-19.
14. Cross, R., Borgatti, S., & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25-46.
15. Cross, R. L., & Thomas, R. J. (2009). Driving results through social networks: how top organizations leverage networks for performance and growth. John Wiley and Sons.
16. Davidson, R., & Harel, D. (1996). Drawing graphs nicely using simulated annealing, ACM Transactions on Graphics, 15(4), 301-331.
17. De Nooy, W. (2008). Signs over Time: Statistical and Visual Analysis of a Longitudinal Signed Network. Journal of Social Structure, 9(1).
18. Di Battista, G., Eades, P., Tamassia, R., & Tollis, I. G. (1994). Algorithms for drawing graphs: an annotated bibliography, Computational Geometry: Theory and Application, 4(5), 235-282.
19. Diehl, S., & Görg, C. (2002). Graphs: They Are Changing, Revised Papers From the 10th International Symposium on Graph Drawing, 2528, 23-30.
20. Diehl, S., Görg, C., & Kerren, A. (2001). Preserving the mental map using Foresighted Layout. In Proceedings of Joint Eurographics - IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization VisSym'01, 175-184.
21. Doreian, P., & Snijders, T. (Eds.) (2010). Dynamics of Social Networks (Special Issue). Social Networks, 32(1).
22. Dwyer, T. (2005). Two-and-a-Half-Dimensional Visualization of Relational Networks, Master Thesis, Sidney, Australia: University of Sidney.
23. Eades, P., Lai, W., Misue, K., & Sugiyama, K. (1991). Preserving the mental map of a diagram. In Proceedings of COMPUGRAPHICS '91, (pp. 34-43).
24. Eades, P., & Feng, Q. W. (1997). Multilevel Visualization of clustered graphs. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Graph Drawing, (pp. 101- 112). London UK Springer
25. London, UK: Springer. Friederich, C., & Houle, M. E. (2001). Graph Drawing in Motion II. In Proceedings of the 9th international Symposium on Graph Drawing GD01, 220-231.
26. Fruchterman, T. M. J., & Reingold, E. M. (1991). Graph drawing by forcedirected placement. Software - Practice & Experience, 21(11), 1129-1164.
27. Gansner, E. R., Koren, Y., & North, S. (2005). Graph Drawing by Stress Majorization. In: Pach, J. (ed.) GD 2004. LNCS, 3383, (pp. 239 - 250). Berlin Springer
28. Berlin: Springer. Groh, G., Hanstein, H., & Wörndl, W. (2009). Interactively Visualizing Dynamic Social Networks with DySon. manuscript.
29. Heer, J., & Boyd, D. (2005). Vizster: Visualizing online social networks. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 5, (pp. 32-39) Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.
30. Henry, N., Fekete, J.-D., & McGuffin, M. J. (2007). NodeTrix: A Hybrid Visualization of Social Networks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 1302-1309.
31. Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7-15.
32. Keim, D. A., Mansmann, F., Schneidewind, J., & Ziegler, H. (2006). Challenges in Visual Data Analysis. In Proceedings of Information Visualization (IV 2006), (pp. 9-16) London, UK: IEEE Press.
33. Kimelman, D., Leban, B., Roth, T., & Zernik, D. (1995). Reduction of Visual Complexity in Dynamic Graphs. In Proceedings of the DIMACS International Workshop on Graph Drawing (pp. 218-225). London, UK: Springer.
34. Kohlbacher, M. (2010). The effects of process orientation: a literature review. Business Process Management Journal, 16(1), 135-152.
35. Krempel, L. (2005). Visualisierung komplexer Strukturen. Grundlagen der Darstellung mehrdimensionaler Netzwerke. Frankfurt, Germany: Campus.
36. Kumar, G., & Garland, M. (2006). Visual exploration of complex time-varying graphs, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5), 805-812.
37. Lee, Y.-Y., Lin, C.-C., & Yen, H.-C. (2006). Mental map preserving graph drawing using simulated annealing. In Proceedings of the 2006 Asia- Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization. (pp. 179-188) Darlinghurst, Australia: Australian Computer Society.
38. Leydesdorff, L., & Schank, T. (2008). Dynamic animations of journal maps: Indicators of structural changes and interdisciplinary developments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59. 1810-1818.
39. Madison, D. (2005). Process Mapping, Process Improvement and Process Management. Chico, CA: Paton Press.
40. Matthews, G., & Roze, M. (1997). Worm Plots, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 17(6), 17-20.
41. McGrath, C. J., & Blythe, J. (2004). Do you see what I want you to see? The effects of motion and spatial layout on viewers' perceptions of graph structure, Journal of Social Structure, 5(2).
42. McGrath, C., Krackhardt, D., & Blythe, J. (2003). Visualizing Complexity in Networks: Seeing both the Forest and the Trees, Connections, 25(1), 37-47.
43. Melançon, G., & Herman, I. (1998). Circular Drawings of Rooted Trees, Technical Report, Amsterdam, NL: Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science.
44. Mirkin, B. (1996). Mathematical Classification and Clustering, Alphen aan den Rijn, NL: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
45. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
46. Moody, J., McFarland, D., & Bender-deMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1206-1241.
47. Namata, G. M., Staats, B., Getoor, L., & Shneiderman, B. (2007). A dual-view approach to interactive network visualization. In Proceedings of the sixteenth ACM conference on Conference on information and knowledge management, (pp. 9393-942). New York: ACM Press.
48. North, S. C. (2006). Incremental layout in DynaDAG. Lectures Notes in Computer Sciences, 1027, 409-418.
49. Nowell, L., Hetzler, E., & Tanasse, T. (2001). Change Blindness in Information Visualization: A Case Study. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2001 (pp. 15-22). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Press.
50. Pohl, M., Reitz, F., & Birke, P. (2008). As time goes by: integrated visualization and analysis of dynamic networks. In Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces, (pp. 372-375), New York: ACM Press.
51. Purchase, H. C. (1998). Performance of Layout Algorithms: Comprehension, not Computation. Journal of Visual Language & Computing, 9(6), 647-657.
52. Queli, E., Wiechert, W., & Freisleben, B. (2005). Visual Exploration of Time-Varying Matrices. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Information Visualization, (pp. 889-895). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
53. Robertson, G. G., Mackinlay, J. D., & Card, S. K. (1991). Cone trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems: Reaching through technology. New York: ACM Press.
54. Schlechtweg, S., Schulze-Wollgast, P., & Schumann, H. (2004). Interactive treemaps with detail on demand to support information search in document. In Proceedings of the Eurographics/IEEE TCVG Visualization Symposium, (pp. 121-128). Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland: Eurographics Association.
55. Shneiderman, B. (1996). The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages (pp. 336-343). Washington, D.C.: IEEE Computer Society.
56. Shneiderman, B., & Aris, A. (2006). Network Visualization by Semantic Substrates. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5), 733-740.
57. Spence, R. (2006). Information visualization - Design for Interaction, (2nd ed.) Harlow, UK: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
58. Stasko, J. T., & Zhang, E. (2000). Focus+Context Display and Navigation Techniques for Enhancing Radial, Space-filling Hierarchy Visualizations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 57, Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
59. Thomas, J. J., & Cook, K. A. (2005). Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics. Los Alamitos, CA.: IEEE Computer Science.
60. Tominski, C., & Abello, J. (2006). Fisheye Treeviews and Lenses for Graph Visualization. Proceedings. IV'06, 17-24.
61. Tufte, E. R. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
62. Turban, E., Sharda, R., & Delen, D. (2010). Decision Support and Business Intelligence Systems (9th ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.
63. Wattenberg, M. (2002). Arc diagrams: Visualizing structure in strings. In Proceedings on the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, 2002 (pp. 110-116) Boston, MA: IEEE Press.