Current status of hybrid coronary revascularization

Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy

Volumn 9, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1331-1337

  Jaik, Nikhil P ^a   Umakanthan, Ramanan ^a   Leacche, Marzia ^a   Solenkova, Natalia ^a   Balaguer, Jorge M ^a   Hoff, Steven J ^a   Ball, Stephen K ^a   Zhao, David X ^a   Byrne, John G ^a  

^a VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting surgery; Coronary artery disease; Hybrid coronary revascularization; Hybrid operating rooms; Percutaneous coronary intervention

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; CLOPIDOGREL; TICLOPIDINE;

ANTICOAGULANT THERAPY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; HYBRID CORONARY REVASCULARIZATION; INTERVENTION STUDY; LOADING DRUG DOSE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; STENT THROMBOSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT CONTRAINDICATION; TREATMENT INDICATION;

ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON, CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; HUMANS; PLATELET AGGREGATION INHIBITORS;

EID: 80053981776     PISSN: 14779072     EISSN: 17448344     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1586/erc.11.124     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI) Investigators. Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty in patients with multivessel disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 335, 217-225 (1996).
2. Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 961-972 (2009).
3. BARI Investigators. The final 10-year follow-up results from the BARI randomized trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 49, 1600-1606 (2007).
4. Alexander JH, Hafley G, Harrington RA et al. Efficacy and safety of edifoligide, an E2F transcription factor decoy, for prevention of vein graft failure following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: PREVENT IV: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294, 2446-2454 (2005). (Pubitemid 41627922)
5. Puskas JD, Williams WH, Mahoney EM et al. Off-pump vs conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: early and 1-year graft patency, cost, and quality-of-life outcomes: a randomized trial. JAMA 291, 1841-1849 (2004). (Pubitemid 38509496)
6. Balacumaraswami L, Taggart DP. Intraoperative imaging techniques to assess coronary artery bypass graft patency. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 83, 2251-2257 (2007). (Pubitemid 46782628)
7. Grube E, Silber S, Hauptmann KE et al. TAXUS I: six-and twelve-month results from a randomized, double-blind trial on a slow-release paclitaxel-eluting stent for de novo coronary lesions. Circulation 107, 38-42 (2003). (Pubitemid 36070930)
8. Lloyd CT, Calafiore AM, Wilde P et al. Integrated left anterior small thoracotomy and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 68, 908-912 (1999). (Pubitemid 29526859)
9. Isomura T, Suma H, Horii T et al. Minimally invasive coronary artery revascularization: off-pump bypass grafting and the hybrid procedure. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 70, 2017-2022 (2000). (Pubitemid 32015301)
10. De Canniere D, Jansens JL, Goldschmidt- Clermont P et al. Combination of minimally invasive coronary bypass and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in the treatment of doublevessel coronary disease: Two-year follow-up of a new hybrid procedure compared with 'on-pump' double bypass grafting. Am. Heart J. 142, 563-570 (2001). (Pubitemid 32900480)
11. Presbitero P, Nicolini F, Maiello L et al. 'Hybrid' percutaneous and surgical coronary revascularization: selection criteria from a single-center experience. Ital. Heart J. 2, 363-368 (2001). (Pubitemid 32536887)
12. Cisowski M, Morawski W, Drzewiecki J et al. Integrated minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting and angioplasty for coronary artery revascularization. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 22, 261-265 (2002). (Pubitemid 34831867)
13. Stahl KD, Boyd WD, Vassiliades TA et al. Hybrid robotic coronary artery surgery and angioplasty in multivessel coronary artery disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 74, S1358-S1362 (2002). (Pubitemid 35176795)
14. Angelini GD, Taylor FC, Reeves BC et al. Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2), a pooled analysis of two randomized controlled trials. Lancet 359, 1194-1199 (2002). (Pubitemid 34304259)
15. Lewis BS, Porat E, Halon DA et al. Same-day combined coronary angioplasty and minimally invasive coronary surgery. Am. J. Cardiol. 84, 1246-1247, A8 (1999).
16. Wittwer T, Cremer J, Klima U et al. Myocardial 'hybrid' revascularization: intermediate results of an alternative approach to multivessel coronary artery disease. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 118, 766-767 (1999). (Pubitemid 29474813)
17. Riess FC, Bader R, Kremer P et al. Coronary hybrid revascularization from January 1997 to January 2001, a clinical follow-up. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 73, 1849-1855 (2002). (Pubitemid 34596729)
18. Zenati M, Cohen HA, Griffith BP. Alternative approach to multivessel coronary disease with integrated coronary revascularization. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 117, 439-446 (1999). (Pubitemid 29117522)
19. Us MH, Basaran M, Yilmaz M et al. Hybrid coronary revascularization in high-risk patients. Tex. Heart Inst. J. 33, 458-462 (2006). (Pubitemid 46103517)
20. Gilard M, Bezon E, Cornily JC et al. Sameday combined percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery surgery. Cardiology 108, 363-367 (2007). (Pubitemid 350126485)
21. Kon ZN, Brown EN, Tran R et al. Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization reduces postoperative morbidity compared with results from conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 135, 367-375 (2008).
22. Reicher B, Poston RS, Mehra MR et al. Simultaneous 'hybrid' percutaneous coronary intervention and minimally invasive surgical bypass grafting: feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes. Am. Heart J. 155, 661-667 (2008).
23. Lee MS, Wilentz JR, Makkar RR et al. Hybrid revascularization using percutaneous coronary intervention and robotically assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery. J. Invasive Cardiol. 16, 419-425 (2004). (Pubitemid 39095299)
24. Davidavicius G, Van Praet F, Mansour S et al. Hybrid revascularization strategy: a pilot study on the association of robotically enhanced minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery and fractional-flowreserve- guided percutaneous coronary intervention. Circulation 112, I317-I322 (2005). (Pubitemid 41266693)
25. Kiaii B, McClure RS, Kostuk WJ et al. Concurrent robotic hybrid revascularization using an enhanced operative suite. Chest 128, 4046-4048 (2005). (Pubitemid 43062671)
26. Katz MR, Van Praet F, de Canniere D et al. Integrated coronary revascularization: percutaneous coronary intervention plus robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass. Circulation 114, I473-I476 (2006). (Pubitemid 44297194)
27. Vassiliades TA Jr, Douglas JS, Morris DC et al. Integrated coronary revascularization with drug-eluting stents: immediate and seven-month outcome. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 131, 956-962 (2006).
28. Bonatti J, Schachner T, Bonaros N et al. Simultaneous hybrid coronary revascularization using totally endoscopic left internal mammary artery bypass grafting and placement of rapamycin eluting stents in the same interventional session. The COMBINATION Pilot Study. Cardiology 110, 92-95 (2007). (Pubitemid 351630033)
29. Holzhey DM, Jacobs S, Mochalski M, Merk D et al. Minimally invasive hybrid coronary artery revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 86, 1856-1860 (2008).
30. Zhao DX, Leacche M, Balaguer JM et al. Routine intraoperative completion angiography after coronary artery bypass grafting and 1-stop hybrid revascularization results from a fully integrated hybrid catheterization laboratory/operating room. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 53, 232-241 (2009).
31. Byrne JG, Leacche M, Vaughan DE et al. Hybrid cardiovascular procedures. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 1, 459-468 (2008).
32. Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N. Engl. J. Med. 349, 1315-1323 (2003). (Pubitemid 37186209)