Graph folding: Extending detail and context viewing into a tool for subgraph comparisons

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1027, Issue , 1996, Pages 127-139

  Sheelagh, M ^a   Carpendale, T ^a   Cowperthwaite, David J ^a   Fracchia, F David ^a   Shermer, Thomas ^a  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

3D interactions; Distortion viewing; Graph layout; Information visualization; Interface design

Indexed keywords

DRAWING (GRAPHICS); INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

3D INTERACTIONS; DISTORTION VIEWING; GRAPH LAYOUT; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; INTERFACE DESIGNS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84947936428     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0021797     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. M. S. T. Carpendale, D. J. Cowperthwaite, and F. D. Fracchia. 3-dimensional pliable surfaces: For effective presentation of visual information. In toappear: UIST: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, 1995.
2. B. D. Fisher and Z. W. Pylyshyn. The cognitive architecture of bimodal event perception: A commentary and addendum to Radeau. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive/Current Psychology of Cognition, 13(l):92-96, Feb. 1994.
3. G. W. Furnas. Generalized fisheye views. In Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI'86 Conference Proceedings, pages 16-23, 1986.
4. N. Goodman. Languages of Art; An Approach to a Theory of Symbols. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1968.
5. M. Himsolt. GraphEd: A graphical platform for the implementation of graph algorithms. In Graph Drawing, DIMACS International Workshop, Proceedings, pages 182- 193, 1994.
6. K. Kaugers, J. Reinfelds, and A. Brazma. A simple algorithm for drawing large graphs on small screens. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Graph Drawing, pages 278 - 282, 1995.
7. D. A. Kleffner and V. S. Ramachandran. On the perception of shape from shading. In Perception and Psychophysics, 52(l):18-36, 1992.
8. J. Lamping and R. Rao. Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space. In UIST: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 13 - 14, 1994.
9. J. D. Mackinlay, G. G. Robertson, and S. K. Card. The perspective wall: Detail and context smoothly integrated. In CHI'91 Conference Proceedings, pages 173 - 180, 1991.
10. D. W. Massaro. Speech perception by ear and eye: a paradigm for psychological inquiry. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum Associates, 1987.
11. D. W. Massaro. Attention and perception: An information integration perspective. Special Issue: Action, attention and automaticity. / (In Acta Psychologica), 60(2- 3):211-243, Dec. 1985.
12. K. Misue and K. Sugiyama. Multi-viewpoint perspective display methods: Formulation and application to compound digraphs. In Human Aspects in Computing: design and Use of Interactive Systems and Information Management, pages 834-838. Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991.
13. E. G. Noik. Layout-independent fisheye views of nested graphs. In Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages, pages 336 - 341, 1993.
14. E. G. Noik. A space of presentation emphasis techniques for visualizing graphs. In Graphics Interface '94, pages 225-233, 1994.
15. V. S. Ramachandran. Perception of shape from shading. Nature, 331(14):163 160, 1988.
16. G. Robertson and J. D. Mackinlay. The document lens. In UIST: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 101 - 108, 1993.
17. M. Sarkar and M. H. Brown. Graphical fisheye views. Communications of the ACM, 37(12):73-84, 1994.
18. M. Sarkar, S. Snibbe, O. J. Tversky, and S. P. Reiss. Stretching the rubber sheet: A metaphor for viewing large layouts on small screens. In UIST: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 81 - 91, 1993.
19. E. Tufte. Envisioning Information. Cheshire, Connecticut: Graphics Press, 1990.
20. C. Ware. The foundations of experimental semiotics: a theory of sensory and conventional representation. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 4:91-100, 1993.