What happens when representations fail to represent? Graduate students' mental models of organic chemistry diagrams

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 293-301

  Strickland, Amanda M ^a   Kraft, Adam ^b   Bhattacharyya, Gautam ^c  

^a MOUNT HOLYOKE COLLEGE   (United States)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acids; Bases; Diagrams; Electrophiles; Mental models; Nucleophiles; Organic chemistry; Reaction mechanisms; Representational competence; Representations

Indexed keywords

EID: 80054094077     PISSN: None     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/c0rp90009e     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Anslyn E. and Dougherty D., (2006), Modern physical organic chemistry, University Science Books: Sausalito, CA.
2. Bhattacharyya G., (2006), Practitioner development in organic chemistry: how graduate students conceptualize organic acids, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac., 7, 240-247.
3. Bhattacharyya G., (2008), Who am I? What am I doing here? Professional identity and the epistemic development of organic chemists, Chem. Educ. Res. Prac., 9, 84-92.
4. Bhattacharyya G. and Bodner G. M., (2005), "It gets me to the product": how students propose organic mechanisms, J. Chem. Educ., 82, 1402-1407.
5. Bodner G. M. and Domin D., (2000), The role of representations in problem solving in chemistry, Univ. Chem. Educ., 4, 24-30.
6. Bowen C., (1990), Representational systems used by graduate students while problem solving in organic synthesis, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 27, 351-370.
7. Bower G. H. and Morrow D. G., (1990), Mental models in narrative comprehension, Science, 247, 44-48.
8. th Ed., Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ.
9. Chandrasekaran, B., Glasgow J. and Narayanan N., eds., (1995), Diagrammatic reasoning: cognitive and computational perspectives, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA.
10. Coll R. and Treagust D., (2002), Exploring tertiary students' understanding of covalent bonding, Res. Sci. Tech. Educ., 20, 241- 267.
11. Coll R. and Treagust D., (2003), Investigation of secondary school, undergraduate, and graduate learners' mental models of ionic bonding, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 40, 464-486.
12. Eberlein T., Kampmeier J., Minderhout V., Moog, R. Platt T., Varma-Nelson P., and White H., (2008), Pedagogies of engagement in science: a comparison of PBL, POGIL, and PLTL, Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ., 36, 262-273.
13. Ferguson R. L., (2003), Investigating chemistry students' understanding of the arrow-pushing formalism, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN.
14. Gilbert J. K., (1997), Exploring models and modeling in science education and technology education, The University of Reading Press: Reading, England.
15. Goldish D., (1988), Let's talk about the organic chemistry course, J. Chem. Educ., 65, 603-604.
16. Greca I. and Moreira M., (2000), Mental models, conceptual models, and modeling, Int. J. Sci. Educ., 22, 1-11.
17. Greeno J. and Hall R., (1997), Practicing representation: learning with and about representational forms, Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361-367.
18. Heiser J. and Tversky B., (2006), Arrows in comprehending and producing mechanical diagrams, Cognitive Sci., 30, 581-592.
19. Hsu Y., (2006), The effects of metaphors on novice and expert learners' performance and mental-model development, Interact. Comput., 18, 770-792.
20. Kozma R., (2003), The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social affordances for science and understanding, Learn. Instr., 13, 205-226.
21. Kozma R., Chin E., Russell J. and Marx N., (2000), The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning, J. Learn. Sci., 9, 105-143.
22. Kozma R. and Russell J., (1997), Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena, J. Res. Sci. Teach., 34, 949-968.
23. Kraft A., Strickland A. M. and Bhattacharyya G., (2010), Reasonable reasoning: multi-variate problem solving in organic chemistry, Submitted for publication to Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 11, 281-292.
24. Kürti L. and Czakó B., (2005), Strategic applications of named reactions in organic synthesis, Elsevier: London.
25. Lesh R. and Doerr H. M., (2003), Beyond constructivism: models and modeling perspectives on mathematics problem solving, learning, and teaching, Lawrence Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ.
26. rd ed., Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
27. Robertson S., (2001), Problem solving, Psychology Press: Essex, UK.
28. Schnotz W. and Preub A., (1997), Task-dependent construction of mental models as a basis for conceptual change, Eur. J. Psych. Educ., 12, 185-211.
29. Schwartz D. L., (1995), Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: an effect of visual realism, Mem. Cog., 23, 709-722.
30. Senge P., (1994), The fifth discipline fieldbook, Doubleday: New York.
31. Stieff M., (2007), Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science, Learn. Instruc., 17, 219-234.
32. Zhang J., (1997), The nature of external representations in problem solving, Cognitive Sci., 21, 179-217.