Common spatial organization of number and emotional expression: A mental magnitude line

Brain and Cognition

Volumn 77, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 315-323

  Holmes, Kevin J ^a   Lourenco, Stella F ^a  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abstract concepts; Emotion; Magnitude; Number; Parietal cortex; Spatial organization

Indexed keywords

ANGER; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTION; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HAPPINESS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL MAGNITUDE LINE; NEUROSCIENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; POSTERIOR PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SPATIAL ORIENTATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL ORIENTATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; EMOTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; MALE; ORIENTATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 80054056018     PISSN: 02782626     EISSN: 10902147     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Atkinson A.P., Tipples J., Burt D.M., Young A.W. Asymmetric interference between sex and emotion in face perception. Perception & Psychophysics 2005, 67:1199-1213.
2. Bächtold D., Baumüller M., Brugger P. Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:731-735.
3. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:617-645.
4. Bisiach E., Vallar G. Unilateral neglect in humans. Handbook of neuropsychology 2000, 459-502. Elsevier, Amsterdam, vol. 1. 2nd ed. F. Boller, J. Grafman, G. Rizzolatti (Eds.).
5. Bradley M.M., Vrana S.R. The startle probe in the study of emotion and emotional disorders. The structure of emotion 1993, 21-50. Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, Toronto. N. Birbaumer, A. Öhman (Eds.).
6. Bueti D., Walsh V. The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 2009, 364:1831-1840.
7. Cantlon J.F., Platt M., Brannon E.M. Beyond the number domain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2009, 13:83-91.
8. Casasanto D. Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2009, 138:351-367.
9. Chiao J.Y., Harada T., Oby E.R., Li Z., Parrish T., Bridge D.J. Neural representations of social status hierarchy in human inferior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:354-363.
10. Cohen Kadosh R., Cohen Kadosh K., Kaas A., Henik A., Goebel R. Notation-dependent and - independent representations of numbers in the parietal lobes. Neuron 2007, 53:307-314.
11. Cohen Kadosh R., Lammertyn J., Izard V. Are numbers special? An overview of chronometric, neuroimaging, developmental and comparative studies of magnitude representation. Progress in Neurobiology 2008, 84:132-147.
12. Dehaene S. Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The "neuronal recycling" hypothesis. From monkey brain to human brain 2005, 133-157. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. S. Dehaene, J.R. Duhamel, M. Hauser, G. Rizzolatti (Eds.).
13. Dehaene S., Bossini S., Giraux P. The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 1993, 122:371-396.
14. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 2007, 56:384-398.
15. Ekman P. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & Emotion 1992, 6:169-200.
16. Fias W., Fischer M.H. Spatial representation of numbers. Handbook of mathematical cognition 2005, 43-54. Psychology Press, New York. J.I.D. Campbell (Ed.).
17. Fias W., Lammertyn J., Reynvoet B., Dupont P., Orban G.A. Parietal representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2003, 15:47-56.
18. Fias W., Lauwereyns J., Lammertyn J. Irrelevant digits affect feature-based attention depending on the overlap of neural circuits. Cognitive Brain Research 2001, 12:415-423.
19. Fischer M.H. The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex 2006, 42:1066-1068.
20. Fischer M.H., Castel A.D., Dodd M.D., Pratt J. Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:555-556.
21. Fischer M.H., Warlop N., Hill R.L., Fias W. Oculomotor bias induced by number perception. Experimental Psychology 2004, 51:91-97.
22. Fitousi D., Shaki S., Algom D. The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 2009, 71:143-155.
23. Gallistel C.R. Mental magnitudes. Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought 2011, 3-12. Elsevier, London. S. Dehaene, E.M. Brannon (Eds.).
24. Gallistel C.R., Gelman R. Non-verbal numerical cognition: From reals to integers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2000, 4:59-65.
25. Garner W.R. The processing of information and structure 1974, Erlbaum, Potomac, MD.
26. Spatial schemas and abstract thought 2001, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. M. Gattis (Ed.).
27. Goldin-Meadow S., Beilock S.L. Action's influence on thought: The case of gesture. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2010, 5:664-674.
28. Hubbard E.M., Piazza M., Pinel P., Dehaene S. Interactions between number and space in parietal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:435-448.
29. Ishihara M., Keller P.E., Rossetti Y., Prinz W. Horizontal spatial representations of time: Evidence for the STEARC effect. Cortex 2008, 44:454-461.
30. Kemler-Nelson D.G. The nature and occurrence of holistic processing. Object perception: Structure and process 1989, 357-386. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. B. Shepp, S. Ballesteros (Eds.).
31. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Metaphors we live by 1980, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
32. Leon M.I., Shadlen M.N. Representation of time by neurons in the posterior parietal cortex of the macaque. Neuron 2003, 38:317-327.
33. Loetscher T., Schwarz U., Schubiger M., Brugger P. Head turns bias the brain's internal random generator. Current Biology 2008, 18:R60-R62.
34. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. Spatial attention and the mental number line: Evidence for characteristic biases and compression. Neuropsychologia 2007, 45:1400-1407.
35. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. Bisecting the mental number line in near and far space. Brain and Cognition 2010, 72:362-367.
36. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. Multiple spatial representations of number: Evidence for co-existing compressive and linear scales. Experimental Brain Research 2009, 193:151-156.
37. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. General magnitude representation in human infants. Psychological Science 2010, 21:873-881.
38. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. Origins and development of generalized magnitude representation. Space, time and number in the brain: Searching for the foundations of mathematical thought 2011, 225-244. Elsevier, London. S. Dehaene, E.M. Brannon (Eds.).
39. Maquet P., Lejeune H., Pouthas V., Bonnet M., Casini L., Macar F., et al. Brain activation induced by estimation of duration: A PET study. NeuroImage 1996, 3:119-126.
40. Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C.J. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2002, 6:255-260.
41. Meck W.H., Church R.M. A mode control model of counting and timing processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1983, 9:320-334.
42. Monsell S. Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:134-140.
43. Nakashima T., Goto Y., Abe T., Kaneko K., Saito T., Makinouchi A., et al. Electrophysiological evidence for sequential discrimination of positive and negative facial expressions. Clinical Neurophysiology 2008, 119:1803-1811.
44. Navon D. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology 1977, 9:353-363.
45. Nieder A. Counting on neurons: The neurobiology of numerical competence. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2005, 6:177-190.
46. Nuerk H.C., Iversen W., Willmes K. Notational modulation of the SNARC effect and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2004, 57A:835-863.
47. Oldfield R.C. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971, 9:97-113.
48. Piazza M., Pinel P., Le Bihan D., Dehaene S. A magnitude code common to numerosities and number symbols in human intraparietal cortex. Neuron 2007, 53:293-305.
49. Pinel P., Piazza M., Le Bihan D., Dehaene S. Distributed and overlapping cerebral representations of number, size, and luminance during comparative judgments. Neuron 2004, 41:1-20.
50. Proctor R.W., Cho Y.S. Polarity correspondence. A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks. Psychological Bulletin 2006, 132:416-442.
51. Root J.C., Wong P.S., Kinsbourne M. Left hemisphere specialization for response to positive emotional expressions: A divided output methodology. Emotion 2006, 6:473-483.
52. Salillas E., El Yagoubi R., Semenza C. Sensory and cognitive processes of shifts of spatial attention induced by numbers: An ERP study. Cortex 2008, 44:406-413.
53. Sereno M.I., Pitzalis S., Martinez A. Mapping of contralateral space in retinotopic coordinates by a parietal cortical area in humans. Science 2001, 294:1350-1354.
54. Smith L.B. A model of perceptual classification in children and adults. Psychological Review 1989, 96:125-144.
55. Smith L.B., Heise D. Perceptual similarity and conceptual structure. Percepts, concepts, and categories: The representation and processing of information 1992, 233-272. Elsevier, New York. B. Burns (Ed.).
56. Snyder J.J., Chatterjee A. Spatial-temporal anisometries following right parietal damage. Neuropsychologia 2004, 42:1703-1708.
57. Stevens S.S. On the psychophysical law. Psychological Review 1957, 64:153-181.
58. Stevens S.S. Psychophysics: Introduction to its perceptual, neural, and social prospects 1975, Wiley, New York.
59. Taylor M.J., Edmonds G.E., McCarthy G., Allison T. Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children. NeuroReport 2001, 12:1671-1676.
60. Thompson C.A., Siegler R.S. Linear numerical-magnitude representations aid children's memory for numbers. Psychological Science 2010, 21:1274-1281.
61. Tottenham N., Tanaka J.W., Leon A.C., McCarry T., Nurse M., Hare T.A., et al. The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research 2009, 168:242-249.
62. Tudusciuc O., Nieder A. Neuronal population coding of continuous and discrete quantity in the primate posterior parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2007, 104:14513-14518.
63. Vallesi A., Binns M.A., Shallice T. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time. Cognition 2008, 107:501-527.
64. van Dijck J.-P., Gevers W., Fias W. Numbers are associated with different types of spatial information depending on the task. Cognition 2009, 113:248-253.
65. Vicario C.M., Pecoraro P., Turriziani P., Koch G., Caltagirone C., Oliveri M. Relativistic compression and expansion of experiential time in the left and right space. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e1716.
66. Walsh V. A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7:483-488.
67. Wencil E.B., Radoeva P., Chatterjee A. Size isn't all that matters: Noticing differences in size and temporal order. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 2010, 4:1-10.
68. Wood G., Willmes K., Nuerk H.-C., Fischer M.H. On the cognitive link between space and number: A meta-analysis of the SNARC effect. Psychology Science 2008, 50:489-525.
69. Zorzi M., Priftis K., Umiltà C. Brain damage: Neglect disrupts the mental number line. Nature 2002, 417:138-139.