Action compatibility effects are hedonically marked and have incidental consequences on affective judgment

Emotion

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1202-1205

  Brouillet, Thibaut ^a,b   Ferrier, Laurent P ^a   Grosselin, Anne ^a,c   Brouillet, Denis ^a  

^a University of Montpellier   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF SAINT ETIENNE   (France)

Author keywords

Action compatibility; Affective judgment; Embodimen; Emotion

Indexed keywords

ACTION COMPATIBILITY EFFECT; ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; EMOTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; FEMALE; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; PROPRIOCEPTION; REACTION TIME; REPETITION PRIMING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053997033     PISSN: 15283542     EISSN: 19311516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024742     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barsalou L.W. Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology 2008, 59:617-645.
2. Brouillet T., Heurley L., Martin S., Brouillet D. The embodied cognition theory and the motor component of "yes" and "no" verbal responses. Acta Psychologica 2010, 134:310-317.
3. Cannon P.R., Hayes A.E., Tipper S.P. Sensorimotor fluency influences affect: Evidence from electromyography. Cognition and Emotion 2010, 24:681-691.
4. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable manmade objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
5. Content A., Mousty P., Radeau M. Brulex, une base de données lexicales informatisée pour le français écrit et parlé. L'Année Psychologique 1990, 90:551-566.
6. Fazio R.H., Sanbonmastu D.M., Powell M.C., Kardes F.R. On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1986, 50:229-238.
7. Glenberg A.M., Kaschak M.P. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2002, 9:558-565.
8. Jeannerod M. Motor cognition: What actions tell the self 2006, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
9. Musch J., Klauer K.C. Affective priming: Findings and theories. The psychology of evaluation 2003, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ. J. Musch, K.C. Klauer (Eds.).
10. Nowak A., Vallacher R.R. Dynamical social psychology 1998, Guilford Press, New York.
11. Reber R., Schwarz N., Winkielman P. Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver's processing experience?. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2004, 8:364-382.
12. Schneider W., Eschman A., Zuccolotto A. E-Prime user's guide 2002, Psychology Software Tools, Inc, Pittsburgh.
13. Scorolli C., Borghi A.M. Sentence comprehension and action: Effector-specific modulation of the motor system. Brain Research 2007, 1130:119-124.
14. Syssau A., Font N. Evaluations des caractéristiques émotionnelles d'un corpus de 604 mots. Bulletin de Psychologie 2005, 58:361-367.
15. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
16. Unkelbach C., Fiedler K., Bayer M., Stegmüler M., Danner D. Why positive information is processed faster: The density hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2008, 95:36-49.
17. Winkielman P., Cacioppo J.T. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation leads to positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 2001, 81:989-1000.
18. Zwaan R.A. Experiential traces and mental simulations in language comprehension. Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition 2008, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England. M. de Vega, A.M. Glenberg, A.C. Grasser (Eds.).