A detailed study of the Beddington-DeAngelis predator-prey model

Mathematical Biosciences

Volumn 234, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-16

  Haque, Mainul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bifurcation; Colour noise; Intra species competition; Predator prey; Stability; White noise

Indexed keywords

BEDDINGTON-DEANGELIS PREDATOR-PREY MODEL; BIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; COLOUR NOISE; ENVIRONMENTAL STOCHASTICITY; INTRA-SPECIES COMPETITION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL RESULTS; PREDATOR - PREY SYSTEM; PREDATOR POPULATIONS; PREDATOR-PREY; PREDATOR-PREY MODELS; STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENT; TRANSCRITICAL;

COMPETITION; ECOLOGY; HOPF BIFURCATION; MAMMALS; POPULATION STATISTICS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; WHITE NOISE;

STOCHASTIC MODELS;

BIFURCATION; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL MODEL; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; STOCHASTICITY; WHITE NOISE;

ARTICLE; BEDDINGTON DEANGELIS PREDATOR PREY MODEL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOGDANOV TAKENS ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOSYSTEM; HOPF ANDRONOV ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRASPECIFIC COMPETITION; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NONHUMAN; SADDLE NODE ANALYSIS; STABILITY AND BIFURCATION ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC MODEL; TRANSCRITICAL ANALYSIS; WHITE NOISE;

ANIMALS; ARVICOLINAE; FOOD CHAIN; MINK; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; POPULATION DENSITY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR;

EID: 80054097969     PISSN: 00255564     EISSN: 18793134     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Abrams P. The fallacies of ratio-dependent predation. Ecology 1994, 1842.
2. Abrams P., Walters C. Invulnerable prey and the statics and dynamics of predator-prey interactions. Ecology 1996, 77:1125.
3. Afanasiev V., Kolmanovskii V., Nosov V. Mathematical Theory of Control Systems Design 1996, Kluwer Academic, Boston.
4. Akcakaya H., Arditi R., Ginzburg L. Ratio-dependent predation: an abstraction that works. Ecology 1995, 76(3):995.
5. Alonso D., Bartumeus F., Catalan J. Mutual interference between predators can give rise to Turing spatial patterns. Ecology 2002, 83(1):28.
6. Arditi R., Ginzburg L. Coupling in predator-prey dynamics: ratio-dependence. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1989, 139(3):311.
7. Bazykin A., Khibnik A., Krauskopf B. Nonlinear Dynamics of Interacting Populations 1998, World Scientific.
8. Beddington J. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. The Journal of Animal Ecology 1975, 331.
9. Berezovskaya F., Karev G., Arditi R. Parametric analysis of the ratio-dependent predator-prey model. Journal of Mathematical Biology 2001, 43(3):221.
10. Cantrell R., Cosner C. On the dynamics of predator-prey models with the Beddington-DeAngelis functional response. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2001, 257(1):206.
11. Cosner C., DeAngelis D., Ault J., Olson D. Effects of spatial grouping on the functional response of predators. Theoretical Population Biology 1999, 56(1):65.
12. DeAngelis D., Goldstein R., O'Neill R. A model for tropic interaction. Ecology 1975, 881.
13. Dimitrov D., Kojouharov H. Complete mathematical analysis of predator-prey models with linear prey growth and Beddington-DeAngelis functional response. Applied Mathematics and Computation 2005, 162(2):523.
14. Freedman H. Deterministic Mathematical Models in Population Ecology 1980, Marcel Dekker, New York.
15. Fussmann [15] G.F., Ellner S.P., Shertzer K.W., Hairston N.G. Crossing the Hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science 2000, 290(5495):1358-1360.
16. Gard T., Hallam T. Persistence in food webs-Lotka-Volterra food chains. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 1979, 41(6):877.
17. Gatto M. Some remarks of models of plankton densities in lake. American Naturalist 1991, 137(3):264.
18. Gause G. Experimental demonstration of Volterra's periodic oscillations in the numbers of animals. Journal of Experimental Biology 1935, 12(1):44.
19. Getz W. Population dynamics: a unified approach. Journal of Theoretical Biology 1984, 108:623.
20. Gikhman I., Skorokhod A. The Theory of Stochastic Processes 2004, Springer.
21. Gutierrez A. Physiological basis of ratio-dependent predator-prey theory: the metabolic pool model as a paradigm. Ecology 1992, 1552.
22. Haque M. Ratio-dependent predator-prey models of interacting populations. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 2009, 71(2):430.
23. Hassard B., Kazarinoff N., Wan Y. Theory and Applications of Hopf Bifurcation 1981, Cambridge University Press.
24. Hsu S., Hwang T., Kuang Y. Global analysis of the Michaelis-Menten-type ratio-dependent predator-prey system. Journal of Mathematical Biology 2001, 42(6):489.
25. Hsu S., Hwang T., Kuang Y. Rich dynamics of a ratio-dependent one-prey two-predators model. Journal of Mathematical Biology 2001, 43(5):377.
26. Huffaker C., Herman S., Shea K. Experimental studies on predation Complex dispersion and levels of food in an acarine predator-prey interaction 1963, Univ. of Calif.
27. Hwang T. Global analysis of the predator-prey system with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 2003, 281(1):395.
28. Jost C., Arditi R. Identifying predator-prey processes from time-series. Theoretical Population Biology 2000, 57(4):325.
29. Kirk K. Enrichment can stabilize population dynamics: autotoxins and density dependence. Ecology 1998, 79(7):2456.
30. Kloeden P., Platen E. Numerical Solution of Stochastic Differential Equations 1992, Springer.
31. Kuang Y. Rich dynamics of Gause-type ratio-dependent predator-prey system. The Fields Institute Communications 1999, 21:325.
32. Kuznetsov Y. Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory 1998, Springer.
33. Leibold M. Resource edibility and the effects of predators and productivity on the outcome of trophic interactions. American Naturalist 1989, 134(6):922.
34. Luckinbill L. Coexistence in laboratory populations of Paramecium aurelia and its predator Didinium nasutum. Ecology 1973, 1320.
35. May R. Stability and complexity in model ecosystems with a new introduction by the author 1973, Princeton University Press.
36. Maynard Smith J. Models in Ecology 1974, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Persson A., Hansson L., Bronmark C., Lundberg P., Pettersson L., Greenberg L., Nilsson P., Nystrom P., Romare P., Tranvik L. Effects of enrichment on simple aquatic food webs. The American Naturalist 2001, 157(6):654.
38. E.C. Pielou, An introduction to mathematical ecology, John Wiley and Sons, 1969.
39. Renshaw E. Modelling Biological Populations in Space and Time 1991, Cambridge University Press.
40. Schaffer W., Rosenzweig M. Homage to the red queen. I. Coevolution of predators and their victims. Theoretical Population Biology 1978, 14:135.
41. Skalski G., Gilliam J. Functional responses with predator interference: viable alternatives to the Holling type II model. Ecology 2001, 82(11):3083.
42. Sotomayor J. Generic bifurcations of dynamical systems. Dynamical Systems 1973, 549.
43. Tanner J. The stability and the intrinsic growth rates of prey and predator populations. Ecology 1975, 56:855.
44. Veilleux B. An analysis of the predatory interaction between Paramecium and Didinium. The Journal of Animal Ecology 1979, 787.
45. C. Walters, E. Krause, W. Neill, T. Northcote, Equilibrium Models for Seasonal Dynamics of Plankton Biomass in Four Oligotrophy Lakes, Journal Canadien des Sciences Halieutiques et Aquatiques 44 1002-1017.