Research practices and scholarly communication in the digital environment

Learned Publishing

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 231-249

  Houghton, John W ^a   Steele, Colin ^b   Henty, Margaret ^b  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242766063     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/095315104323159667     Document Type: Review

References (57)

1. OECD. National Innovation Systems. Paris: OECD, 1997, p. 43.
2. Houghton, J.W., Steele, C. and Henry, M. Changing Research Practices in the Digital Information and Communication Environment. Canberra: DEST, 2003. The project was supported by funding from the Department of Education, Science and Training (see http://www.dest.gov.au/highered/respubs/changing_res_prac/ exec_summary.htm).
3. Atkins, D.E. et al. Revolutionizing Science and Engineering Through Cyberinfrastructure, Arlington: National Science Foundation, 2003, p. 4.
4. OECD. The Global Research Village: How Information and Communication Technologies Affect the Science System. Paris: OECD, 1998.
5. National Research Council. Issues for Science and Engineering Researchers in the Digital Age. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2001.
6. National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2002. Arlington: National Science Foundation, 2002 (NSB-02-1).
7. Cohen, J. Computer mediated communication and publication productivity among faculty. Internet Research 1996:6, 41-63.
8. Katz, J.S. and Martin, B.R. What is research collaboration? Research Policy 1997:26, 1-18.
9. Walsh, J.P. and Maloney, N.G. Computer network use, collaboration structures and productivity. In P. Hinds and S. Kiesler (eds), Distributed Work. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
10. Katz, J.S. and Hicks, D. How Much is Collaboration Worth? A Calibrated Bibliometric Model Brighton: University of Sussex (SPRU), 1997.
11. Walsh J.P. and Bayma, T. The virtual college: computer mediated communication and scientific work. The Information Society 1996:12, 343-63; and OECD. The Global Research Village: How Information and Communication Technologies Affect the Science System. Paris: OECD, 1998.
12. Walsh J.P. and Bayma, T. The virtual college: computer mediated communication and scientific work. The Information Society 1996:12, 343-63; and OECD. The Global Research Village: How Information and Communication Technologies Affect the Science System. Paris: OECD, 1998.
13. OECD. University Research in Transition, Paris: OECD, 1999.
14. Walsh, J.P., Kucker, S., Maloney, N.G. and Gabbay, S. Connecting minds: computer-mediated communication and scientific work. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 2000:51, 1295-1305.
15. Gibbons, M., Nowotny, H., Limoges, C., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P. and Trow, M. The New Production of Knowkdge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage, 1994.
16. Education for Change. Researchers' Use of Libraries and other Information Sources: Current Patterns and Future Trends. London: Research Support Libraries Group, 2002, p. 16.
17. Brockman, W.S., Neumann, L., Palmer, C.L. and Tidline, T.J. Scholarly Work in the Humanities and the Evolving Information Environment. Washington: CLIR, 2001.
18. Tenopir, C., Hitchcock, C. and Pillow, A. Use and Users of Electronic Library Resources: An Overview and Analysis of Recent Research Studies. Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources, 2003.
19. Heterick, B. Faculty attitudes toward electronic resources. EDUCAUSE Review, 2002, 10-11.
20. Guthrie, K. What Do Faculty Think of Electronic Resources? CNI Project Briefing JSTOR, 2001.
21. Healy, L.W. The voice of the user: where students and faculty go for information. Paper presented at Educause 2000, Atlanta.
22. Friedlander, A. Dimensions and Use of the Scholarly Information Environment. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources, 2002.
23. Key Perspectives. Authors and Electronic Publishing. Worthing: ALPSP, 2002, p. 39.
24. Tenopir, C., Grayson, M., Zhang, Y., Ebuen, M., King, D.W., Boyce, P. and Mitchell, M. Patterns of journal use by scientists through three evolutionary phases. D-lib Magazine 2003:9(5), May 2003.
25. Worlock, K. Electronic journals: user realities - the truth about content usage among the STM community. Learned Publishing, 2002:15, 223-6.
26. Institute for the Future. E-Journal Usage and Scholarly Practice: An Ethnographic Perspective on the Role and Impact of E-Journal Usage Among Users of Biomedical Literature, Palo Alto: Stanford University Libraries and Highwire Press, 2001
27. Institute for the Future. Core Scholarly Information Tasks and E-Joumal Features: Expanded Discussion. Palo Alto: Stanford University Libraries and Highwire Press, 2002.
28. E-Just. E-Journal User Study Report of the Second Survey: The Feature User Survey. Palo Alto: Stanford University Libraries and Highwire Press, 2002; and E-Just. Research Findings. Palo Alto: Stanford University Libraries and Highwire Press, 2002.
29. E-Just. E-Journal User Study Report of the Second Survey: The Feature User Survey. Palo Alto: Stanford University Libraries and Highwire Press, 2002; and E-Just. Research Findings. Palo Alto: Stanford University Libraries and Highwire Press, 2002.
30. Massey-Burzio, V. The rush to technology: a view from the humanists. Library Trends 1999:47(4), 620-39.
31. Palmer, J.P. and Sandler, M. What do faculty want? Library Journal 2003 (Jan): 15.
32. Palmer, C.L. and Neumann, L.J. The information work of interdisciplinary humanities scholars: explor- ation and translation. Library Quarterly 2002:72, 85-117.
33. Wulf, W. Outline. Computer Science and the Humanities, 2002 Conference. National Initiative for a Networked Cultural Heritage, Washington, DC.
34. Greenstein D. Information technology and humanities scholarship. Educause Quarterly 2003:1, 60-1.
35. Henry, C. Transcending the material: the library of the 21st century. Turnbull Founder Lecture, National Library of New Zealand, 20 June 2003, Wellington.
36. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Watkins, A. Digital journals, big deals, and online searching behaviour: a pilot study. Aslib Proceedings 2003:55(1/2), 84-109.
37. Lyman, P. and Varian, H.R. How Much Information? 2003. Berkeley: University of California, 2003.
38. Hey, T. and Trefethen, A. The data deluge: an e-science perspective. UK e-Science Core Programme, 2002 (http://aspen.ucs.indiana.edu/CCPEwebresource/ c613gridheytrefethen/DataDeluge(final).pdf).
39. King, D.W. and Tenopir, C. Scholarly journal and digital database pricing: threat or opportunity?' PEAK 2000 (www.si.umich.edu/PEAK-2000/king.pdf) .
40. Odlyzko, A. The rapid evolution of scholarly publishing. Learned Publishing 2002(1):15, 7-19.
41. JISC Scholarly Communications Group. Final report from the JISC Scholarly Communications Group (SCG) to the Research Support Libraries Group (RSLG), London: Joint Information Services Committee, 2002.
42. Willinsky, J. and Wolfson, L. A tipping point for publishing reform. Journal of Electronic Publishing 2001:7(2).
43. Harnad, S. Minotaur: six proposals for freeing the refereed literature online: a comparison. Ariadne 2001:28.
44. Parks, R.P. The Faustian Grip of Academie Publishing. St Louis: Washington University, 2001.
45. Houghton, J.W. Crisis and transition: the economics of scholarly communication. Learned Publishing 2001:14(3), Jul 2001, 167-76.
46. Poynder, R.A. True market failure. Information Today 2002:19(11).
47. Frankel, M.S. Seizing the moment: scientists authorship rights in the digital age. Learned Publishing 2003:16(2), 123-8.
48. Crow, R. The Case for Institutional Repositories: A SPARC Position Paper. Washington, DC: Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition (SPARC), 2002.
49. Lynch, C.A. Institutional repositories: essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL 2003:226, 1-7.
50. Needleman, M. The Open Archives Initiative. Serials Review 2002:28(2), 156-8.
51. The Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities, Oct 2003. See http://www.zim.mpg.de/openaccess-berlin/ berlindeclaration.html.
52. Wittenberg, K. Scholarly editing in the digital age. Chronicle of Higher Education 2003:49(41), 20 Jun.
53. Esposito, J.J. The processed book. FirstMonday 2003:8(3).
54. Cope, B. and Kalantzis, M. Text - made text. Melbourne: Common Ground 2003:1.
55. Lynch, C. The battle to define the future of the book in the digital world. FirstMonday 2001:6(6).
56. Swan, A. and Brown, S. What Authors Want: The ALPSP Research Study on the Motivations and Concerns of Contributors to Learned Journals. Worthing: ALPSP, 1999.
57. Drucker, P. Post-capitalist Society. New York: Harper Collins, 1993.