Registration of a CT-like atlas to fluoroscopic X-ray images using intensity correspondences

International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery

Volumn 3, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 493-504

  Hurvitz, Aviv ^a   Joskowicz, Leo ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

2D 3 Dregistration; Deformable registration; Shape modeling

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; ATLAS; BONE REMODELING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FEMUR; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REGISTRATION; SIMULATION; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 57149088619     PISSN: 18616410     EISSN: 18616429     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-008-0264-z     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Maintz J, Viergever M (1998) A survey of medical image registration. Med Image Anal 2(1): 1-37
2. Joskowicz L, Knaan D, Livyatan H, Yaniv Z, Khoury A, Mosheiff R, Liebergall M (2003) Anatomical image-based rigid registration between fluoroscopic X-ray and CT: Methods comparison and experimental results. In: CARS, pp 419-425
3. Bansal R, Staib L, Chen Z, Rangarajan A, Knisely J, Nath R, Duncan J (2003) Entropy-based dual-portal-to-3-DCT registration incorporating pixel correlation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 22: 29-49
4. Sarrut D, Clippe S (2001) Geometrical transformation approximation for 2D/3D intensity-based registration of portal images and CT scan. In: MICCAI, pp 532-540
5. Bifulco P, Cesarelli M, Allen R, Sansone M, Bracale M (2001) Automatic recognition of vertebral landmarks in fluoroscopic sequences for analysis of intervertebral kinematics. Med Biol Eng Comput 39(1): 65-75
6. Benameur S, Mignotte M, Parent S, Labelle H, Skalli W, Guise JD (2003) 3D/2D registration and segmentation of scoliotic vertebrae using statistical models. Comput Med Imag Graph 27(5): 321-337
7. McLaughlin RA, Hipwell J, Hawkes DJ, Noble J, Byrne JV, Cox T (2002) A comparison of 2D-3D intensity-based registration and feature-based registration for neurointerventions. In: MICCAI, vol 2489/2002. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 517-524
8. Tang TSY, Ellis RE (2005) 2D/3D deformable registration using a hybrid atlas. In: MICCAI (2), pp 223-230
9. Lamecker H, Wenckebach T, Hege HC (2006) Atlas-based 3D-shape reconstruction from X-ray images. Int Conf Pattern Recog (ICPR') 2006(1): 371-374
10. Benameur S, Mignotte M, Labelle H, Guise JD (2005) A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52(12): 2041-2057
11. Yao J, Taylor R (2003) Assessing accuracy factors in deformable 2D/3D medical image registration using a statistical pelvis model. In: Proc IEEE int conf comput vis (ICCV'03). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, p 1329
12. Chintalapani G, Ellingsen LM, Sadowsky O, Prince JL, Taylor RH (2007) Statistical atlases of bone anatomy: Construction, iterative improvement and validation. In: MICCAI (1), pp 499-506
13. Fleute M, Lavallée S (1999) Nonrigid 3D/2D registration of images using statistical models. In: MICCAI, pp 138-147
14. Zheng G, Dong X, Ballester MAé G (2007) Unsupervised reconstruction of a patient-specific surface model of a proximal femur from calibrated fluoroscopic images. In: MICCAI (1), pp 834-841
15. Cootes TF, Edwards GJ, Taylor CJ (2003) Active appearance models. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(6): 681-685
16. Matthews I, Baker S (2004) Active appearance models revisited. Int J Comput Vis (IJCV) 60(2): 135-164
17. Ibanez L, Schroeder W, Ng L, Cates J (2005) The ITK software guide, 2nd edn. Kitware, Inc. ISBN 1-930934-15-7. http://www.itk.org/ ItkSoftwareGuide.pdf
18. Klein S, Staring M (2007) Elastix. Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht. http://www.isi.uu.nl/Elastix/
19. Rueckert D, Frangi AF, Schnabel JA (2001) Automatic construction of 3D statistical deformation models using non-rigid registration. In: MICCAI, London, UK. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 77-84
20. Si H (2006) TetGen: A quality tetrahedral mesh generator and three-dimensional delaunay triangulator. Weierstrass Institute for Applied Analysis and Stochastics, Berlin. http://tetgen.berlios.de/
21. Livyatan H, Yaniv Z, Joskowicz L (2002) Robust automatic C-arm calibration for fluoroscopic-based navigation: A practical approach. In: MICCAI, vol II, pp 60-68
22. Lemieux L, Jagoe R, Fish DR et al (1994) A patient-to-computed-tomography image registration method based on digitally reconstructed radiographs. Med Phys 21(11): 1749-1760
23. Penney G, Batchelor P, Hill D, Hawkes D, Weese J (2001) Validation of a two-to three-dimensional registration algorithm for aligning preoperative CT images and intraoperative fluoroscopy images. Med Phys 28(6): 1024-1032
24. Staring M, Klein S, Pluim J (2007) A rigidity penalty term for nonrigid registration. Med Phys 34(11): 4098-4108
25. Lewis RM, Torczon V (1999) Pattern search algorithms for bound constrained minimization. SIAM J Opt 9(4): 1082-1099
26. Marmitt G, Slusallek P (2006) Fast ray traversal of tetrahedral and hexahedral meshes for direct volume rendering. In: Ertl T, Joy KJ, Santos B (eds) Proc Eurographics/IEEE-VGTC Symp Visualization (EuroVIS'06), Lisbon, Portugal
27. Aspert N, Santa-Cruz D, Ebrahimi T (2002) Mesh: Measuring errors between surfaces using the hausdorff distance. In: Proc IEEE int conf on multimedia and expo (ICME), vol I, pp 705-708. http://mesh.epfl.ch
28. Livyatan H, Yaniv Z, Joskowicz L (2003) Gradient-based 2D/3D rigid registration of fluoroscopic X-ray to CT. IEEE Trans Med Imag 22(11): 1395-1406
29. Fleute M, Lavallée S, Desbat L (2002) Integrated approach for matching statistical shape models with intra-operative 2D and 3D data. In: MICCAI (2), pp 364-372