2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models

Medical Image Analysis

Volumn 15, Issue 6, 2011, Pages 840-850

  Baka, N ^a,b   Kaptein, B L ^a   de Bruijne, M ^b,c   van Walsum, T ^b   Giphart, J E ^d   Niessen, W J ^b,e   Lelieveldt, B P F ^a,e  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^d STEADMAN PHILIPPON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

3D 2D non rigid registration; Biplane fluoroscopy; Edge selection; PDM; SSM

Indexed keywords

3-D SHAPE; ACQUISITION COSTS; BIPLANE FLUOROSCOPY; BONE MOTION; BONE SURFACE; CANNY EDGES; CT SEGMENTATION; D-SHAPE; DISTAL FEMURS; DISTANCE-BASED; EDGE SELECTION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; GROUND TRUTH; IMAGE EDGE; IN-VIVO; MODELING AND SIMULATION; NON-RIGID; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PATIENT SPECIFIC; POSE ESTIMATION; RADIATION DOSE; RIGID REGISTRATION; ROOT MEAN SQUARED; SHAPE ESTIMATION; SHAPE RECONSTRUCTION; SSM; STATISTICAL SHAPE MODEL; SUBMILLIMETERS; SURGERY PLANNING; USER INTERACTION; X-RAY IMAGE; XRAY IMAGING;

BONE; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; ESTIMATION; FLUORESCENT SCREENS; MEDICAL APPLICATIONS; MEDICAL IMAGING; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS; TIME AND MOTION STUDY; TIME SERIES; X RAY ANALYSIS; X RAY APPARATUS; X RAYS;

THREE DIMENSIONAL;

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IN VIVO STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; FEMUR; FLUVOXAMINE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, STATISTICAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 80053994032     PISSN: 13618415     EISSN: 13618423     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2011.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Benameur S., Mignotte M., Parent S., Labelle H., Skalli W., Guise J.D. 3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2003, 27:321-337.
2. Cootes T.F., Cooper D.H., Taylor C.J., Graham J. Trainable method of parametric shape description. Image Vision Comput. 1992, 10:289-294.
3. Dennis, D.A., Mahfouz, M.R., Komistek, R.D., Hoff, W., 2005. In vivo determination of normal and anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee kinematics. Journal of Biomechanics 38, 241-253. Knee Mechanics: An Update of Theoretical and Experimental Analyses.
4. Dworzak, J., Lamecker, H., von Berg, J., Klinder, T., Lorenz, C., Kainmüller, D., Seim, H., Hege, H.C., Zachow, S., 2010. 3D reconstruction of the human rib cage from 2D projection images using a statistical shape model. In: International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.
5. Feldmar, J., Ayache, N., Betting, F., 1995. 3D-2D projective registration of free-form curves and surfaces. In: ICCV, pp. 549-556.
6. Ferrarini L., Olofsen H., Palm W., van Buchem M., Reiber J., Admiraal-Behloul F. Games: growing and adaptive meshes for fully automatic shape modeling and analysis. Medical Image Analysis 2007, 11:302-314.
7. Fleute M., Lavallée S. Nonrigid 3-D/2-D registration of images using statistical models. MICCAI '99: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 1999, 138-147. Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
8. Harrysson, O.L., Hosni, Y.A., Nayfeh, J.F., 2007. Custom-designed orthopedic implants evaluated using finite element analysis of patient-specific computed tomography data: femoral-component case study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 8:91.
9. Hart R., vb P., Filan P. Intraoperative navigation in hip surface arthroplasty: a radiographic comparative analysis study. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 2008, 128:429-434.
10. Hurvitz A., Joskowicz L. Registration of a ct-like atlas to fluoroscopic X-ray images using intensity correspondences. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS) 2008, 3:493-504.
11. Iwashita, Y., Kurazume, R., Hasegawa, T., Hara, K., 2005. Fast alignment of 3D geometrical models and 2D color images using 2D distance maps. In: 3DIM'05: Fifth International Conference on 3-D Digital Imaging and Modeling, pp. 164-171.
12. Jain A.K., Zhong Y., Lakshmanan S. Object matching using deformable templates. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 1996, 18:267-278.
13. Kaptein B., Valstar E., Stoel B., Rozing P., Reiber J. A new model-based rsa method validated using cad models and models from reversed engineering. Journal of Biomechanics 2003, 36:873-882.
14. van de Kraats E., Penney G., Tomazevic D., van Walsum T., Niessen W. Standardized Evaluation Methodology for 2D-3D registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2005, 24:1177-1190.
15. Krekel, P.R., Botha, C.P., Valstar, E.R., de Bruin, P.W., Rozing, P.M., Post, F.H., 2006. Interactive simulation and comparative visualisation of the bone-determined range of motion of the human shoulder. In: SimVis, pp. 275-288.
16. Kurazume R., Nakamura K., Okada T., Sato Y., Sugano N., Koyama T., Iwashita Y., Hasegawa T. 3D reconstruction of a femoral shape using a parametric model and two 2D fluoroscopic images. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 2009, 113:202-211.
17. Lamecker H., Wenckebach T.H., Hege H.C. Atlas-based 3D-shape reconstruction from X-ray images. ICPR '06: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition 2006, 371-374. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA.
18. Laporte S., Skalli W., de Guise J.A., Lavaste F., Mitton D. A biplanar reconstruction method based on 2D and 3D contours: Application to the distal femur. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 2003, 6:1-6.
19. Lavallée S., Szeliski R., Brunie L. Matching 3-D smooth surfaces with their 2-D projections using 3-D distance maps. Selected Papers from the Workshop on Geometric Reasoning for Perception and Action 1993, 217-238. Springer-Verlag, London, UK.
20. Markelj, P., Tomaževič, D., Likar, B., Pernuš, F., 2010. A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions. Medical Image Analysis.
21. Mazzoli A., Germani M., Raffaeli R. Direct fabrication through electron beam melting technology of custom cranial implants designed in a phantom-based haptic environment. Materials & Design 2009, 30:3186-3192.
22. Siston R.A., Giori N.J., Goodman S.B., Delp S.L. Surgical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a perspective. Journal of Biomechanics 2007, 40:728-735.
23. Tang T., Ellis R. 2D/3D deformable registration using a hybrid atlas. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention 2005, 8:223-230.
24. Torry, M.R., Shelburne, K.B., Peterson, D.S., Giphart, J.E., Krong, J.P., Myers, C., Steadman, J.R., Woo, S.L.Y., 2010. Knee kinematic profiles during drop landings: A biplane fluoroscopy study. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise.
25. Valstar E., Gill R., Ryd L., FLivik G., Börlin N., Kärrholm J. Guidelines for standardization of radiostereometry (rsa) of implants. Acta Orthopaedica 2005, 76(4):563-572.
26. Yao J., Taylor R. Assessing accuracy factors in deformable 2D/3D medical image registration using a statistical pelvis model. ICCV '03: Proceedings of the Ninth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision 2003, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, p. 1329.
27. Zheng G., Gollmer S., Schumann S., Dong X., Feilkas T., Ballester M.A.G. A 2D/3D correspondence building method for reconstruction of a patient-specific 3D bone surface model using point distribution models and calibrated X-ray images. Medical Image Analysis 2008, 13(6):883-899.
28. Zheng G., Schumann S. 3D reconstruction of a patient-specific surface model of the proximal femur from calibrated X-ray radiographs: A validation study. Medical Physics 2009, 36:1155-1166.